Cited by 12Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsGNSS positioning and interferenceGeophysics and Sensor Technology

Combining GPS and VLBI for inter-continental frequency transfer

Open access
Hobiger, T, Rieck, C, Haas, R, Koyama, Y·2015·Metrologia

Abstract

For decades the global positioning system (GPS) has been the only space geodetic technique routinely used for inter-continental frequency transfer applications. In the past very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) has also been considered for this purpose and the method's capabilities were studied several times. However, compared to GPS current VLBI technology only provides few observations per hour, thus limiting its potential to improve frequency comparisons. We therefore investigate the effect of combining GPS and VLBI on the observation level in order to draw the maximum benefit from the strength of each individual technique. As a test-bed for our study we use the CONT11 campaign observed in 2011. First we review the frequency transfer performance that can be achieved with independent technique-specific analyses, both with individual software packages and with the multi-technique software c5++. With this analysis approach both techniques, GPS and VLBI, show similar frequency link instabilities at the level of 10 −14 to 10 −15 (MDEV) on inter-continental baselines for averaging times of one day. Then we use the c5++ software for a combined analysis of GPS and VLBI data on the observation level. We demonstrate that our combination approach leads to small but consistent improvements for frequency transfer of up to 10%, in particular for averaging periods longer than 3000 s.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0026-1394/52/2/251

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Gill P 2011 When should we change the definition of the second? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369 4109-30 · DOI
  2. Ray J and Senior K 2005 Geodetic techniques for time and frequency comparisons using GPS phase and code measurements Metrologia 42 215-32 · DOI
  3. Nakagawa F, Amagai J, Tabuchi R, Takahashi Y, Nakamura M, Tsuchiya S and Hama S 2013 Carrier-phase TWSTFT experiments using the ETS-VIII satellite Metrologia 50 200-7 · DOI
  4. Hess M P, Kehrer J, Kufner M, Durand S, Heijc G, Frühauf H, Cacciapuoti L, Much R and Nasca R 2011 The ACES MWL status and test results Proc. 2011 Joint IEEE Int. Frequency Control Symp. and European Frequency and Time Forum (San Francisco, CA, 2-5 May 2011 pp 26-33
  5. Samain E et al 2006 T2L2: time transfer by laser link Proc. of the 15th Workshop on Laser Ranging (Canberra, Australia, 15-20 October 2006)
  6. Rieck C, Haas R, Jaldehag K and Johansson J 2010 VLBI and GPS-based time-transfer using CONT08 data IVS 2010 General Meeting Proc., NASA/CP 2010-215864 (Tasmania, Australia, 7-13 February 2010) pp 365-9
  7. Clark T 1972 Precision timing and very long baseline interferometry Proc. of the 4th PTTI (Greenbelt, MD, 14-6 November 1972) 74-89
  8. Koyama Y 2012 The use of very long baseline interferometry for time and frequency metrology MAPAN 27 23-30 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Sovers O J, Fanselow J L and Jacobs C S 1998 Astrometry and geodesy with radio interferometry: experiments, models, results Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 1393-454 · DOI
  10. Petit G and Luzum B 2010 IERS Conventions (IERS Technical Note vol 36) p179
  11. Hobiger T and Otsubo T 2014 Combination of GPS and VLBI on the observation level during CONT11: common parameters, ties and inter-technique biases J. Geod. 88 1017-28 · DOI
  12. Ma C, Sauber J M, Bell L J, Clark T A, Gordon D, Himwich W E and Ryan J W 1990 Measurement of horizontal motions Alaska using very long baseline interferometry J. Geophys. Res. 95 21991-2011 · DOI
  13. Rieck Haas R, Jarlemark P and Jaldehag K 2012 VLBI frequency transfer using CONT11 Eur. Freq. Time Forum 163-5 · DOI
  14. Orgiazzi D, Tavella P and Lahaye F 2005 Experimental assessment of the time transfer capability of precise point positioning (PPP) Proc. of the Joint IEEE Int. FCS and the PTTI (Vancouver, BC, 29-31 August 2005) pp 337-45
  15. Behrend D et al 2012 Organization, Correlation and First Results of CONT11, IVS 2012 General Meeting Proc. (Madrid, Spain, 4-9 March 2012) pp 186-90
  16. Zumberge J F, Hefflin M B, Jefferson D C, Watkins M M and Webb F H 1997 Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks J. Geophys. Res. 102 5005-18 · DOI
  17. Kouba J and Heroux P 2001 Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products GPS Solutions 5 12-28 · DOI
  18. Dow J M, Neilan R E and Rizos C 2009 The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems J. Geod. 83 191-8 · DOI
  19. Koch K R 1997 Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models (Berlin: Springer)
  20. Martínez-Belda M C and Defraigne P 2010 Combination of TWSTFT and GPS data for time transfer Metrologia 47 305-16 · DOI
  21. Panek P, Kodet J and Prochazka I 2013 Accuracy of two-way time transfer via a single coaxial cable Metrologia 50 60-5 · DOI
  22. Petrachenko W T, Niell A E, Corey B E, Behrend D, Schuh H and Wresnik J 2012 VLBI2010: next generation VLBI system for geodesy and astrometry Geodesy for Planet Earth (Int. Association of Geodesy Symp. vol 136) ed S Kenyon et al (Berlin: Springer) pp 999-1006
  23. Schuh H and Behrend D 2012 VLBI: a fascinating technique for geodesy and astrometry J. Geodyn. 61 68-80 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X and Métivier L 2011 ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame J. Geod. 85 457-73 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Bizouard C and Gambis D 2009 The combined solution C04 for earth orientation parameters consistent with international terrestrial reference frame 2005 Geodetic Reference Frames (Int. Association of Geodesy Symp. vol 134) pp 265-70

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobiger, T., Rieck, C., Haas, R., & Koyama, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Hobiger, T
Venue
Metrologia
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 0026-1394 (ISSN-L)
  • 1681-7575
OpenAlex
W2013861541
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metrologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysics and Sensor Technology
Keywords
GPS, very long baseline interferometry, space geodesy, frequency comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review