The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WHY BARYONS MATTER: THE KINEMATICS OF DWARF SPHEROIDAL SATELLITES
Open accessAbstract
We use high-resolution cosmological simulations of Milky Way (MW) mass galaxies that include both baryons and dark matter (DM) to show that baryonic physics (energetic feedback from supernovae and subsequent tidal stripping) significantly reduces the DM mass in the central regions of luminous satellite galaxies. The reduced central masses of the simulated satellites reproduce the observed internal dynamics of MW and M31 satellites as a function of luminosity. We use these realistic satellites to update predictions for the observed velocity and luminosity functions of satellites around MW-mass galaxies when baryonic effects are accounted for. We also predict that field dwarf galaxies in the same luminosity range as the MW classical satellites should not exhibit velocities as low as the satellites because the field dwarfs do not experience tidal stripping. Additionally, the early formation times of the satellites compared to field galaxies at the same luminosity may be apparent in the star formation histories of the two populations. Including baryonic physics in cold dark matter (CDM) models naturally explains the observed low DM densities in the MWs dwarf spheroidal population. Our simulations therefore resolve the tension between kinematics predicted in CDM theory and observations of satellites, without invoking alternative forms of DM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dark Matter Substructure within Galactic Halos
Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., & Tozzi, P. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312287 · Cited by 3,021
Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?
Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307643 · Cited by 2,741
DWARF GALAXIES OF THE LOCAL GROUP
Mateo, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 · Cited by 2,362
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes
Springel, V., Wang, J., Vogelsberger, M., Ludlow, A., Jenkins, A., Helmi, A., Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14066.x · Cited by 1,889
THE OBSERVED PROPERTIES OF DWARF GALAXIES IN AND AROUND THE LOCAL GROUP
McConnachie, A. W. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 · Cited by 1,869
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x · Cited by 1,394
Concentrations of Dark Halos from Their Assembly Histories
Wechsler, R. H., Bullock, J. S., Primack, J. R., Kravtsov, A. V., & Dekel, A. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/338765 · Cited by 1,220
Halo Formation in Warm Dark Matter Models
Bode, P., Ostriker, J. P., & Turok, N. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321541 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Constraining self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidals
Zavala, J., Vogelsberger, M., & Walker, M. G. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls053 · Cited by 409
Core formation in dwarf haloes with self-interacting dark matter: no fine-tuning necessary
Elbert, O. D., Bullock, J. S., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Rocha, M., Oñorbe, J., & Peter, A. H. G. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1470 · Cited by 306
ASSESSING ASTROPHYSICAL UNCERTAINTIES IN DIRECT DETECTION WITH GALAXY SIMULATIONS
Sloane, J. D., Buckley, M. R., Brooks, A. M., & Governato, F. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/93 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, A. M., & Zolotov, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-04-21
- Volume
- 786
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2045388443
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 135
- FWCI
- 22.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WHY BARYONS MATTER: THE KINEMATICS OF DWARF SPHEROIDAL SATELLITES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/87
- The paper
- Brooks, A. M., & Zolotov, A. (2014). WHY BARYONS MATTER: THE KINEMATICS OF DWARF SPHEROIDAL SATELLITES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.