FOMALHAUT'S DEBRIS DISK AND PLANET: CONSTRAINING THE MASS OF FOMALHAUT B FROM DISK MORPHOLOGY
Open accessAbstract
Following the optical imaging of exoplanet candidate Fomalhaut b (Fom b), we present a numerical model of how Fomalhaut's debris disk is gravitationally shaped by a single interior planet. The model is simple, adaptable to other debris disks, and can be extended to accommodate multiple planets. If Fom b is the dominant perturber of the belt, then to produce the observed disk morphology it must have a mass M pl < 3 M J , an orbital semimajor axis a pl > 101.5 AU, and an orbital eccentricity e pl = 0.11–0.13. These conclusions are independent of Fom b's photometry. To not disrupt the disk, a greater mass for Fom b demands a smaller orbit farther removed from the disk; thus, future astrometric measurement of Fom b's orbit, combined with our model of planet–disk interaction, can be used to determine the mass more precisely. The inner edge of the debris disk at a ≈ 133 AU lies at the periphery of Fom b's chaotic zone, and the mean disk eccentricity of e ≈ 0.11 is secularly forced by the planet, supporting predictions made prior to the discovery of Fom b. However, previous mass constraints based on disk morphology rely on several oversimplifications. We explain why our constraint is more reliable. It is based on a global model of the disk that is not restricted to the planet's chaotic zone boundary. Moreover, we screen disk parent bodies for dynamical stability over the system age of ∼ 100 Myr, and model them separately from their dust grain progeny; the latter's orbits are strongly affected by radiation pressure and their lifetimes are limited to ∼ 0.1 Myr by destructive grain–grain collisions. The single planet model predicts that planet and disk orbits be apsidally aligned. Fomalhaut b's nominal space velocity does not bear this out, but the astrometric uncertainties may be large. If the apsidal misalignment proves real, our calculated upper mass limit of 3 M J still holds. If the orbits are aligned, our model predicts M pl = 0.5 M J , a pl = 115 AU, and e pl = 0.12. Parent bodies are evacuated from mean-motion resonances with Fom b; these empty resonances are akin to the Kirkwood gaps opened by Jupiter. The belt contains at least 3 M ⊕ of solids that are grinding down to dust, their velocity dispersions stirred so strongly by Fom b that collisions are destructive. Such a large mass in solids is consistent with Fom b having formed in situ.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For ξ = 0.2 this gives a planet mass ratio of 2 × 10^-5 and for ξ = 0.1 of 2 × 10^-4, hence ranging from Saturn to Neptune mass and lower than estimated by Chiang et al. (2009) but consistent with that predicted by Quillen (2006).
“For ξ = 0.2 this gives a planet mass ratio of 2 × 10 -5 and for ξ = 0.1 of 2 × 10 -4 , hence ranging from Saturn to Neptune mass and lower than estimated by Chiang et al. (2009) but consistent with that predicted by Quillen (2006).”
From PLANETARY CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN OCCULTATION: DISCOVERY OF AN EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEM TRANSITING A YOUNG SUN-LIKE STAR AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR DETECTING ECLIPSES BY CIRCUMSECONDARY AND CIRCUMPLANETARY DISKS (2012) · cites this paper as Chiang et al. (2009)
The Summary (section 4.1; page unavailable) gives Chiang et al.'s conservative constraint as less than 3 Jupiter masses, an upper limit above the Saturn-to-Neptune masses in the citing sentence. It does not estimate a specific mass above that range; the paper also models a 0.1-Jupiter-mass planet (Table 1). Thus the comparison with Chiang's upper limit is supported, but saying the proposed range is lower than Chiang's estimated mass overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174817 · Cited by 2,956 · see citing works
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-2093 · Cited by 1,929 · see citing works
Durisen, R. H., Boss, A. P., Mayer, L., Nelson, A., Quinn, T., & Rice, K. (2005) · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
Radiation forces on small particles in the solar system
Burns, J. A., Lamy, P., & Soter, S. L. (1979) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Collisional model of asteroids and their debris
Dohnanyi, J. S. (1969) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb074i010p02531 · Cited by 1,220 · see citing works
Symplectic maps for the n-body problem
Wisdom, J., & Holman, M. J. (1991) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/115978 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Optical Images of an Exosolar Planet 25 Light-Years from Earth
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., Fitzgerald, M. P., Clampin, M., Kite, E. S., Stapelfeldt, K., Marois, C., & Krist, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166609 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
Self-citationWisdom, J. (1980) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/112778 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Submillimetre images of dusty debris around nearby stars
Holland, W. S., Greaves, J. S., Zuckerman, B., Webb, R. A., McCarthy, C., Coulson, I. M., Walther, D. M., Dent, W. R. F., Gear, W. K., & Robson, I. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33874 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Formation of the Galilean Satellites: Conditions of Accretion
Canup, R. M., & Ward, W. R. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/344684 · Cited by 433 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is not clear, however, how such a disk would survive for the system age of ∼100 Myr; protosatellite disks are thought to evolve on timescales shorter than a few Myr (e.g., Canup & Ward 2002; Mosqueira & Estrada 2003).”
