Cited by 203Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceFire effects on ecosystemsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Vegetation, Fire, and Feedbacks: A Disturbance‐Mediated Model of Savannas

Beckage, Brian, Platt, William J., Gross, Louis J.·2009·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Savanna models that are based on recurrent disturbances such as fire result in nonequilibrium savannas, but these models rarely incorporate vegetation feedbacks on fire frequency or include more than two states (grasses and trees). We develop a disturbance model that includes vegetation-fire feedbacks, using a system of differential equations to represent three main components of savannas: grasses, fire-tolerant savanna trees, and fire-intolerant forest trees. We investigate the stability of savannas in the presence of positive feedbacks of fire frequency with (1) grasses, (2) savanna trees, and (3) grasses and savanna trees together while also allowing for negative feedbacks of forest trees on fire frequency. We find that positive feedbacks between fire frequency and savanna trees, alone or together with grasses, can stabilize savannas, blocking the conversion of savannas to forests. Negative feedbacks of forest trees on fire frequency shift the range of parameter space that supports savannas, but they do not generally alter our results. We propose that pyrogenic trees that modify characteristics of fire regimes are ecosystem engineers that facilitate the persistence of savannas, generating both threshold fire frequencies with rapid changes in community composition when these thresholds are crossed and hystereses with bistable community states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/648458

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong feedbacks between plants and fire mean that plants directly influence fire regimes.

    “However, strong feedbacks between plants and fire also mean that plants directly influence fire regimes (Beckage, Platt, & Gross, 2009;Nowacki & Abrams, 2008;Platt, Ellair, Huffman, Potts, & Beckage, 2016).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Beckage, Platt, & Gross, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beckage, B., Platt, W. J., & Gross, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2009-12
Volume
174
Issue
6
Pages
805-818
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1966574578
Cited by
203
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
savanna dynamics, fire frequency, ecosystem engineers, bistability, hysteresis, differential equation model, Poaceae, savanna trees, forest trees
MeSH terms
Fires, Poaceae, Models, Theoretical, Population Dynamics, Time Factors, Trees, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review