Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy
Abstract
Party identification is generally considered the most powerful predictor of voting behavior. Yet, after 50 years of research, scholars continue to disagree over the implications of this well-known finding. Some argue that party identification constitutes a stable affective attachment that voters are motivated to defend, whereas others argue that party identification constitutes a running tally of voters’ objective evaluations. Thus, party identification may serve as a pervasive source of bias that undermines accountability or as an indispensable shortcut that makes it easier for voters to hold government accountable. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind seeks to advance the literature beyond this impasse by relaxing the motivational assumptions underlying the literature’s two dominant models. The books’ dual motivations model allows partisans to act like loyal fans who are motivated to maintain allegiance to their team and also like good citizens who are motivated to hold parties accountable. The nature of party identification and its implications for democracy hinge on the interplay between these two motivational forces. Results show that when people disagree with their party’s issue positions, they attempt to develop justifications for maintaining their party identity. This allows them to fulfill their motivation to remain loyal without appearing to be bad citizens whose judgment is clouded by partisan bias. Of course, identity justification requires cognitive resources,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Directional goals seem prevalent in many political contexts.
“While debate continues about the extent to which directional goals manifest (e.g., Druckman, 2012;Druckman & McGrath, 2019;Guess & Coppock, 2020), they seem prevalent in many political contexts (Bolsen et al., 2014;Groenendyk, 2013;Groenendyk & Krupnikov, 2021;Lavine et al., 2012;Leeper & Slothuus, 2014;Lodge & Taber, 2013).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Groenendyk, 2013
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation
Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12164 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Bisgaard, M. (2015) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/681591 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?
Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfy014 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness
Nicholson, S. P., Coe, C. M., Emory, J., & Song, A. V. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Bakker, B. N., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Malka, A. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/707616 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning
Bisgaard, M. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12432 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Mullinix, K. J. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9318-4 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects
Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Moving beyond panaceas in fisheries governance
Young, O. R., Webster, D. G., Cox, M. E., Raakjær, J., Blaxekjær, L. Ø., Einarsson, N., Virginia, R. A., Acheson, J., Bromley, D. W., Cardwell, E., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716545115 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
How Norms Shape the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
Groenendyk, E. W., Kimbrough, E. O., & Pickup, M. A. (2022) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12717 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationBartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation
Groenendyk, E., & Krupnikov, Y. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12562 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationGroenendyk, E. W. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12481 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationEconomists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments
Johnston, C. D., & Ballard, A. M. O. (2016) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/684629 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A. H., Moynihan, D. P., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muy001 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Individual Differences in Group Loyalty Predict Partisan Strength
Clifford, S. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9367-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Malka, A., & Adelman, M. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721004096 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship
Lee, A. H., Yphtach Lelkes, B., Hawkins, C. B., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Expressive Politics as (Costly) Norm Following
Pickup, M. A., Kimbrough, E. O., & de Rooij, E. A. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09667-6 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The case for partisan motivated reasoning
Williams, D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04223-1 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Motivated reasoning and democratic accountability
LITTLE, A. T., SCHNAKENBERG, K. E., & TURNER, I. R. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421001209 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Emotion and Political Judgment
Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Woodson, B. W. (2015) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912915593644 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Winners, Losers, and Perceptions of Vote (Mis)Counting
Kernell, G., & Mullinix, K. J. (2017) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx021 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Party–Group Ambivalence and Voter Loyalty: Results From Three Experiments
Shufeldt, G. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x17705854 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Operational Ideology and Party Identification
Chen, P. G., & Goren, P. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916658551 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., & Zinger, J. F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2952510 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Presidential Debates, Partisan Motivations, and Political Interest
Mullinix, K. J. (2015) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12187 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-Esteem and the Development of Partisan Identity
Wolak, J., & Stapleton, C. E. (2019) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912919851556 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Conditional Motivated Reasoning
Dickerson, B. T., & Ondercin, H. L. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916684031 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Christensen, J. (2018) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12520 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Civic Duty and Political Preference Formation
Mullinix, K. J. (2017) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912917729037 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship
Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12480 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Lerusse, A., & de Walle, S. V. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2085777 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Political surveys bias self‐reported economic perceptions
Bailey, J. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab054 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Stark, S., & Collignon, S. (2021) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/1478929921995333 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages
Ryan, T. J., & Brader, T. A. (2015) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.62 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The paradox of poor representation: How voter–party incongruence curbs affective polarisation
