Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MAIN BELT ASTEROIDS WITH WISE/NEOWISE. I. PRELIMINARY ALBEDOS AND DIAMETERS

Open access
Masiero, Joseph R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri, R. M., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., McMillan, R. S., Spahr, T. B., Skrutskie, M. F., Tholen, D., Walker, R. G., Wright, E. L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., Wilkins, A.·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present initial results from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ( WISE ), a four-band all-sky thermal infrared survey that produces data well suited for measuring the physical properties of asteroids, and the NEOWISE enhancement to the WISE mission allowing for detailed study of solar system objects. Using a NEATM thermal model fitting routine, we compute diameters for over 100,000 Main Belt asteroids from their IR thermal flux, with errors better than 10%. We then incorporate literature values of visible measurements (in the form of the H absolute magnitude) to determine albedos. Using these data we investigate the albedo and diameter distributions of the Main Belt. As observed previously, we find a change in the average albedo when comparing the inner, middle, and outer portions of the Main Belt. We also confirm that the albedo distribution of each region is strongly bimodal. We observe groupings of objects with similar albedos in regions of the Main Belt associated with dynamical breakup families. Asteroid families typically show a characteristic albedo for all members, but there are notable exceptions to this. This paper is the first look at the Main Belt asteroids in the WISE data, and only represents the preliminary, observed raw size, and albedo distributions for the populations considered. These distributions are subject to survey biases inherent to the NEOWISE data set and cannot yet be interpreted as describing the true populations; the debiased size and albedo distributions will be the subject of the next paper in this series.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/68

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri, R. M., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., McMillan, R. S., Spahr, T. B., Skrutskie, M. F., Tholen, D., Walker, R. G., Wright, E. L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., & Wilkins, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-10-17
Volume
741
Issue
2
Pages
68
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2088624593
Cited by
444
References
37
FWCI
17.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAIN BELT ASTEROIDS WITH WISE/NEOWISE. I. PRELIMINARY ALBEDOS AND DIAMETERS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/68
The paper
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri, R. M., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., McMillan, R. S., Spahr, T. B., Skrutskie, M. F., Tholen, D., Walker, R. G., Wright, E. L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., & Wilkins, A. (2011). MAIN BELT ASTEROIDS WITH WISE/NEOWISE. I. PRELIMINARY ALBEDOS AND DIAMETERS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/68

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.