Cited by 78Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

OHMIC HEATING SUSPENDS, NOT REVERSES, THE COOLING CONTRACTION OF HOT JUPITERS

Open access
Wu, Yanqin, Lithwick, Yoram·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We study the radius evolution of close-in extra-solar Jupiters under Ohmic heating, a mechanism that was recently proposed to explain the large observed sizes of many of these planets. Planets are born with high entropy and they subsequently cool and contract. We focus on two cases: first, that Ohmic heating commences when the planet is hot (high entropy); and second, that it commences after the planet has cooled. In the former case, we use analytical scaling and numerical experiments to confirm that Ohmic heating is capable of suspending the cooling as long as a few percent of the stellar irradiation is converted into Ohmic heating and the planet has a surface wind that extends to pressures of ∼10 bar or deeper. For these parameters, the radii at which cooling is stalled are consistent with (or larger than) the observed radii of most planets. The only two exceptions are WASP-17b and HAT-P-32b. In contrast to the high entropy case, we show that Ohmic heating cannot significantly re-inflate planets after they have already cooled. This leads us to suggest that the diversity of radii observed in hot Jupiters may be partially explained by the different epochs at which they are migrated to their current locations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/13

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disk migration naturally delivers the hot Jupiter close to its star before it cools on a ~10 Myr timescale.

    “Disk migration-which by definition occurs early in the planet's lifetimenaturally delivers the hot Jupiter close to its star before it cools on a ∼ 10 Myr timescale (e.g., Spiegel & Burrows 2012, Wu & Lithwick 2013).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Wu & Lithwick 2013

    Section 2.3 (page not provided) says the example planet TrES-4b would cool to its measured radius in less than 10 Myr if it evolved in isolation. But the paper does not establish that disk migration delivers hot Jupiters before they cool; Section 3 discusses migration that can bring them close to their stars after substantial contraction, from a few million to a few billion years after formation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Heating mechanisms that decay with depth, such as ohmic dissipation, have extremely long re-inflation timescales and are unable to re-inflate a Jupiter within the star's lifetime if it cools before arrival.

    “An important caveat is that heating mechanisms that decay with depth, such as the commonly invoked stellar irradiation deposition mechanism of ohmic dissipation (e.g., Batygin & Stevenson 2010), have extremely long re-inflation timescales and are unable to re-inflate a Jupiter within the star's lifetime if it cools before arrival (e.g., Ginzburg & Sari 2016; see also Wu & Lithwick 2013”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Wu & Lithwick 2013

    Section 3 reports that Ohmic heating is shallow and can re-inflate an already cooled planet by at most about 10%; its WASP-17b-like model is mildly re-inflated after 5 Gyr. This supports the difficulty of substantial re-inflation after cooling, but the paper does not establish a stellar-lifetime limit or the same result for heating mechanisms generally. The claim's absolute wording also overlooks the mild re-inflation the paper reports. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. 1994, ApJ, 437, 879 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anderson, D. R., Smith, A. M. S., Lanotte, A. A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2108 · DOI
  3. Arras, P., & Bildsten, L. 2006, ApJ, 650, 394 · DOI
  4. Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2008, A&A, 482, 315 · DOI
  5. Batygin, K., & Stevenson, D. J. 2010, ApJL, 714, 238 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Batygin, K., Stevenson, D. J., & Bodenheimer, P. H. 2011, ApJ, 738, 1 · DOI
  7. Bodenheimer, P., Lin, D. N. C., & Mardling, R. A. 2001, ApJ, 548, 466 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., & Hubbard, W. B. 2007, ApJ, 661, 502 · DOI
  9. Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M., & Salaris, M. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1094 · DOI
  10. Chabrier, G., & Baraffe, I. 2007, ApJ, 661, L81 · DOI
  11. Draine, B. T., Roberge, W. G., & Dalgarno, A. 1983, ApJ, 264, 485 · DOI
  12. Enoch, B., Cameron, A. C., Anderson, D. R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1631 · DOI
  13. Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 · DOI
  14. Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 623, 585 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hartman, J. D., Bakos, G. Á., Torres, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 59 · DOI
  16. Huang, X., & Cumming, A. 2012, ApJ, 757, 47 · DOI
  17. Laughlin, G., Crismani, M., & Adams, F. C. 2011, ApJL, 729, 7 · DOI
  18. Lian, Y., & Showman, A. P. 2008, Icar, 194, 597 · DOI
  19. Liu, J., & Schneider, T. 2010, JAtS, 67, 3652 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Menou, K. 2012, ApJ, 745, 138 · DOI
  21. Nagasawa, M., Ida, S., & Bessho, T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 498 · DOI
  22. Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3 · DOI
  23. Perna, R., Heng, K., & Pont, F. 2012, ApJ, 751, 59 · DOI
  24. Perna, R., Menou, K., & Rauscher, E. 2010a, ApJ, 719, 1421 · DOI
  25. Perna, R., Menou, K., & Rauscher, E. 2010b, ApJ, 724, 313 · DOI
  26. Rauscher, E., & Menou, K. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1334 · DOI
  27. Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713 · DOI
  28. Southworth, J. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2166 · DOI
  29. Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. 2011, ApJ, 735, 109 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wu, Y., & Murray, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 605 · DOI
  31. Youdin, A. N., & Mitchell, J. L. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1113 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
763
Issue
1
Pages
13
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2087667589
Cited by
78
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1109776)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Joule heating, hot Jupiters, radius inflation, planetary cooling, atmospheric circulation, surface winds, stellar irradiation, WASP-17b, planet migration, exoplanet radii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review