Cited by 208Astro and Planetary ScienceIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Constraints on deep seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and Saturn.

Open access
LIU, J, GOLDREICH, P, STEVENSON, D·2008·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.11.036

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coupling of the flow at depths at which the atmosphere is electrically conducting to the magnetic field is a plausible mechanism that generates MHD drag.

    “On the other hand, coupling of the flow at depths at which the atmosphere is electrically conducting to the magnetic field is a plausible mechanism that generates MHD drag (Liu et al. 2008; see also the appendix).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Liu et al. 2008

  • In the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow.

    “In the high-conductivity interior, the interaction of the magnetic field and the fluid flow produces Ohmic dissipation and retards the flow (Liu et al. 2008).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Liu et al. 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Liu, J. J. 2006. Interaction of magnetic field and zonal wind in the out shells of giant planets. Caltech Thesis 2006 , 47-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LIU, J., GOLDREICH, P., & STEVENSON, D.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Corresponding author
LIU, J
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
196
Issue
2
Pages
653-664
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978323643
Cited by
208
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
zonal wind, Jupiter, Saturn, Joule heating, planetary magnetic fields, electrical conductivity, magnetic Reynolds number, magnetic diffusivity, turbulent convection, equatorial jet, stable stratification, planetary atmospheres

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review