BackgroundAccretion of the gaseous envelope of Jupiter around a 5–10 Earth-mass core
Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P. H., & Lissauer, J. J. (2005) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.06.021 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Chaotic behavior and the origin of the 31 Kirkwood gap
Wisdom, J. (1983) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(83)90127-6 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
The Poynting-Robertson effect on meteor orbits
Wyatt, S. P., & Whipple, F. L. (1950) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145244 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
A model of accretion disks in close binaries
Paczyński, B. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155526 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
A planetary system as the origin of structure in Fomalhaut's dust belt
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03601 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Self-citationWyatt, M. C., Dermott, S. F., Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Grogan, K., Holmes, E. K., & Pina, R. K. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308093 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The Dynamics of Planetary Rings
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. D. (1982) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.001341 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Collisions and Gravitational Reaccumulation: Forming Asteroid Families and Satellites
Patrick Michel, B., Benz, W., Tanga, P., & Richardson, D. C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065189 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Beyond the T Dwarfs: Theoretical Spectra, Colors, and Detectability of the Coolest Brown Dwarfs
Burrows, A. S., Sudarsky, D., & Lunine, J. I. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377709 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
The origin of the Kirkwood gaps - A mapping for asteroidal motion near the 3/1 commensurability
Wisdom, J. (1982) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/113132 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Lodders, K. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/589942 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Mosqueira, I., & Estrada, P. R. (2003) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/s0019-1035(03)00076-9 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
A perturbative treatment of motion near the 3/1 commensurability
Wisdom, J. (1985) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(85)90011-9 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Wyatt, M. C., Dermott, S. F., Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Grogan, K., Holmes, E., & Piña, R. K. (1999) · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Strubbe, L. E., & Chiang, E. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/505736 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationThe insignificance of P-R drag in detectable extrasolar planetesimal belts
Wyatt, M. C. (2005) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042073 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Direct Imaging and Spectroscopy of a Planetary-Mass Candidate Companion to a Young Solar Analog
Lafrèniere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & van Kerkwijk, M. V. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/595870 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
The long-term evolution of orbits in the solar system: A mapping approach
Duncan, M. J., Quinn, T., & Tremaine, S. D. (1989) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90047-x · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Predictions for a planet just inside Fomalhaut's eccentric ring
Quillen, A. C. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00216.x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Thébault, P., & Wu, Y. (2008) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079133 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Ages of A‐Type Vega‐like Stars fromuvbyβ Photometry
Song, I., Caillault, J. P., Barrado, D., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/318269 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Chaotic zone boundary for low free eccentricity particles near an eccentric planet
Quillen, A. C., & Faber, P. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11122.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
GQ Lup B Visible and Near-Infrared Photometric Analysis
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/511071 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Outer edges of debris discs: how sharp is sharp?Preprint
Thébault, P., & Wu, Y. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0801.3724 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Age of Gliese 879 and Fomalhaut
Barrado, D., Stauffer, J. R., Hartmann, L. W., et al. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303518 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lithwick, Y., & Chiang, E. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510280 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE WARPED PLANE OF THE CLASSICAL KUIPER BELT
Chiang, E., & Choi, H. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/350 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationDiffusive low optical depth particle discs truncated by planets
Quillen, A. C. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11690.x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
“Generally speaking, coherent dynamical structures in particle disks can either be sustained by self-gravity (Tremaine 1998; Touma et al. 2009) or by gravitational shepherding facilitated by an extrinsic perturber (Goldreich & Tremaine 1982; Chiang et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSTIS CORONAGRAPHIC IMAGING OF FOMALHAUT: MAIN BELT STRUCTURE AND THE ORBIT OF FOMALHAUT<i>b</i>
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Clampin, M. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/56 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationMamajek, E. E., Quillen, A. C., Pecaut, M. J., Moolekamp, F., Scott, E. L., Kenworthy, M. A., Cameron, A. C., & Parley, N. R. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/3/72 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“For ξ = 0.2 this gives a planet mass ratio of 2 × 10−5 and for ξ = 0.1 of 2 × 10−4 so planet masses ranging from Saturn to Neptune mass and lower than estimated by Chiang et al. (2009) but consistent with that predicted by Quillen (2006).”
Influential
- Authors
- Chiang, E., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chiang, E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 693
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 734-749
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2099499874
- Semantic Scholar
- 22b543b547e63f18693bd5f8fda21e528c803a3e
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- Fomalhaut b, planet-disk interaction, disc morphology, gravitational perturbations, mean motion resonance, Kirkwood gaps, chaotic zone, apsidal alignment, grain-grain collisions, radiation pressure, exoplanet candidates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review