Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SHORT-LIVED STAR-FORMING GIANT CLUMPS IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OF z≈ 2 DISKS

Open access
Genel, Shy, Naab, Thorsten, Genzel, Reinhard, Förster Schreiber, Natascha M., Sternberg, Amiel, Oser, Ludwig, Johansson, Peter H., Davé, Romeel, Oppenheimer, Benjamin D., Burkert, Andreas·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Many observed massive star-forming z ≈ 2 galaxies are large disks that exhibit irregular morphologies, with ≈1 kpc, ≈10 8 –10 10 M ⊙ clumps. We present the largest sample to date of high-resolution cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations that zoom-in on the formation of individual M * ≈ 10 10.5 M ⊙ galaxies in ≈10 12 M ⊙ halos at z ≈ 2. Our code includes strong stellar feedback parameterized as momentum-driven galactic winds. This model reproduces many characteristic features of this observed class of galaxies, such as their clumpy morphologies, smooth and monotonic velocity gradients, high gas fractions ( f g ≈ 50%), and high specific star formation rates (≳1 Gyr −1 ). In accord with recent models, giant clumps ( M clump ≈ (5 × 10 8 –10 9 )M ⊙ ) form in situ via gravitational instabilities. However, the galactic winds are critical for their subsequent evolution. The giant clumps we obtain are short-lived and are disrupted by wind-driven mass loss. They do not virialize or migrate to the galaxy centers as suggested in recent work neglecting strong winds. By phenomenologically implementing the winds that are observed from high-redshift galaxies and in particular from individual clumps, our simulations reproduce well new observational constraints on clump kinematics and clump ages. In particular, the observation that older clumps appear closer to their galaxy centers is reproduced in our simulations, as a result of inside–out formation of the disks rather than inward clump migration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/11

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Genel, S., Naab, T., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Sternberg, A., Oser, L., Johansson, P. H., Davé, R., Oppenheimer, B. D., & Burkert, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-12-27
Volume
745
Issue
1
Pages
11
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2018665649
Cited by
181
References
3
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SHORT-LIVED STAR-FORMING GIANT CLUMPS IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OF z≈ 2 DISKS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/11
The paper
Genel, S., Naab, T., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Sternberg, A., Oser, L., Johansson, P. H., Davé, R., Oppenheimer, B. D., & Burkert, A. (2012). SHORT-LIVED STAR-FORMING GIANT CLUMPS IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OF z≈ 2 DISKS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.