Cited by 43Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFire effects on ecosystems

Legacy effects of wildfire on stream thermal regimes and rainbow trout ecology: an integrated analysis of observation and individual-based models

Rosenberger, Amanda E., Dunham, Jason B., Neuswanger, Jason R., Railsback, Steven F.·2015·Freshwater Science

Abstract

Management of aquatic resources in fire-prone areas requires understanding of fish species’ responses to wildfire and of the intermediate- and long-term consequences of these disturbances. We examined Rainbow Trout populations in 9 headwater streams 10 y after a major wildfire: 3 with no history of severe wildfire in the watershed (unburned), 3 in severely burned watersheds (burned), and 3 in severely burned watersheds subjected to immediate events that scoured the stream channel and eliminated streamside vegetation (burned and reorganized). Results of a previous study of this system suggested the primary lasting effects of this wildfire history on headwater stream habitat were differences in canopy cover and solar radiation, which led to higher summer stream temperatures. Nevertheless, trout were present throughout streams in burned watersheds. Older age classes were least abundant in streams draining watersheds with a burned and reorganized history, and individuals >1 y old were most abundant in streams draining watersheds with an unburned history. Burned history corresponded with fast growth, low lipid content, and early maturity of Rainbow Trout. We used an individual-based model of Rainbow Trout growth and demographic patterns to determine if temperature interactions with bioenergetics and competition among individuals could lead to observed phenotypic and ecological differences among populations in the absence of other plausible mechanisms. Modeling suggested that moderate warming associated with wildfire and channel disturbance history leads to faster individual growth, which exacerbates competition for limited food, leading to decreases in population densities. The inferred mechanisms from this modeling exercise suggest the transferability of ecological patterns to a variety of temperature-warming scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/683338

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenberger, A. E., Dunham, J. B., Neuswanger, J. R., & Railsback, S. F.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rosenberger, Amanda E.
  • Dunham, Jason B.
  • Neuswanger, Jason R.
  • Railsback, Steven F.
Venue
Freshwater Science
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1571-1584
ISSN
  • 2161-9549 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-9565
OpenAlex
W1655439139
Cited by
43
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Freshwater Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
rainbow trout, stream thermal regime, headwater streams, stream temperature, canopy cover, solar radiation, agent-based modeling, fish growth, lipid content, early maturity, intraspecific competition, population density, bioenergetics, age structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review