The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement and Meaning in Biology
Abstract
Measurement--the assignment of numbers to attributes of the natural world--is central to all scientific inference. Measurement theory concerns the relationship between measurements and reality; its goal is ensuring that inferences about measurements reflect the underlying reality we intend to represent. The key principle of measurement theory is that theoretical context, the rationale for collecting measurements, is essential to defining appropriate measurements and interpreting their values. Theoretical context determines the scale type of measurements and which transformations of those measurements can be made without compromising their meaningfulness. Despite this central role, measurement theory is almost unknown in biology, and its principles are frequently violated. In this review, we present the basic ideas of measurement theory and show how it applies to theoretical as well as empirical work. We then consider examples of empirical and theoretical evolutionary studies whose meaningfulness have been compromised by violations of measurement-theoretic principles. Common errors include not paying attention to theoretical context, inappropriate transformations of data, and inadequate reporting of units, effect sizes, or estimation error. The frequency of such violations reveals the importance of raising awareness of measurement theory among biologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.
Fisher, R. A. (1919) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0080456800012163 · Cited by 4,387
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Baldwin, J. M. (1896) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/276408 · Cited by 1,781
Body mass in comparative primatology
Smith, R. J., & Jungers, W. L. (1997) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0122 · Cited by 1,307
Cope's Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Fossil Mammals
Alroy, J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.731 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.
Hemani, G., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 · Cited by 2,607
Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13434 · Cited by 1,393
“However, this comes at a cost of reduced interpretability, when the data are not on the original scale (Grilli & Rampichini, 2015; Houle et al., 2011; JacqminGadda et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHansen, T. F., & Bartoszek, K. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr122 · Cited by 200
Self-citationModel adequacy and the macroevolution of angiosperm functional traits
Pennell, M. W., FitzJohn, R. G., Cornwell, W. K., & Harmon, L. J. (2015) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/682022 · Cited by 165
Coevolutionary Constraints? The Environment Alters Tripartite Interaction Traits in a Legume
Heath, K. D., & McGhee, K. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041567 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Houle, D., Pélabon, C., Wagner, G. P., & Hansen, T. F.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-34
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2074943909
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and Meaning in Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/658408
- The paper
- Houle, D., Pélabon, C., Wagner, G. P., & Hansen, T. F. (2011). Measurement and Meaning in Biology. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/658408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.