Cited by 219Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Accessscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Authors and open access publishing

Swan, Alma, Brown, Sheridan·2004·Learned Publishing

Abstract

Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self‐archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not published in an open access journal attributed that to unfamiliarity with such journals. Forty per cent of authors have self‐archived their traditional journal articles and almost twice as many say they would do so if required to.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1087/095315104323159649

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swan, A., & Brown, S.
Affiliations
Key Perspectives Ltd
Corresponding author
  • Swan, Alma
  • Brown, Sheridan
Venue
Learned Publishing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
219-224
ISSN
  • 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4857
OpenAlex
W1969232170
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
90.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • CogPrints (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
open access publishing, author awareness, self-archiving, open access journals, research impact, research funding, author attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review