Cited by 201Menstrual Health and DisordersYouth Substance Use and School AttendancePoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Menstruation and School Absenteeism: Evidence from Rural Malawi

Open access
Grant, Monica, Lloyd, Cynthia, Mensch, Barbara·2013·Comparative Education Review

Abstract

The provision of toilets and menstrual supplies has emerged as a promising programmatic strategy to support adolescent girls' school attendance and performance in less developed countries. We use the first round of the Malawi Schooling and Adolescent Survey (MSAS) to examine the individual- and school-level factors associated with menstruation-related school absenteeism. The MSAS is a school-based longitudinal survey of adolescent students enrolled in coed public primary schools in the southern districts of Machinga and Balaka who were aged 14-16 in 2007. Although one-third of female students report missing at least one day of school at their last menstrual period, our data suggest that menstruation only accounts for a small proportion of all female absenteeism and does not create a gender gap in absenteeism. We find no evidence for school-level variance in menstruation-related absenteeism, suggesting that absenteeism is not sensitive to school environments. Rather, co-residence with a grandmother and spending time on school work at home reduce the odds of absence during the last menstrual period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/669121

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most quantitative studies have not found an association between menstruation and school attendance.

    “Most quantitative studies have not found an association between menstruation and school attendance [12, 13, 20, 21]”

    From Menstrual health and school absenteeism among adolescent girls in Uganda (MENISCUS): a feasibility study (2018) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Menstruation and Schooling section says few studies have quantified the effect using attendance data, but the study it identifies found girls significantly more likely to be absent on menstrual days. The Discussion also reports that one-third of the Malawi sample missed at least one day during their last menstrual period. The paper describes a small effect, not a pattern of quantitative studies finding no association; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both qualitative and quantitative work has suggested that poor menstrual hygiene management results in school absenteeism, distraction, and disengagement.

    “Both qualitative and quantitative work has suggested that poor MHM results in school absenteeism, distraction, and disengagement.[6,7]”

    From Do Menstrual Hygiene Management Interventions Improve Education and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women and Girls in Low and Middle Income Countries? A Systematic Review (2016) · cites this paper as [7]

    The “Menstruation and Schooling” section reports qualitative accounts linking menstruation to attendance and classroom participation, alongside a quantitative study finding a small attendance effect. But this paper’s Results find no association between school sanitation facilities and menstruation-related absenteeism; its Discussion says a possible effect on concentration was not examined. It does not establish that poor menstrual hygiene management causes distraction or disengagement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Qualitative studies in LMIC settings demonstrate that taboos and negative attitudes, including shame and secrecy, contribute to unhygienic practices and school absenteeism.

    “This finding is consistent with those from qualitative studies in LMIC settings which demonstrate that taboos and negative attitudes, including shame and secrecy, contribute to unhygienic practices and school absenteeism [4,33]”

    From Menstrual hygiene management and school absenteeism among adolescent students in Indonesia: evidence from a cross-sectional school-based survey (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

    The “Menstruation and Schooling” section discusses girls’ fear that menstruation will be discovered and suggests that inadequate privacy and water may affect attendance and hygiene. But this paper analyzes survey data, not qualitative studies, and it does not demonstrate that taboos, shame, or secrecy cause unhygienic practices and absenteeism. The Discussion also says perceived toilet privacy appears to have little association with menstruation-related absenteeism. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Limited studies to date have shown minimal effect of quantitative associations with school absence in relation to MHM, despite strong qualitative evidence from girls' narratives.

    “Lastly, while policy makers have called for increased measurement of school attendance, dropout, and educational attainment in relation to MHM, demonstrating quantitative associations with school absence in limited studies to date has shown minimal effect [5,33,34], despite strong qualitative evidence from girls’ narratives [4,7,17,26,35].”
  • Similar levels of absenteeism reported by boys and girls have been seen in other settings.

    “and this has been seen in other settings [20, 22, 23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Malawi Institute of Education 2008 Life Skills and Sexual and Reproductive Health Education 1 and 2 Malawi Institute of Education Press Domasi, Malawi
  2. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (NRC-IOM) Lloyd Cynthia B 2005 Growing Up Global: The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries. Panel on Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries Committee on Population and Board on Children, Youth, and Families. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education Washington, D.C The National Academies Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, M., Lloyd, C., & Mensch, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Population Council (IN)
Venue
Comparative Education Review
Published
2013-05
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
260-284
ISSN
  • 0010-4086 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-701X
OpenAlex
W2066959016
Cited by
201
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comparative Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD062155, R24HD047873)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
menstruation, school absenteeism, adolescent girls, menstrual hygiene management, school toilets, rural Malawi, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review