The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
METALLICITY-DEPENDENT QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT IN SMALL GALAXIES
Open accessAbstract
The star formation rates (SFRs) of low-metallicity galaxies depend sensitively on the gas metallicity, because metals are crucial to mediating the transition from intermediate-temperature atomic gas to cold molecular gas, a necessary precursor to star formation. We study the impact of this effect on the star formation history of galaxies. We incorporate metallicity-dependent star formation and metal enrichment in a simple model that follows the evolution of a halo main progenitor. Our model shows that including the effect of metallicity leads to suppression of star formation at redshift z > 2 in dark halos with masses ≲ 10 11 M ☉ , with the suppression becoming near total for halos below ∼10 9.5 –10 10 M ☉ . We find that at high redshift, until z ∼ 2, the SFR cannot catch up with the gas inflow rate (IR), because the SFR is limited by the free-fall time, and because it is suppressed further by a lack of metals in small halos. As a result, in each galaxy the SFR is growing in time faster than the IR, and the integrated cosmic SFR density is rising with time. The suppressed in situ SFR at high- z makes the growth of stellar mass dominated by ex situ SFR, meaning stars formed in lower mass progenitor galaxies and then accreted, which implies that the specific SFR (sSFR) remains constant with time. The intensely accreted gas at high- z is accumulating as an atomic gas reservoir. This provides additional fuel for star formation in 10 10 –10 12 M ☉ halos at z ∼ 1–3, which allows the SFR to exceed the instantaneous IR, and may enable an even higher outflow rate. At z < 1, following the natural decline in IR with time due to the universal expansion, the SFR and sSFR are expected to drop. We specify the expected dependence of sSFR and metallicity on stellar mass and redshift. At a given z , and below a critical mass, these relations are predicted to be flat and rising, respectively. Our model predictions qualitatively match some of the puzzling features in the observed star formation history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
The origin of dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation
Dekel, A., & Silk, J. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164050 · Cited by 1,919 · cited 1×
“Proposed mechanisms include photoionization by the UV background (see the review by Loeb & Barkana 2001), and stellar feedback by supernovae (Dekel & Silk 1986) or radiation pressure (Thompson et al. 2005; Murray et al. 2010; Hopkins et al. 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTHE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN NEARBY GALAXIES: MEASURING WHERE GAS FORMS STARS EFFECTIVELY
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 · Cited by 1,919
Cited by
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Krumholz, M. R. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 · Cited by 321
Self-citationA unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport
Krumholz, M. R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J. C., & Crocker, R. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty852 · Cited by 319
Self-citationThe current status of galaxy formation
Silk, J., & Mamon, G. A. (2012) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/8/004 · Cited by 294
Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out
Tacchella, S., Dekel, A., Carollo, C. M., Ceverino, D., DeGraf, C., Lapiner, S., Mandelker, N., & Primack, J. R. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw303 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Krumholz, M. R., & Dekel, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-06-11
- Volume
- 753
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2016999385
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: METALLICITY-DEPENDENT QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT IN SMALL GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/16
- The paper
- Krumholz, M. R., & Dekel, A. (2012). METALLICITY-DEPENDENT QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT IN SMALL GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.