Cited by 12Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsAmphibian and Reptile Biology

Temperature Influences on Hatchling Caiman crocodilus Distress Calls

Garrick, Leslie D., Garrick, Rita Anne·1978·Physiological Zoology

Abstract

Hatchling Caiman crocodilus fuscus were tested for their tendency to emit a distress call and show an extension reflex as they were held by the base of the tail at cloacal temperatures (Tc) ranging from 7 to 36 C. The low Tc threshold for the distress call was about 9 C and for the extension reflex, 9.9 C. There is no apparent upper Tc threshold for the distress call. However, no vocalizations were emitted above 33 C, perhaps because gular pulsations overrode their expression. The duration of the distress call, which consists of three or four distinct bands between 0.2 and 2.4 kHz, and the duration of the intercall interval both decreased with increasing Tc. In contrast, repetition rate was stable over a broad range of Tc (18–33 C), and the spectral composition of the calls also was unchanged over a range of 12.8–33.0 C. Temperature independence of sound energy distribution and stability of repetition rate are deemed adaptations which reduce the ambiguity in the distress call signal to the receiver, provided that the auditory system of the receiver is similarly responsive to temperacure. Low-temperature functioning of neuromuscular systems would appear to be advantageous for small crocodilians, whose body temperature fluctuates more than the body temperature of larger animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/physzool.51.2.30157859

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contexts for hissing in crocodylians are highly variable and include aggression, defence and courtship.

    “Additionally, the contexts for hissing in crocodylians are highly variable and include aggression, defence and courtship (Garrick and Lang 1977; Garrick et al. 1978; Wang et al. 2007; Dinets 2010).”
  • Differences in acoustic signalling syntax may allow species identification and potentially contain contextual, individual and/or behavioural information.

    “Differences in acoustic signalling syntax (i.e., the sequence of signal elements) may allow species identification and potentially contain contextual, individual and/or behavioural information (Garrick et al. 1978; Kershenbaum et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrick, L. D., & Garrick, R. A.
Venue
Physiological Zoology
Published
1978-04
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
105-113
ISSN
0031-935X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318109022
Cited by
12
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physiological Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
Caiman crocodilus fuscus, distress calls, vocalizations, body temperature, cloacal temperature, call duration, repetition rate, spectral composition, signal ambiguity, auditory system, neuromuscular function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review