The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ASSESSING THE MILKY WAY SATELLITES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXY
Open accessAbstract
Numerical models of the tidal disruption of the Sagittarius (Sgr) dwarf galaxy have recently been developed that for the first time simultaneously satisfy most observational constraints on the angular position, distance, and radial velocity trends of both leading and trailing tidal streams emanating from the dwarf. We use these dynamical models in combination with extant three-dimensional position and velocity data for Galactic globular clusters and dSph galaxies to identify those Milky Way satellites that are likely to have originally formed in the gravitational potential well of the Sgr dwarf, and have been stripped from Sgr during its extended interaction with the Milky Way. We conclude that the globular clusters Arp 2, M 54, NGC 5634, Terzan 8, and Whiting 1 are almost certainly associated with the Sgr dwarf, and that Berkeley 29, NGC 5053, Pal 12, and Terzan 7 are likely to be as well (albeit at lower confidence). The initial Sgr system therefore may have contained five to nine globular clusters, corresponding to a specific frequency S N = 5–9 for an initial Sgr luminosity M V = −15.0. Our result is consistent with the 8 ± 2 genuine Sgr globular clusters expected on the basis of statistical modeling of the Galactic globular cluster distribution and the corresponding false-association rate due to chance alignments with the Sgr streams. The globular clusters identified as most likely to be associated with Sgr are consistent with previous reconstructions of the Sgr age–metallicity relation, and show no evidence for a second-parameter effect shaping their horizontal branch morphologies. We find no statistically significant evidence to suggest that any of the recently discovered population of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies are associated with the Sgr tidal streams, but are unable to rule out this possibility conclusively for all systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the simulations of Law & Majewski (2010) and Niederste-Ostholt et al. (2012) suggest that it has been undergoing intense tidal disruption for the past 4 7 Gyr.”
From Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations (2020) · cites this paper as Law & Majewski (2010)
Citations
Cites
A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Harris, W. E. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118116 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 2×
“Only two globular clusters are found in the Harris (1996) catalog at distances rGC > 100 kpc; E 1 and Pal 4 at distances of rGC = 123 and 112 kpc respectively.”
BackgroundGalactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375
A dwarf satellite galaxy in Sagittarius
Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M. J. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370194a0 · Cited by 1,381
Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie, M. F., Weinberg, M. D., & Ostheimer, J. C. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/379504 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citationThe Kinematics of the Ultra‐faint Milky Way Satellites: Solving the Missing Satellite Problem
Simon, J. D., & Geha, M. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/521816 · Cited by 974
The Field of Streams: Sagittarius and Its Siblings
Belokurov, V. A., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., Gilmore, G. F., Vidrih, S., Bramich, D. M., Newberg, H. J., Wyse, R. F. Ġ., Irwin, M. J., Fellhauer, M., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/504797 · Cited by 910
Cats and Dogs, Hair and a Hero: A Quintet of New Milky Way Companions
Belokurov, V. A., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., Kleyna, J. T., Koposov, S. E., Hodgkin, S. T., Irwin, M. J., Gilmore, G. F., Wilkinson, M. I., Fellhauer, M., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/509718 · Cited by 800
Extragalactic Globular Clusters and Galaxy Formation
Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092441 · Cited by 792
Destruction of the Galactic Globular Cluster System
Gnedin, O. Y., & Ostriker, J. P. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303441 · Cited by 581
THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY: A MODEL FOR EVOLUTION IN A TRIAXIAL MILKY WAY HALO
Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 · Cited by 550
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- D’Onghia, 2009, The Magellanic System: Star, Gas, and Galaxies, 473
- Forbes, 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1203
- Forbes, 2000, A&A, 358, 471
- Irwin, 1999, The Stellar Content of Local Group Galaxies, 409
- Kaluzny, 1994, A&AS, 108, 151
- Law, 2004, Satellites and Tidal Streams, 239
- Martínez Delgado, 2004, Satellites and Tidal Streams, 255
- Scholz, 1998, A&A, 333, 531
- Zinn, 1993, The Globular Cluster-Galaxy Connection, 38
- Zinn, 1993, The Globular Cluster-Galaxy Connection, 302
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Gaia DR2 view of the open cluster population in the Milky Way
Cantat-Gaudin, T., Jordi, C., Vallenari, A., Bragaglia, A., Balaguer-Núñez, L., Soubiran, C., Bossini, D., Moitinho, A., Castro-Ginard, A., Krone-Martins, A., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833476 · Cited by 750
Evidence for two early accretion events that built the Milky Way stellar halo
Myeong, G. C., Vasiliev, E., Iorio, G., Evans, N. W., & Belokurov, V (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1770 · Cited by 505
Gaia EDR3 view on galactic globular clusters
Vasiliev, E., & Baumgardt, H. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 · Cited by 492
Origin of the system of globular clusters in the Milky Way
Massari, D., Koppelman, H. H., & Helmi, A. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 · Cited by 441
Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way
Helmi, A. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- ORCID
- Law, David R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 718
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1128-1150
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2079032472
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, Milky Way satellites, tidal currents, globular clusters, tidal disruption, ultra-faint dwarf galaxies, specific frequency, age-metallicity relation, horizontal branch morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review