CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CONSTRAINING THE MILKY WAY'S HOT GAS HALO WITH O VII AND O VIII EMISSION LINES

Open access
Miller, Matthew J., Bregman, Joel N.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal
DOI 10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/14
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The Milky Way hosts a hot (≈2 × 10 6 K), diffuse, gaseous halo based on detections of z = 0 O vii and O viii absorption lines in quasar spectra and emission lines in blank-sky spectra. Here we improve constraints on the structure of the hot gas halo by fitting a radial model to a much larger sample of O vii and O viii emission line measurements from XMM-Newton /EPIC-MOS spectra compared to previous studies (≈650 sightlines). We assume a modified β-model for the halo density distribution and a constant-density Local Bubble from which we calculate emission to compare with the observations. We find an acceptable fit to the O viii emission line observations with (dof) = 1.08 (644) for best-fit parameters of cm −3 kpc 3β and β = 0.50 ± 0.03 for the hot gas halo and negligible Local Bubble contribution. The O vii observations yield an unacceptable (dof) = 4.69 (645) for similar best-fit parameters, which is likely due to temperature or density variations in the Local Bubble. The O viii fitting results imply hot gas masses of M (<50 kpc) = and M (<250 kpc) = , accounting for ≲50% of the Milky Way's missing baryons. We also explore our results in the context of optical depth effects in the halo gas, the halo gas cooling properties, temperature and entropy gradients in the halo gas, and the gas metallicity distribution. The combination of absorption and emission line analyses implies a sub-solar gas metallicity that decreases with radius, but that also must be ⩾0.3 Z ☉ to be consistent with the pulsar dispersion measure toward the Large Magellanic Cloud.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/14

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Asplund, 2005, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 25
  2. Brinkmann, 1997, A&A, 319, 413
  3. Mewe, 1995, Legacy, 6, 16
  4. Robertson, 2003, GeoRL, 30, 1439
  5. Snowden, 2011, Cookbook for Analysis Procedures for XMM-Newton EPIC MOS Observations of Extended Objects and the Diffuse Background, Version 4.3
  6. Voges, 1999, A&A, 349, 389
  7. Yuan, 1998, A&A, 330, 108

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 273

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Miller, M. J., & Bregman, J. N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
ORCID
Bregman, Joel N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Published
2015-02-04
Volume
800
Issue
1
Pages
14
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
DOI
10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/14
OpenAlex
W2002520353
Cited by
273
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX11AJ55G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
missing baryons, Local Bubble, quasar absorption lines, X-ray emission lines, optical depth effects, gas cooling, entropy gradients, pulsar dispersion measure, Large Magellanic Cloud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review