Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis
Abstract
Partisans often perceive real world conditions in a manner that credits their own party. Yet recent findings suggest that partisans are capable of setting their loyalties aside when confronted with clear evidence, for example, during an economic crisis. This study examines a different possibility. While partisans may acknowledge the same reality, they may find other ways of aligning undeniable realities with their party loyalties. Using monthly survey data collected before and after the unexpected collapse of the British national economy (2004–10), this study presents one key finding: As partisans came to agree that economic conditions had gotten much worse, they conversely polarized in whether they thought the government was responsible. While the most committed partisans were surprisingly apt in acknowledging the economic collapse, they were also the most eager to attribute responsibility selectively. For that substantial share of the electorate, partisan-motivated reasoning seems highly adaptive.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even when partisans accurately assess economic performance, they selectively assign blame and responsibility to protect leaders from their party.
“Bisgaard (2019) shows that even when partisans accurately assess economic performance, they selectively assign blame and responsibility to protect leaders from their party (also see Bisgaard, 2015).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bisgaard, 2015
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jerit, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?
Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220944364 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Peterson, E., & Iyengar, S. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/pmn7h · Cited by 241 · see citing works
“Bartels concluded partisans’ perceptions of the economy, rather than reflecting real-world conditions, showed “substantial partisan bias” (p. 136; see also Scha↵ner and Roche, 2016; Bisgaard, 2015).”
BackgroundHow to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Smith, A., & Johns, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04318-1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Partisan bias and citizen satisfaction, confidence, and trust in the U.S. Federal Government
Morgeson III, F. V., Sharma, P. N., Sharma, U., & Hult, G. T. M. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1945667 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Political surveys bias self‐reported economic perceptions
Bailey, J. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab054 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bisgaard, M.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bisgaard, Martin
- ORCID
- Bisgaard, Martin
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 849-860
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W1996226230
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 82.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- partisan motivated reasoning, economic perceptions, blame attribution, economic crisis, 2008 financial crisis, UK economy, political polarization, political affiliation, government responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review