Cited by 80Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE HIGH-MASS STELLAR INITIAL MASS FUNCTION IN M31 CLUSTERS

Open access

Abstract

We have undertaken the largest systematic study of the high-mass stellar initial mass function (IMF) to date using the optical color–magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of 85 resolved, young ( ), intermediate mass star clusters (10 3 –10 4 M ⊙ ), observed as part of the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury program. We fit each cluster's CMD to measure its mass function (MF) slope for stars ≳2 M ⊙ . By modeling the ensemble of clusters, we find the distribution of MF slopes is best described by with a very small intrinsic scatter and no drastic outliers. This model allows the MF slope to depend on cluster mass, size, and age, but the data imply no significant dependencies within this regime of cluster properties. The lack of an age dependence suggests that the MF slope has not significantly evolved over the first ∼25 Myr and provides direct observational evidence that the measured MF represents the IMF. Taken together, this analysis—based on an unprecedented large sample of young clusters, homogeneously constructed CMDs, well-defined selection criteria, and consistent principled modeling—implies that the high-mass IMF slope in M31 clusters is universal. The IMF has a slope ( ; statistical uncertainties) that is slightly steeper than the canonical Kroupa ( ) and Salpeter ( ) values, and our measurement of it represents a factor of ∼20 improvement in precision over the Kroupa IMF (+1.30 ± 0.7). Using our inference model on select Milky Way (MW) and LMC high-mass IMF studies from the literature, we find and , both with intrinsic scatter of ∼0.3–0.4 dex. Thus, while the high-mass IMF in the Local Group may be universal, systematics in the literature of IMF studies preclude any definitive conclusions; homogenous investigations of the high-mass IMF in the local universe are needed to overcome this limitation. Consequently, the present study represents the most robust measurement of the high-mass IMF slope to date. To facilitate practical use over the full stellar mass spectrum, we have grafted the M31 high-mass IMF slope onto widely used sub-solar mass Kroupa and Chabrier IMFs. The increased steepness in the M31 high-mass IMF slope implies that commonly used UV- and H α -based star formation rates should be increased by a factor of ∼1.3–1.5 and the number of stars with masses M ⊙ is ∼25% fewer than expected for a Salpeter/Kroupa IMF.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/198

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies

    Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 3×

    “…Kennicutt 1998a; Elmegreen 1999; Kroupa 2001; Massey 2003; Alves et al. 2007; Fardal et al. 2007; McKee & Ostriker 2007; Wilkins et al. 2008; Pflamm-Altenburg & Kroupa 2009; Kennicutt & Evans 2012; Narayanan & Davé 2012; Conroy 2013; Belczynski et al. 2014; Krumholz 2014; Madau & Dickinson 2014).”
    BackgroundMethod

