The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VALIDATION OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE PLANET CANDIDATES. II. REFINED STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK AND DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
Open accessAbstract
We extend the statistical analysis performed by Lissauer et al. in 2012, which demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of Kepler candidate multiple transiting systems (multis) represents true transiting planets, and we develop therefrom a procedure to validate large numbers of planet candidates in multis as bona fide exoplanets. We show that this statistical framework correctly estimates the abundance of false positives already identified around Kepler targets with multiple sets of transit-like signatures based on their abundance around targets with single sets of transit-like signatures. We estimate the number of multis that represent split systems of one or more planets orbiting each component of a binary star system. We use the high reliability rate for multis to validate more than one dozen particularly interesting multi-planet systems herein. Hundreds of additional multi-planet systems are validated in a companion paper by Rowe et al. We note that few very short period ( P < 1.6 days) planets orbit within multiple transiting planet systems and discuss possible reasons for their absence. There also appears to be a shortage of planets with periods exceeding a few months in multis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/19 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationTHE FREQUENCY OF HOT JUPITERS ORBITING NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE STARS
Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., & Fischer, D. A. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/160 · Cited by 371 · cited 2×
“It may be that very close-in planets truly lack nearby planetary neighbors, as is the case for hot jupiters (Steffen et al. 2012, Wright et al. 2012), and/or that very close-in planets tend to have substantial orbital inclinations relative to more distant planets in their systems.”
BackgroundSelf-citationKepler constraints on planets near hot Jupiters
Steffen, J. H., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., Carter, J. A., Ford, E. B., Holman, M. J., Rowe, J. F., Welsh, W. F., Borucki, W. J., Boss, A. P., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1120970109 · Cited by 255
Self-citationA FIRST COMPARISON OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES IN SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SYSTEMS
Latham, D. W., Rowe, J. F., Quinn, S. N., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A., Carter, J. A., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/732/2/l24 · Cited by 188
Self-citationTwo Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Rowe, J. F., Charbonneau, D., Rogers, L. A., Ballard, S., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10780 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Cited by
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
Self-citationWeiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Winn, J. N., Isaacson, H. T., Morton, T. D., Hirsch, L. A., Sinukoff, E. J., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9ff6 · Cited by 328
Self-citationThe habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars
Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.003 · Cited by 319
Hot super-Earths stripped by their host stars
Lundkvist, M. S., Kjeldsen, H., Albrecht, S., Davies, G. R., Basu, S., Huber, D., Justesen, A. B., Karoff, C., Silva Aguirre, V., Van Eylen, V., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11201 · Cited by 258
Self-citationPLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . VI. PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1–Q16 (47 MONTHS)
Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., Rowe, J., Burke, C., Latham, D. W., Batalha, N. M., Bryson, S. T., Christiansen, J., Henze, C. E., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/31 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J. F., Jontof-Hutter, D., Agol, E., Borucki, W. J., Carter, J. A., Ford, E. B., Gilliland, R. L., Kolbl, R., Star, K. M., Steffen, J. H., & Torres, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-03-04
- Volume
- 784
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2048775090
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VALIDATION OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE PLANET CANDIDATES. II. REFINED STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK AND DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/44
- The paper
- Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J. F., Jontof-Hutter, D., Agol, E., Borucki, W. J., Carter, J. A., Ford, E. B., Gilliland, R. L., Kolbl, R., Star, K. M., Steffen, J. H., & Torres, G. (2014). VALIDATION OF KEPLER'S MULTIPLE PLANET CANDIDATES. II. REFINED STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK AND DESCRIPTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
