Cited by 102Astro and Planetary ScienceIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena

Dynamics of Saturn's great storm of 2010–2011 from Cassini ISS and RPWS

Open access
Sayanagi, Kunio M., Dyudina, Ulyana A., Ewald, Shawn P., Fischer, Georg, Ingersoll, Andrew P., Kurth, William S., Muro, Gabriel D., Porco, Carolyn C. +1 more·2013·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.12.013

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dowling, T. E., Ingersoll, A. P., 1988. Potential vorticity and layer thickness variations in the flow around Jupiter's Great Red SPOT and White Oval BC. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 45, 1380-1396.
  2. Hesman, B. E., Bjoraker, G. L., Sada, P. V., Achterberg, R. K., Jennings, D. E., Lunsford, A. W., Romani, P. N., Fletcher, L. N., Boyle, R. J., Kerr, T., Sinclair, J. A., Nixon, C. A., Davis, G. R., Irwin, P. G. J., 2012a. Ethylene Emission in the Aftermath of Saturn's 2010 Northern Storm. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 44 of AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. p. 403.06.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sayanagi, K. M., Dyudina, U. A., Ewald, S. P., Fischer, G., Ingersoll, A. P., Kurth, W. S., Muro, G. D., Porco, C. C., & West, R. A.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Space Science Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Sayanagi, Kunio M.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
460-478
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047818412
Cited by
102
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Keywords
cumulus convection, string of pearls, lightning, storm dynamics, anticyclonic circulation, Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review