Marchal, N., & Watson, D. (2021) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481211048502 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Economists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy JudgmentsPreprint
Johnston, C. D., & Ballard, A. M. O. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2479439 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Leeper, T. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0237 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
DeMora, S. L., Merolla, J. L., Newman, B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09912-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Priming Norms to Combat Affective Polarization
Mullinix, K. J., & Lythgoe, T. J. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129211073319 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kiil, F. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12929 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gordon, S. L., Struwig, J., & Roberts, B. J. (2017) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/02589346.2017.1357913 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Civic education’s relationship to affective partisan divides later in life
Clark, C. H. (2021) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979211041332 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Predicting Acceptance of Mormons as Christians by Religion and Party Identity
Smith, D. T. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw022 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Learning from the Past: Pandemics and the Governance Treadmill
Webster, D. G., Aytur, S., Axelrod, M., Wilson, R. S., Hamm, J. A., Sayed, L., Pearson, A. L., Torres, P. H. C., Akporiaye, A., & Young, O. R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063683 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Looking Back, Looking Forward: ISPP at 40 and Future Directions for Political Psychology
Reynolds, K. J. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12509 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Stoddard, J. D., & Chen, J. (2018) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1504790 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Gendered Ambivalence: The Structure of Attitudes About Female Candidates
Bauer, N. M. (2023) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2023.2257122 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
‘Thin’ loyalty and declining attachment to the African National Congress
Braun, M. (2024) · Commonwealth and Comparative Politics · doi:10.1080/14662043.2024.2324522 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gratale, S. K., Sangalang, A., Maloney, E. K., & Cappella, J. N. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16193554 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chen, P. G., & Luttig, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1651319 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gonthier, F. (2020) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-020-00148-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Moral Leadership in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Kidd, W. C., & Vitriol, J. A. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12782 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
How agenda setting works: A dual path model and motivated reasoning
Lee, N. Y. (2019) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884919851882 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pulling for the Team: Competition Between Political Partisans
Huang, L., DeScioli, P., & Murad, Z. (2021) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-020-00272-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
van Holm, E. J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3594967 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Partisans like any other? How populist supporters assess the economy when their party is in office
Gonthier, F. (2023) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773923000206 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Of Parochial Partisanship and Education: Towards Civic Duty or Polarization?
Asekere, G., & Amanor-Lartey, E. T. (2021) · Journal of Politics and Law · doi:10.5539/jpl.v15n1p7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The counter-theatricality of right-wing populist performance
Peetz, J. (2021) · Studies in Theatre and Performance · doi:10.1080/14682761.2021.1964818 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Political Belief Systems Are Not Singularly Rooted in Alliance Psychology
Malka, A., & Federico, C. M. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274423 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kiil, F. (2025) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2025.10001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Attitudes Surrounding Fairness and Competition in Sports Predict Choices to Partisan Gerrymander
Izatt, H. J., & Fuller, S. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10086-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Understanding Policy Attitudes: Effect of Affective Source Cues on Political Reasoning
Hrbková, L. (2016) · Masarykova univerzita eBooks · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8056-2016 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Groenendyk, E. W. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.835691 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Evidence on the Role of Identity and Interest in Voting BehaviorPreprint
Pickup, M. A., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2851135 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Klein, T., & Shammas, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.005
Klein, T., & Shammas, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.008
An Introduction to Partisan Warfare
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.002
General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.004
Ballots in a Partisan Civil War
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.007
The Guardians of Judicial Independence
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.001
A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.003
Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.007
The Deeply Involved Are Different
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.005
Pavlović, Z. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3939575
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.011
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.008
A House Divided against Itself?
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.002
Subtleties of Partisan Division
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.003
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.012
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.006
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.004
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.010
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.009
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.013
Perceptions of the Most Sacred Duty
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.007
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.001
Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.002
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.009
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.012
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.009
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.001
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.013
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.015
- Authors
- Groenendyk, E.
- Corresponding author
- Groenendyk, Eric
- ORCID
- Groenendyk, Eric
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-08-15
- OpenAlex
- W4237539593
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- party identification, voting behavior, partisan bias, cognitive resources, partisan disagreement, democratic accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
