Cited by 533Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Distances and metallicities for 17 Local Group galaxies

Open access
McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., Tanvir, N.·2005·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We have obtained Johnson V and Gunn i photometry for a large number of Local Group galaxies using the Isaac Newton Telescope Wide Field Camera (INT WFC). The majority of these galaxies are members of the M31 subgroup and the observations are deep enough to study the top few magnitudes of the red giant branch in each system. We previously measured the location of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) for Andromeda I, Andromeda II and M33 to within systematic uncertainties of typically <0.05 mag. As the TRGB acts as a standard candle in old, metal-poor stellar populations, we were able to derive distances to each of these galaxies. Here we derive TRGB distances to the giant spiral galaxy M31 and 13 additional dwarf galaxies – NGC 205, 185, 147, Pegasus, WLM, LGS3, Cetus, Aquarius, And III, V, VI, VII and the newly discovered dwarf spheroidal And IX. The observations for each of the dwarf galaxies were intentionally taken in photometric conditions. In addition to the distances, we also self-consistently derive the median metallicity of each system from the colour of their red giant branches. This allows us to take into account the small metallicity variation of the absolute I magnitude of the TRGB. The homogeneous nature of our data and the identical analysis applied to each of the 17 Local Group galaxies ensures that these estimates form a reliable set of distance and metallicity determinations that are ideal for comparative studies of Local Group galaxy properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [40]40. Irwin M. et al., 2004, in Quinn P. J., Bridger A., eds, Proc. SPIE Vol. 5493, Optimizing Scientific Return for Astronomy through Information Tech- nologies. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, p. 411
  2. [50]50. Lasker B. M., Postman M., 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 43, Sky Surveys. Protostars to Protogalaxies. Astron Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p. 131
  3. [70]70. Reid N., Djorgovski S., 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 43, Sky Surveys. Protostars to Protogalaxies. Astron Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p. 125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., & Tanvir, N.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg (FR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2005-01
Volume
356
Issue
3
Pages
979-997
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2153117529
Cited by
533
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 42
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
Local Group galaxies, tip of the red giant branch, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, M33, NGC 205, NGC 185, NGC 147, Pegasus, WLM, Cetus, Aquarius, standard candles, photometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review