Trouble in Store: Probes, Protests, and Store Openings by Wal‐Mart, 1998–2007
Open accessAbstract
The authors consider how uncertainty over protest occurrence shapes the strategic interaction between companies and activists. Analyzing Wal‐Mart, the authors find support for their theory that companies respond to this uncertainty through a “test for protest” approach. In Wal‐Mart’s case, this consists of low‐cost probes in the form of new store proposals. They then withdraw if they face protests, especially when those protests signal future problems. Wal‐Mart is more likely to open stores that are particularly profitable, even if they are protested. This uncertainty‐based account stands in sharp contrast to full‐information models that characterize protests as rare miscalculations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive organizational claims may be effectively used to deflect criticism or direct attention away from a reputational threat.
“Recent work has argued that positive organizational claims may be effectively used to deflect criticism or to direct attention away from a reputational threat”
From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Ingram, Yue, and Rao, 2010
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779 · see citing works
Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency
McAdam, D. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095322 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic
Carlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839217695089 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ingram, P., Yue, L. Q., & Rao, H.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-92
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2104314089
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 31.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
- Keywords
- Walmart, protest, store opening, corporate activism, uncertainty, strategic interaction, store profitability, corporate social responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review