Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GAS KINEMATICS ON GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUD SCALES IN M51 WITH PAWS: CLOUD STABILIZATION THROUGH DYNAMICAL PRESSURE

Open access
Meidt, Sharon E., Schinnerer, Eva, García-Burillo, Santiago, Hughes, Annie, Colombo, Dario, Pety, Jérôme, Dobbs, Clare L., Schuster, Karl F., Kramer, Carsten, Leroy, Adam K., Dumas, Galle, Thompson, Todd A.·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use the high spatial and spectral resolution of the PAWS CO(1–0) survey of the inner 9 kpc of the iconic spiral galaxy M51 to examine the effects of gas streaming motions on the star-forming properties of individual giant molecular clouds (GMCs). We compare our view of gas flows in M51—which arise due to departures from axisymmetry in the gravitational potential (i.e., the nuclear bar and spiral arms)—with the global pattern of star formation as traced by Hα and 24 μm emission. We find that the dynamical environment of GMCs strongly affects their ability to form stars, in the sense that GMCs situated in regions with large streaming motions can be stabilized, while similarly massive GMCs in regions without streaming go on to efficiently form stars. We argue that this is the result of reduced surface pressure felt by clouds embedded in an ambient medium undergoing large streaming motions, which prevent collapse. Indeed, the variation in gas depletion time expected based on the observed streaming motions throughout the disk of M51 quantitatively agrees with the variation in the observed gas depletion time scale. The example of M51 shows that streaming motions, triggered by gravitational instabilities in the form of bars and spiral arms, can alter the star formation law; this can explain the variation in gas depletion time among galaxies with different masses and morphologies. In particular, we can explain the long gas depletion times in spiral galaxies compared with dwarf galaxies and starbursts. We suggest that adding a dynamical pressure term to the canonical free-fall time produces a single star formation law that can be applied to all star-forming regions and galaxies across cosmic time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/779/1/45

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., García-Burillo, S., Hughes, A., Colombo, D., Pety, J., Dobbs, C. L., Schuster, K. F., Kramer, C., Leroy, A. K., Dumas, G., & Thompson, T. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-11-25
Volume
779
Issue
1
Pages
45
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2106243938
Cited by
191
References
7
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GAS KINEMATICS ON GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUD SCALES IN M51 WITH PAWS: CLOUD STABILIZATION THROUGH DYNAMICAL PRESSURE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/779/1/45
The paper
Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., García-Burillo, S., Hughes, A., Colombo, D., Pety, J., Dobbs, C. L., Schuster, K. F., Kramer, C., Leroy, A. K., Dumas, G., & Thompson, T. A. (2013). GAS KINEMATICS ON GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUD SCALES IN M51 WITH PAWS: CLOUD STABILIZATION THROUGH DYNAMICAL PRESSURE. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/779/1/45

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.