Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE WEAK s-PROCESS IN MASSIVE STARS AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE NEUTRON CAPTURE CROSS SECTIONS

Open access
Pignatari, M., Gallino, R., Heil, M., Wiescher, M., Käppeler, F., Herwig, F., Bisterzo, S.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The slow neutron capture process in massive stars (weak s process) produces most of the s -process isotopes between iron and strontium. Neutrons are provided by the 22 Ne(α,n) 25 Mg reaction, which is activated at the end of the convective He-burning core and in the subsequent convective C-burning shell. The s -process-rich material in the supernova ejecta carries the signature of these two phases. In the past years, new measurements of neutron capture cross sections of isotopes beyond iron significantly changed the predicted weak s -process distribution. The reason is that the variation of the Maxwellian-averaged cross sections (MACS) is propagated to heavier isotopes along the s path. In the light of these results, we present updated nucleosynthesis calculations for a 25 M ☉ star of Population I (solar metallicity) in convective He-burning core and convective C-burning shell conditions. In comparison with previous simulations based on the Bao et al. compilation, the new measurement of neutron capture cross sections leads to an increase of s -process yields from nickel up to selenium. The variation of the cross section of one isotope along the s -process path is propagated to heavier isotopes, where the propagation efficiency is higher for low cross sections. New 74 Ge, 75 As, and 78 Se MACS result in a higher production of germanium, arsenic, and selenium, thereby reducing the s -process yields of heavier elements by propagation. Results are reported for the He core and for the C shell. In shell C-burning, the s -process nucleosynthesis is more uncertain than in the He core, due to higher MACS uncertainties at higher temperatures. We also analyze the impact of using the new lower solar abundances for CNO isotopes on the s -process predictions, where CNO is the source of 22 Ne, and we show that beyond Zn this is affecting the s -process yields more than nuclear or stellar model uncertainties considered in this paper. In particular, using the new updated initial composition, we obtain a high s -process production (overproduction higher than 16 O, ∼100) for Cu, Ga, Ge, and As. Using the older abundances by Anders & Grevesse, also Se, Br, Kr, and Rb are efficiently produced. Our results have important implications in explaining the origin of copper in the solar abundance distribution, pointing to a prevailing contribution from the weak s -process in agreement with spectroscopic observations and Galactic chemical evolution calculations. Because of the improvement due to the new MACS for nickel and copper isotopes, the nucleosynthesis of copper is less affected by nuclear uncertainties compared to heavier s -process elements. An experimental determination of the 63 Ni MACS is required for a further improvement of the abundance prediction of copper. The available spectroscopic observations of germanium and gallium in stars are also discussed, where most of the cosmic abundances of these elements derives from the s -process in massive stars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/1557

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.064601 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.73.064601
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.015806 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.015806
  3. 10.1086/153254 · doi:10.1086/153254
  4. Asplund, 2005, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 25
  5. Baraffe, 1992, A&A, 258, 357
  6. 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00645-0 · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)00645-0
  7. 10.1086/171251 · doi:10.1086/171251
  8. 10.1051/0004-6361:20035913 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035913
  9. 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.049 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.049
  10. Busso, 1985, A&A, 151, 205
  11. 10.1016/S1387-6473(02)00183-5 · doi:10.1016/s1387-6473(02)00183-5
  12. Chieffi, 2006, Int. Symp. on Nuclear Astrophysics-Nuclei in the Cosmos IX, PoS(NIC-IX)250
  13. Coquard, 2006, Int. Symp. on Nuclear Astrophysics-Nuclei in the Cosmos IX, PoS(NIC-IX)274
  14. 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01267-2 · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(01)01267-2
  15. Costa, 2000, A&A, 358, L67
  16. 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90421-3 · doi:10.1016/0375-9474(77)90421-3
  17. 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.020 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.020
  18. Dillmann, 2006, Int. Symp. on Nuclear Astrophysics-Nuclei in the Cosmos IX
  19. 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00312-2 · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(00)00312-2
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.062802 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.67.062802
  21. 10.1071/AS08064 · doi:10.1071/as08064
  22. 10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.12.013 · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.12.013
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.015808 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.015808
  24. Heil, 2005, Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 1362, 10.1063/1.1945257 · doi:10.1063/1.1945257
  25. Ivans, 2006, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 77, 979
  26. Kippenhahn, 1990, Sky Telesc., 80, 504
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevC.38.295 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.38.295
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevC.39.1655 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.39.1655
  29. 10.1016/j.newar.2008.06.015 · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.06.015
  30. Langer, 1989, A&A, 210, 187
  31. Langer, 1985, A&A, 145, 179
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.025801 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.025801
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.065802 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.065802
  34. Matteucci, 1993, A&A, 272, 421
  35. Meyer, 2000, ApJ, 540, L49, 10.1086/312865 · doi:10.1086/312865
  36. Mutti, 2005, Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 1327, 10.1063/1.1945250 · doi:10.1063/1.1945250
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.092504 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.092504
  38. 10.1016/0370-1573(88)90032-4 · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90032-4
  39. Palme, 1993, Landolt Börnstein Group VI, Astronomy and Astrophysics 2A, 196, 10.1007/10057790_56 · doi:10.1007/10057790_56
  40. Pignatari, 2008, First Stars III, 336
  41. 10.1007/978-3-540-34136-9_103 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34136-9_103
  42. Prantzos, 1990, A&A, 234, 211
  43. Primas, 2008, Evolution and Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars, 230
  44. Rayet, 2000, A&A, 354, 740
  45. Reifarth, 2000, ApJ, 528, 573, 10.1086/308175 · doi:10.1086/308175
  46. 10.1086/173042 · doi:10.1086/173042
  47. 10.1086/166935 · doi:10.1086/166935
  48. Sneden, 1991, A&A, 246, 354
  49. Tinsley, 1980, Fundam. Cosm. Phys., 5, 287
  50. Ugalde, 2008, 10th Symp. on Nuclei in the Cosmos
  51. Wagemans, 1995, Nuclei in the Cosmos III, 169
  52. 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.009 · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.009

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Pignatari, M., Gallino, R., Heil, M., Wiescher, M., Käppeler, F., Herwig, F., & Bisterzo, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
710
Issue
2
Pages
1557-1577
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2014019250
Cited by
388
References
95
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE WEAK s-PROCESS IN MASSIVE STARS AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE NEUTRON CAPTURE CROSS SECTIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/1557
The paper
Pignatari, M., Gallino, R., Heil, M., Wiescher, M., Käppeler, F., Herwig, F., & Bisterzo, S. (2010). THE WEAK s-PROCESS IN MASSIVE STARS AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE NEUTRON CAPTURE CROSS SECTIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/1557

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.