Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CLASH: THREE STRONGLY LENSED IMAGES OF A CANDIDATE z≈ 11 GALAXY

Open access
Coe, Dan, Zitrin, Adi, Carrasco, Mauricio, Shu, Xinwen, Zheng, Wei, Postman, Marc, Bradley, Larry, Koekemoer, Anton, Bouwens, Rychard, Broadhurst, Tom, Monna, Anna, Host, Ole, Moustakas, Leonidas A., Ford, Holland, Moustakas, John, van der Wel, Arjen, Donahue, Megan, Rodney, Steven A., Benítez, Narciso, Jouvel, Stephanie, Seitz, Stella, Kelson, Daniel D., Rosati, Piero·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a candidate for the most distant galaxy known to date with a photometric redshift of z = 10.7 +0.6 −0.4 (95% confidence limits; with z < 9.5 galaxies of known types ruled out at 7.2σ). This J -dropout Lyman break galaxy, named MACS0647-JD, was discovered as part of the Cluster Lensing and Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH). We observe three magnified images of this galaxy due to strong gravitational lensing by the galaxy cluster MACSJ0647.7+7015 at z = 0.591. The images are magnified by factors of ∼80, 7, and 2, with the brighter two observed at ∼26th magnitude AB (∼0.15 μJy) in the WFC3/IR F160W filter (∼1.4–1.7 μm) where they are detected at ≳12σ. All three images are also confidently detected at ≳6σ in F140W (∼1.2–1.6 μm), dropping out of detection from 15 lower wavelength Hubble Space Telescope filters (∼0.2–1.4 μm), and lacking bright detections in Spitzer /IRAC 3.6 μm and 4.5 μm imaging (∼3.2–5.0 μm). We rule out a broad range of possible lower redshift interlopers, including some previously published as high-redshift candidates. Our high-redshift conclusion is more conservative than if we had neglected a Bayesian photometric redshift prior. Given CLASH observations of 17 high-mass clusters to date, our discoveries of MACS0647-JD at z ∼ 10.8 and MACS1149-JD at z ∼ 9.6 are consistent with a lensed luminosity function extrapolated from lower redshifts. This would suggest that low-luminosity galaxies could have reionized the universe. However, given the significant uncertainties based on only two galaxies, we cannot yet rule out the sharp drop-off in number counts at z ≳ 10 suggested by field searches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/32

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Coe, D., Zitrin, A., Carrasco, M., Shu, X., Zheng, W., Postman, M., Bradley, L., Koekemoer, A., Bouwens, R., Broadhurst, T., Monna, A., Host, O., Moustakas, L. A., Ford, H., Moustakas, J., van der Wel, A., Donahue, M., Rodney, S. A., Benítez, N., Jouvel, S., Seitz, S., Kelson, D. D., & Rosati, P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-12-13
Volume
762
Issue
1
Pages
32
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2023842147
Cited by
374
References
5
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLASH: THREE STRONGLY LENSED IMAGES OF A CANDIDATE z≈ 11 GALAXY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/32
The paper
Coe, D., Zitrin, A., Carrasco, M., Shu, X., Zheng, W., Postman, M., Bradley, L., Koekemoer, A., Bouwens, R., Broadhurst, T., Monna, A., Host, O., Moustakas, L. A., Ford, H., Moustakas, J., van der Wel, A., Donahue, M., Rodney, S. A., Benítez, N., . . . Rosati, P. (2013). CLASH: THREE STRONGLY LENSED IMAGES OF A CANDIDATE z≈ 11 GALAXY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/32

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.