The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INNOVATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF CHANDRA-ACIS OBSERVATIONS
Open accessAbstract
As members of the instrument team for the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and as Chandra General Observers, we have developed a wide variety of data analysis methods that we believe are useful to the Chandra community, and have constructed a significant body of publicly available software (the ACIS Extract package) addressing important ACIS data and science analysis tasks. This paper seeks to describe these data analysis methods for two purposes: to document the data analysis work performed in our own science projects and to help other ACIS observers judge whether these methods may be useful in their own projects (regardless of what tools and procedures they choose to implement those methods). The ACIS data analysis recommendations we offer here address much of the workflow in a typical ACIS project, including data preparation, point source detection via both wavelet decomposition and image reconstruction, masking point sources, identification of diffuse structures, event extraction for both point and diffuse sources, merging extractions from multiple observations, nonparametric broadband photometry, analysis of low-count spectra, and automation of these tasks. Many of the innovations presented here arise from several, often interwoven, complications that are found in many Chandra projects: large numbers of point sources (hundreds to several thousand), faint point sources, misaligned multiple observations of an astronomical field, point source crowding, and scientifically relevant diffuse emission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/498708 · Cited by 12,019
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems
Argyle, R. W., Bunclark, P., & Lewis, J. R. (2008) · Cited by 4,399
An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions
Lucy, L. B. (1974) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/111605 · Cited by 3,866 · cited 2×
“We search for faint and crowded sources by locating peaks in reconstructed images obtained with the Lucy–Richardson algorithm (Lucy 1974), implemented in the IDL Astronomy User’s Library.44 Similar image reconstructions have been invaluable for achieving effective spatial resolution as good as ∼0.”
BackgroundMethodInterval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion
Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2001) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009213286 · Cited by 3,538
Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio
Cash, W. (1979) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/156922 · Cited by 3,083
Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data
Gehrels, N. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164079 · Cited by 2,412
Adaptive spatial binning of integral-field spectroscopic data using Voronoi tessellations
Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x · Cited by 1,309
CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system
Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., Brickhouse, N. S., Burke, D. J., Davis, J. E., Durham, N., Elvis, M., Galle, E. C., Harris, D. E., et al. (2006) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.671760 · Cited by 1,295
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV
Shaw, R. A., Payne, H. E., & Hayes, J. J. E. (1995) · Cited by 925
Advanced CCD imaging spectrometer (ACIS) instrument on the Chandra X-ray Observatory
Garmire, G. P., Bautz, M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A., & Ricker, Jr. (2003) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.461599 · Cited by 776
Self-citation
Cited by
Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Hsu, L., Rangel, C., Brightman, M., Merloni, A., Salvato, M., Donley, J., & Kocevski, D. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 · Cited by 1,644
The stellar rotation–activity relationship in fully convective M dwarfs
Wright, N. J., Newton, E. R., Williams, P. K. G., Drake, J. J., & Yadav, R. K. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1670 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Broos, P. S., Townsley, L. K., Feigelson, E. D., Getman, K. V., Bauer, F. E., & Garmire, G. P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 714
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1582-1605
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2042767877
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INNOVATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF CHANDRA-ACIS OBSERVATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1582
- The paper
- Broos, P. S., Townsley, L. K., Feigelson, E. D., Getman, K. V., Bauer, F. E., & Garmire, G. P. (2010). INNOVATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF CHANDRA-ACIS OBSERVATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.