Cited by 23Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Changes to Saturn's zonal-mean tropospheric thermal structure after the 2010–2011 northern hemisphere storm

Open access
Achterberg, R. K., Gierasch, P. J., Conrath, B. J., Fletcher, L. N., Hesman, B. E., Bjoraker, G. L., Flasar, F. M.·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use far-infrared (20-200 μm) data from the Composite Infrared Spectrometer on the Cassini spacecraft to determine the zonal-mean temperature and hydrogen para-fraction in Saturn's upper troposphere from observations taken before and after the large northern hemisphere storm in 2010-2011.During the storm, zonal mean temperatures in the latitude band between approximately 25 • N and 45 • N (planetographic latitude) increased by about 3 K, while the zonal mean hydrogen para-fraction decreased by about 0.04 over the same latitudes, at pressures greater than about 300 mbar.These changes occurred over the same latitude range as the disturbed cloud band seen in visible images.The observations are consistent with low para-fraction gas being brought up from the level of the water cloud by the strong convective plume associated with the storm, while being heated by condensation of water vapor, and then advected zonally by the winds near the plume tops in the upper troposphere.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/92

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holton, J. R. 2004, An Introduction to Dynamic Meterology (4th ed.; Amsterdam: Elsevier)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achterberg, R. K., Gierasch, P. J., Conrath, B. J., Fletcher, L. N., Hesman, B. E., Bjoraker, G. L., & Flasar, F. M.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-04-21
Volume
786
Issue
2
Pages
92
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2026748936
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX12AC24G)
  • University of Oxford
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Keywords
Saturn, upper troposphere, zonal mean temperature, far-infrared spectroscopy, Cassini, Composite Infrared Spectrometer, convective plumes, water vapor condensation, zonal wind, cloud bands, thermal structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review