Cited by 268Management and Organizational StudiesPolitical Influence and Corporate StrategiesLabor Movements and Unions

Trouble in Store: Probes, Protests, and Store Openings by Wal‐Mart, 1998–2007

Open access
Ingram, Paul, Yue, Lori Qingyuan, Rao, Hayagreeva·2010·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

The authors consider how uncertainty over protest occurrence shapes the strategic interaction between companies and activists. Analyzing Wal‐Mart, the authors find support for their theory that companies respond to this uncertainty through a “test for protest” approach. In Wal‐Mart’s case, this consists of low‐cost probes in the form of new store proposals. They then withdraw if they face protests, especially when those protests signal future problems. Wal‐Mart is more likely to open stores that are particularly profitable, even if they are protested. This uncertainty‐based account stands in sharp contrast to full‐information models that characterize protests as rare miscalculations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/653596

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive organizational claims may be effectively used to deflect criticism or direct attention away from a reputational threat.

    “Recent work has argued that positive organizational claims may be effectively used to deflect criticism or to direct attention away from a reputational threat”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Ingram, Yue, and Rao, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingram, P., Yue, L. Q., & Rao, H.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2010-07
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
53-92
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2104314089
Cited by
268
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
31.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
Walmart, protest, store opening, corporate activism, uncertainty, strategic interaction, store profitability, corporate social responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review