Cited by 98Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPregnancy and Medication Impact

Intermittent Treatment for the Prevention of Malaria during Pregnancy in Benin: A Randomized, Open‐Label Equivalence Trial Comparing Sulfadoxine‐Pyrimethamine with Mefloquine

Briand, Valérie, Bottero, Julie, Noël, Harold, Masse, Virginie, Cordel, Hugues, Guerra, José, Kossou, Hortense, Fayomi, Benjamin +4 more·2009·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the context of the increasing resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), we evaluated the efficacy of mefloquine (MQ) for intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp). METHODS: A multicenter, open-label equivalence trial was conducted in Benin from July 2005 through April 2008. Women of all gravidities were randomized to receive SP (1500 mg of sulfadoxine and 75 mg of pyrimethamine) or 15 mg/kg MQ in a single intake twice during pregnancy. The primary end point was the proportion of low-birth-weight (LBW) infants (body weight, <2500 g; equivalence margin, 5%). RESULTS: A total of 1601 women were randomized to receive MQ (n=802)or SP (n=799).In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, which assessed only live singleton births, 59 (8%) of 735 women who were given MQ and 72 (9.8%) of 730 women who were given SP gave birth to LBW infants (difference between low birth weights in treatment groups, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.8% to 1.1%]), establishing equivalence between the drugs. The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. MQ was more efficacious than SP in preventing placental malaria (prevalence, 1.7% vs 4.4% of women; P = .005),clinical malaria (incidence rate, 26 cases/10,000 person-months vs. 68 cases/10,000 person-months; P = .007) and maternal anemia at delivery (as defined by a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL) (prevalence, 16% vs 20%; marginally significant at P = .09). Adverse events (mainly vomiting, dizziness, tiredness, and nausea) were more commonly associated with the use of MQ (prevalence, 78% vs 32%; P < 10(-3)) One woman in the MQ group had severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MQ proved to be highly efficacious--both clinically and parasitologically--for use as IPTp. However, its low tolerability might impair its effectiveness and requires further investigations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/605474

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MQ was more efficacious than SP in preventing placental malaria, clinical malaria and maternal anaemia at delivery.

    “MQ was more efficacious than SP in preventing placental malaria, clinical malaria and maternal anaemia at delivery.”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [109]

  • MQ was less well tolerated than SP, potentially compromising its large scale use as IPTp.

    “However, MQ was less well tolerated than SP, potentially compromising its large scale use as IPTp.108–109”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [109]

  • One study reported minor side effects with MQ.

    “One study reported minor side effects.109”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [109]

  • A trial in Benin showed that for IPTp MQ was as good as SP in preventing LBW.

    “Indeed, a trial in Benin showed that for IPTp MQ was as good as SP in preventing LBW.”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [109]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briand, V., Bottero, J., Noël, H., Masse, V., Cordel, H., Guerra, J., Kossou, H., Fayomi, B., Ayemonna, P., Fievet, N., Massougbodji, A., & Cot, M.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (BJ)
  • Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme Togo (TG)
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
200
Issue
6
Pages
991-1001
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2152609980
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, mefloquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, low birth weight, placental malaria, anemia in pregnancy, drug resistance, adverse drug reactions, antimalarial drug efficacy, Benin, malaria prevention in pregnancy, neuropsychiatric adverse effects
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Antimalarials, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Malaria, Pregnancy, Pyrimethamine, Sulfadoxine, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Mefloquine, Single-Blind Method, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review