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. 10.1051/0004-6361:20066389 · DOI
  2. Andrews J. E., 2013, ApJ, 767, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/51 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10509-009-0133-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1146/annurev.aa.14.090176.000355 · DOI
  6. Baldry I. K., 2003, ApJ, 593, 258, 10.1086/376502 · DOI
  7. 10.1051/0004-6361/201218972 · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101642 · DOI
  9. Belczynski K., 2014, ApJ, 789, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/120 · DOI
  10. Boselli A., 2009, ApJ, 706, 1527, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1527 · DOI
  11. Calzetti D., 2010, ApJL, 719, L158, 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L158 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/376392 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 · DOI
  14. Conroy C., 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Conroy C., 2012, ApJ, 760, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/71 · DOI
  16. Conroy C., 2010, ApJ, 708, 58, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/58 · DOI
  17. da Silva R. L., 2012, ApJ, 745, 145, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/145 · DOI
  18. Dalcanton J. J., 2012, ApJS, 200, 18, 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/18 · DOI · Paper page
  19. de La Fuente Marcos R., 1997, A&A, 322, 764
  20. De Marchi G., 2010, ApJ, 718, 105, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/105 · DOI
  21. de Mink S. E., 2014, ApJ, 782, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/7 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/mnras/stu1521 · DOI
  23. 10.1086/316630 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05271.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Elmegreen B. G., 1999, ApJ, 515, 323, 10.1086/307011 · DOI
  26. Elmegreen B. G., 2006, ApJ, 636, 149, 10.1086/497889 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-8711.1998.t01-1-01948.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11522.x · DOI
  29. 10.1086/670067 · DOI
  30. Fumagalli M., 2011, ApJL, 741, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L26 · DOI
  31. 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150608 · DOI
  32. 10.1051/0004-6361:20020612 · DOI
  33. Girardi L., 2010, ApJ, 724, 1030, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1030 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Hogg D. W., 2010, ApJ, 725, 2166, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2166 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/mnras/stt713 · DOI
  36. Hoversten E. A., 2008, ApJ, 675, 163, 10.1086/524095 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1086/127082 · DOI
  39. Johnson L. C., 2012, ApJ, 752, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/95 · DOI
  40. 10.1086/161261 · DOI
  41. Kennicutt R. C.Jr. ed Gilmore G., 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 142, The Stellar Initial Mass Function (38th Herstmonceux Conf.), 1
  42. 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1086/174790 · DOI
  44. Kobulnicky H. A., 2014, ApJS, 213, 34, 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/34 · DOI
  45. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1126/science.1067524 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1051/0004-6361/200913325 · DOI
  48. Lee J. C., 2009, ApJ, 706, 599, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/599 · DOI
  49. Leitherer C. ed Gilmore G., 1998, in ASP Conf. Seri. 142, The Stellar Initial Mass Function, (38th Herstmonceux Conf.), 61
  50. Lequeux J., 1979, A&A, 80, 35
  51. 10.1086/146819 · DOI
  52. 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 · DOI
  53. Maíz Apellániz J., 2008, ApJ, 677, 1278, 10.1086/533525 · DOI
  54. Maíz Apellániz J., 2005, ApJ, 629, 873, 10.1086/431458 · DOI
  55. 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Massey P. ed Gilmore G., 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 142, The Stellar Initial Mass Function (38th Herstmonceux Conf.), 17
  57. 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.071601.170033 · DOI
  58. Massey P. ed Treyer M., 2011, in ASP Conf. Ser. 440, UP2010: Have Observations Revealed a Variable Upper End of the Initial Mass Function?, 29
  59. 10.1086/176474 · DOI
  60. 10.1086/175064 · DOI
  61. Mateo M. ed Smith G. H., 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 48, The Globular Cluster-Galaxy Connection, 387
  62. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 · DOI
  64. Meurer G. R., 2009, ApJ, 695, 765, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/765 · DOI
  65. 10.1086/190629 · DOI
  66. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21159.x · DOI
  67. 10.1093/mnras/stt1548 · DOI
  68. Oliphant T. E., 2007, CSE, 9, 10
  69. 10.1086/181440 · DOI
  70. Pérez F., 2007, CSE, 9, 21
  71. Pflamm-Altenburg J., 2009, ApJ, 706, 516, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/516 · DOI
  72. 10.1086/116772 · DOI
  73. 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834 · DOI
  74. 10.1086/145971 · DOI
  75. 10.1051/0004-6361/201219621 · DOI
  76. 10.1086/146318 · DOI
  77. Sanders N. E., 2012, ApJ, 758, 133, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/133 · DOI
  78. Scalo J. M., 1986, FCPh, 11, 1
  79. 10.1086/146614 · DOI
  80. 10.1086/151882 · DOI
  81. 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 · DOI
  82. 10.1086/131977 · DOI
  83. 10.1086/111673 · DOI
  84. 10.1086/152477 · DOI
  85. Tarrab I., 1982, A&A, 109, 285
  86. 10.1086/149455 · DOI
  87. 10.1051/0004-6361:20021044 · DOI
  88. 10.1086/146320 · DOI
  89. van den Bergh S., 1960, PDDO, 2, 203
  90. Venn K. A., 2000, ApJ, 541, 610, 10.1086/309491 · DOI
  91. Weidner C., 2005, ApJ, 625, 754, 10.1086/429867 · DOI
  92. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14258.x · DOI
  93. 10.1093/mnras/stu640 · DOI
  94. Weisz D. R., 2012, ApJ, 744, 44, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/44 · DOI
  95. Weisz D. R., 2013, ApJ, 762, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/123 · DOI
  96. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12885.x · DOI
  97. Williams B. F., 2014, ApJS, 215, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/9 · DOI
  98. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22075.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weisz, D. R., Johnson, L. C., Foreman-Mackey, D., Dolphin, A. E., Beerman, L. C., Williams, B. F., Dalcanton, J. J., Rix, H.-W., Hogg, D. W., Fouesneau, M., Johnson, B. D., Bell, E. F., Boyer, M. L., Gouliermis, D., Guhathakurta, P., Kalirai, J. S., Lewis, A. R., Seth, A. C., & Skillman, E. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • RTX (United States) (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
806
Issue
2
Pages
198
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2123849097
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (PHY11- 25915, 25915, 1053575, NAS 5-26555)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (ACI-1053575, PHY11-25915, NAS 526555, 526555)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, GO-12055, 26555)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara (PHY-11-25915)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
IMF slope, color-magnitude diagram, young stellar clusters, Local Group, star formation rate, Kroupa IMF, Salpeter IMF, Chabrier IMF

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review