Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COMPARING SINGLE-EPOCH VIRIAL BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATORS FOR LUMINOUS QUASARS

Open access
Shen, Yue, Liu, Xin·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Single-epoch virial black hole (BH) mass estimators utilizing broad emission lines have been routinely applied to high-redshift quasars to estimate their BH masses. Depending on the redshift, different line estimators (Hα, Hβ, Mg ii λ2798, C iv λ1549) are often used with optical/near-infrared spectroscopy. Here, we use a homogeneous sample of 60 intermediate-redshift ( z ∼ 1.5–2.2) Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars with optical and near-infrared spectra covering C iv through Hα to investigate the consistency between different single-epoch virial BH mass estimators. We critically compare rest-frame UV line estimators (C iv λ1549, C iii ] λ1908, and Mg ii λ2798) with optical estimators (Hβ and Hα) in terms of correlations between line widths and between continuum/line luminosities, for the high-luminosity regime ( L 5100 > 10 45.4 erg s −1 ) probed by our sample. The continuum luminosities of L 1350 and L 3000 , and the broad-line luminosities are well correlated with L 5100 , reflecting the homogeneity of quasar spectra in the rest-frame UV–optical, among which L 1350 and the line luminosities for C iv and C iii ] have the largest scatter in the correlation with L 5100 . We found that the Mg ii FWHM correlates well with the FWHMs of the Balmer lines and that the Mg ii line estimator can be calibrated to yield consistent virial mass estimates with those based on the Hβ/Hα estimators, thus extending earlier results on less luminous objects. The C iv FWHM is poorly correlated with the Balmer line FWHMs, and the scatter between the C iv and Hβ FWHMs consists of an irreducible part (∼0.12 dex), and a part that correlates with the blueshift of the C iv centroid relative to that of Hβ, similar to earlier studies comparing C iv with Mg ii . The C iii ] FWHM is found to correlate with the C iv FWHM, and hence is also poorly correlated with the Hβ FWHM. While the C iv and C iii ] lines can be calibrated to yield consistent virial mass estimates as Hβ on average, the scatter is substantially larger than Mg ii , and the usage of C iv /C iii ] FWHM in the mass estimators does not improve the agreement with the Hβ estimator. We discuss controversial claims in the literature on the correlation between C iv and Hβ FWHMs, and suggest that the reported correlation is either a result based on small samples or only valid for low-luminosity objects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/125

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Shen, Y., & Liu, X.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-06-21
Volume
753
Issue
2
Pages
125
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2056937219
Cited by
279
References
66
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARING SINGLE-EPOCH VIRIAL BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATORS FOR LUMINOUS QUASARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/125
The paper
Shen, Y., & Liu, X. (2012). COMPARING SINGLE-EPOCH VIRIAL BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATORS FOR LUMINOUS QUASARS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.