Cited by 1,381Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

A dwarf satellite galaxy in Sagittarius

Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G., Irwin, M. J.·1994·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/370194a0

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Royal Observatory in Greenwich (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1994-07
Volume
370
Issue
6486
Pages
194-196
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1971056876
Cited by
1,381
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 32
FWCI
23.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, dwarf satellite galaxies, Milky Way satellites, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Galactic Center, tidal disruption, tidal tails, Milky Way accretion history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review