Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FIRST RESULTS FROM THE CATALINA REAL-TIME TRANSIENT SURVEY

Open access
Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., Beshore, E., Larson, S., Graham, M. J., Williams, R., Christensen, E., Catelan, M., Boattini, A., Gibbs, A., Hill, R., Kowalski, R.·2009·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report on the results from the first six months of the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS). In order to search for optical transients (OTs) with timescales of minutes to years, the CRTS analyses data from the Catalina Sky Survey which repeatedly covers 26,000 of square degrees on the sky. The CRTS provides a public stream of transients that are bright enough to be followed up using small telescopes. Since the beginning of the survey, all CRTS transients have been made available to astronomers around the world in real time using HTML tables,RSS feeds, and VOEvents. As part of our public outreach program, the detections are now also available in Keyhole Markup Language through Google Sky. The initial discoveries include over 350 unique OTs rising more than 2 mag from past measurements. Sixty two of these are classified as supernovae (SNe), based on light curves, prior deep imaging and spectroscopic data. Seventy seven are due to cataclysmic variables (CVs; only 13 previously known), while an additional 100 transients were too infrequently sampled to distinguish between faint CVs and SNe. The remaining OTs include active galactic nucleus, blazars, high-proper-motions stars, highly variable stars (such as UV Ceti stars), and transients of an unknown nature. Our results suggest that there is a large population of SNe missed by many current SN surveys because of selection biases. These objects appear to be associated with faint host galaxies. We also discuss the unexpected discovery of white dwarf binary systems through dramatic eclipses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1086/191333 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adelman-McCarthy, 2008, ApJS, 175, 297, 10.1086/524984 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Akerlof, 2000, ApJ, 119, 1901, 10.1086/301321 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1086/345490 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Alcock, 2000, ApJ, 542, 281, 10.1086/309512 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11442.x · DOI
  7. Becker, 2004, ApJ, 611, 418, 10.1086/421994 · DOI
  8. 10.1086/115714 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bianchi, 2007, ApJS, 173, 659, 10.1086/516648 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/asna.200710946 · doi:10.1002/asna.200710946
  11. 10.1086/529209 · doi:10.1086/529209
  12. 10.1051/0004-6361:20042002 · DOI
  13. Djorgovski, 2004, GCN Obs. Rep. 2851
  14. Djorgovski, 2007, Atel
  15. 10.1002/asna.200710948 · DOI
  16. Djorgovski, 2008, Atel
  17. Djorgovski, 2008, Atel
  18. Djorgovski, 2008, Atel
  19. Drake, 1999, ApJ, 521, 602, 10.1086/307593 · doi:10.1086/307593
  20. Drake, 2003, ApJ, 589, 1020, 10.1086/374714 · DOI
  21. Drake, 2007, BAAS, 39, 805
  22. Drake, 2007, Atel
  23. Drake, 2008, Atel
  24. Drake, 2008, Atel
  25. Drake, 2008, Atel
  26. Drake, 2008, Atel
  27. Drake, 2008, Atel
  28. Drake, 2008, Atel
  29. Drake, 2008, Atel
  30. Drake, 2008, Atel
  31. Eisenstein, 2006, ApJS, 167, 40, 10.1086/507110 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Filippenko, 2001, Small-Telescope Astronomy on Global Scales, 121
  33. Freed, 2003, ApJ, 584, 453, 10.1086/345533 · doi:10.1086/345533
  34. Freedman, 2001, ApJ, 553, 47, 10.1086/320638 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Frieman, 2008, AJ, 135, 338, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/338 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Gal-Yam, 2003, AJ, 125, 1087, 10.1086/346141 · DOI
  37. Gal-Yam, 2008, ApJ, 680, 550, 10.1086/587680 · DOI
  38. Glikman, 2008, Atel
  39. Harrison, 2004, ApJ, 127, 460, 10.1086/380228 · doi:10.1086/380228
  40. Helmbolt, 2007, ApJ, 658, 2003
  41. 10.1002/asna.200410300 · DOI
  42. Huber, 2006, AJ, 132, 633, 10.1086/505300 · DOI
