The DOI matches its Crossref record.
X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues
Open accessAbstract
Normal and neoplastic breast tissues have been characterised in terms of x-ray attenuation. Samples of normal fat and fibrous tissue were obtained from reduction mammoplasty and autopsy, and infiltrating duct carcinoma specimens from mastectomy and lumpectomy. A high-purity germanium spectroscopy system and a beam of 120 kV constant potential x-rays were used to determine the linear attenuation coefficient from 18 to 110 keV. Densities were determined from buoyancy measurements and were used to obtain mass attenuation coefficients. Infiltrating duct carcinomas and fat are well distinguished by x-ray attenuation. For photon energies used for film-screen mammography, infiltrating duct carcinomas are more attenuating than fibrous tissue. Above 31 keV, the ranges of attenuation of the two tissue types overlap. The attenuation coefficients of tissues have been concisely represented by equivalent thicknesses of lucite and aluminium. Analysis based on the average attenuation properties of tissues indicates that dual-energy mammography, using an ideal imaging system, would require 0.06 cGy to provide images in which 1 cm infiltrating duct carcinomas are displayed with a signal to noise ratio of 5 against a background over which the fat/fibrous contrast has been suppressed. This dose is similar to that currently used in conventional film-screen mammography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer
Boyd, N. F., Rommens, J. M., Vogt, K., Lee, V., Hopper, J. L., Yaffe, M. J., & Paterson, A. D. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70390-9 · Cited by 613
Self-citationBreast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer
Boyd, N. F., Martin, L. J., Bronskill, M., Yaffe, M. J., Duric, N., & Minkin, S. (2010) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq239 · Cited by 478
Self-citationDedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation
Boone, J. M., Nelson, T. R., Lindfors, K. K., & Seibert, J. A. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2213010334 · Cited by 468
Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction
Vachon, C. M., van Gils, C. H., Sellers, T. A., Ghosh, K., Pruthi, S., Brandt, K. R., & Pankratz, V. S. (2007) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr1829 · Cited by 346
Cone‐beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study
Chen, B., & Ning, R. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1461843 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Johns, P. C., & Yaffe, M. J.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1987-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 675-695
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2032138177
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002
- The paper
- Johns, P. C., & Yaffe, M. J. (1987). X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.