Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out

Open access
Tacchella, Sandro, Dekel, Avishai, Carollo, C. Marcella, Ceverino, Daniel, DeGraf, Colin, Lapiner, Sharon, Mandelker, Nir, Primack, Joel R.·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Using cosmological simulations, we address the interplay between structure and star formation in high-redshift galaxies via the evolution of surface density profiles. Our sample consists of 26 galaxies evolving in the redshift range z = 7 − 1, spanning the stellar mass range (0.2–6.4) × 1010 M⊙ at z = 2. We recover the main trends by stacking the profiles in accordance to their evolution phases. Following a wet compaction event that typically occurs when the stellar mass is ∼109.5 M⊙ at z ∼ 2–4, the gas develops a cusp inside the effective radius, associated with a peak in star formation rate (SFR). The SFR peak and the associated feedback, in the absence of further gas inflow to the centre, marks the onset of gas depletion from the central 1 kpc, leading to quenching of the central SFR. An extended, star-forming ring that forms by fresh gas during the central quenching process shows as a rising specific SFR (sSFR) profile, which is interpreted as inside-out quenching. Before quenching, the stellar density profile grows self-similarly, maintaining its log–log shape because the sSFR is similar at all radii. During the quenching process, the stellar density saturates to a constant value, especially in the inner 1 kpc. The stellar mass and SFR profiles deduced from observations show very similar shapes, consistent with the scenario of wet compaction leading to inside-out quenching and the subsequent saturation of a dense stellar core. We predict a cuspy gas profile during the blue nugget phase, and a gas-depleted core, sometimes surrounded by a ring, in the post-blue nugget phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stw303

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 149 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Tacchella, S., Dekel, A., Carollo, C. M., Ceverino, D., DeGraf, C., Lapiner, S., Mandelker, N., & Primack, J. R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
458
Issue
1
Pages
242-263
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1917783267
Cited by
293
References
149
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stw303
The paper
Tacchella, S., Dekel, A., Carollo, C. M., Ceverino, D., DeGraf, C., Lapiner, S., Mandelker, N., & Primack, J. R. (2016). Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.