  43. Ivezic, 2002, AJ, 124, 2364, 10.1086/344069 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11442.x · DOI
  45. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Keller, 2007, PASA, 24, 1, 10.1071/AS07001 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1086/316264 · doi:10.1086/316264
  48. Kulkarni, 2006, ApJ, 644, L63, 10.1086/505423 · doi:10.1086/505423
  49. Larson, 2003, DPS, 35, 3604
  50. López-Morales, 2007, ApJ, 660, 732, 10.1086/513142 · doi:10.1086/513142
  51. Mahabal, 2008, Atel
  52. 10.1002/asna.200710943 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12603.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12603.x
  54. Martin, 2005, ApJ, 619, 1, 10.1086/426387 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Miller, 2009, ApJ, 690, 1303, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1303 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Modjaz, 2008, AJ, 135, 1136, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1136 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Monard, 2003, Mon. Notes Astron. Soc. South Africa, 62, 131
  58. Morokuma, 2008, ApJ, 676, 163, 10.1086/527467 · DOI
  59. 10.1086/316623 · DOI
  60. Pignata, 2007, CBET, 1114, 1
  61. Pojmanski, 2001, Small-Telescope Astronomy on Global Scales, 53
  62. Poznanski, 2002, ApJ, 114, 833
  63. Prieto, 2008, ApJ, 673, 999, 10.1086/524654 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1051/0004-6361:20054317 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054317
  65. Rau, 2007, ApJ, 664, 474, 10.1086/518759 · doi:10.1086/518759
  66. Richards, 2002, AJ, 123, 2945, 10.1086/340187 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Rykoff, 2005, ApJ, 631, 1032, 10.1086/432832 · DOI
  68. Sand, 2008, AJ, 135, 1917, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1917 · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1917
  69. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07252.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07252.x
  70. Schweizer, 2008, AJ, 136, 1482, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/4/1482 · DOI
  71. Silvestri, 2006, AJ, 131, 1674, 10.1086/499494 · DOI
  72. Smith, 2007, ApJ, 666, 1116, 10.1086/519949 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Stanek, 2006, Acta Astron., 56, 333
  74. Steinfadt, 2008, ApJ, 677, L113, 10.1086/588022 · doi:10.1086/588022
  75. Szkody, 2002, AJ, 123, 430, 10.1086/324734 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Szkody, 2003, AJ, 126, 1499, 10.1086/377346 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Szkody, 2004, AJ, 128, 1882, 10.1086/423997 · DOI
  78. Szkody, 2005, AJ, 129, 2386, 10.1086/429595 · DOI
  79. Szkody, 2006, AJ, 131, 973, 10.1086/499308 · DOI
  80. Szkody, 2007, AJ, 134, 185, 10.1086/518506 · DOI
  81. 10.1086/118228 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Totani, 2005, ApJ, 621, 9, 10.1086/429087 · DOI
  83. 10.1086/187342 · doi:10.1086/187342
  84. 10.1086/426792 · DOI
  85. Webb, 2000, ApJ, 540, 652, 10.1086/309341 · DOI
  86. Welsh, 2007, ApJS, 173, 673, 10.1086/516640 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.newar.2003.12.056 · DOI
  88. York, 2002, AJ, 120, 1579, 10.1086/301513 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Yost, 2007, ApJ, 669, 1107, 10.1086/521668 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,271

Metadata

Authors
Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., Beshore, E., Larson, S., Graham, M. J., Williams, R., Christensen, E., Catelan, M., Boattini, A., Gibbs, A., Hill, R., & Kowalski, R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-04-20
Volume
696
Issue
1
Pages
870-884
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2133620426
Cited by
1,271
References
2
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FIRST RESULTS FROM THE CATALINA REAL-TIME TRANSIENT SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870
The paper
Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., Beshore, E., Larson, S., Graham, M. J., Williams, R., Christensen, E., Catelan, M., Boattini, A., Gibbs, A., Hill, R., & Kowalski, R. (2009). FIRST RESULTS FROM THE CATALINA REAL-TIME TRANSIENT SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.