Deep Learning in Medical Ultrasound Analysis: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Ultrasound (US) has become one of the most commonly performed imaging modalities in clinical practice. It is a rapidly evolving technology with certain advantages and with unique challenges that include low imaging quality and high variability. From the perspective of image analysis, it is essential to develop advanced automatic US image analysis methods to assist in US diagnosis and/or to make such assessment more objective and accurate. Deep learning has recently emerged as the leading machine learning tool in various research fields, and especially in general imaging analysis and computer vision. Deep learning also shows huge potential for various automatic US image analysis tasks. This review first briefly introduces several popular deep learning architectures, and then summarizes and thoroughly discusses their applications in various specific tasks in US image analysis, such as classification, detection, and segmentation. Finally, the open challenges and potential trends of the future application of deep learning in medical US image analysis are discussed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys deep learning architectures and their use in medical ultrasound image analysis, focusing on classification, detection, segmentation, and 3D ultrasound. It concludes that deep learning has strong potential but remains limited by small annotated datasets, transfer-learning challenges, and the difficulty of 3D deep learning.
Key findings
- The review covers supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid deep models—mainly CNNs, RNNs, RBMs/DBNs, and AEs—and summarizes their application to ultrasound classification, detection, segmentation, and 3D ultrasound analysis.
- Reported example results include breast tumor classification reaching 92.4% accuracy with DPN/S-DPN; focal liver lesion classification at 86.36% with a DBN and 90.41% with DCCA+MKL; thyroid nodule integrated features improving accuracy by 14%; and transferred CNNs for fetal anatomical structures achieving 91.5% vs. 87.9% for directly learned CNNs.
- Segmentation examples include fetal left ventricle dynamic CNN improving mean Dice from 88.35% to 94.5%, kidney segmentation improving approximately 5% with prior shape information, and aortic valve MSDL showing up to 42.5% improvement over the state of the art.
- The paper identifies transfer learning and domain-specific model design as key strategies for small medical ultrasound datasets, while noting that 3D ultrasound remains promising but computationally and methodologically challenging.
Methods
- Narrative review: literature search until 2018 Feb 1 using keywords (“ultrasound” OR “ultrasonography” OR “ultrasonic imaging” AND “convolutional” OR “deep learning”) in PubMed, Google Scholar, and conference proceedings including MICCAI, SPIE, ISBI, and EMBC.
- Abstracts were screened, resulting in nearly 100 relevant papers; the review organizes findings by deep learning architecture and by task (classification, detection, segmentation) across anatomical structures, with a separate section on 3D ultrasound.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: limited public medical ultrasound datasets and small training samples are a bottleneck; 3D deep learning is computationally expensive and prone to overfitting; transfer learning risks negative transfer and heterogeneous feature spaces.
- Stated in the paper: many current 3D ultrasound methods are actually slice-by-slice 2D approaches and cannot exploit anatomical context in orthogonal directions.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not perform a systematic quality assessment or quantitative meta-analysis; the reported performance numbers are illustrative examples from cited studies rather than independently validated pooled results.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 74 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
A study on prenatal detection of malformations using US images demonstrated that sensitivity ranged from 27.5% to 96% among different medical institutes.
“For example, a study on the prenatal detection of malformations using US images demonstrated that the sensitivity ranged from 27.5% to 96% among different medical institutes [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Medical US has high inter- and intra-observer variability across different institutes and manufacturers' US systems.
“However, US also presents unique challenges, such as low imaging quality caused by noise and artifacts, high dependence on abundant operator or diagnostician experience, and high inter-and intra-observer variability across different institutes and manufacturers' US systems.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · boosted
“For example, a study on the prenatal detection of malformations using US images demonstrated that the sensitivity ranged from 27.5% to 96% among different medical institutes [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · boosted
- Premisecitation
Few review articles focus on medical US analysis, aside from one or two papers examining specific tasks such as breast US image segmentation.
“However, few focus on medical US analysis, aside from one or two papers that examine specific tasks such as breast US image segmentation [55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several review articles on deep learning in medical image analysis focus on the whole field of medical image analysis or on other single-imaging modalities such as MRI and microscopy.
“Several review articles have been written to date on the application of deep learning to medical image analysis; these articles focus on either the whole field of medical image analysis [11][12][13][14][15] or other single-imaging modalities such as MRI [53] and microscopy [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Antropova et al.'s method fusing pre-trained CNN features with hand-designed features using conventional CADx methods on three clinical imaging modality datasets demonstrated significant performance improvement.
“In the work of Antropova et al. [91], a method that fuses the extracted and pooled low-and mid-level features using a pre-trained CNN with hand-designed features using conventional CADx methods was applied to three clinical imaging modality datasets, and demonstrated significant performance improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Traditional machine learning approaches for breast tumor or mass lesion CADx often utilize handcrafted and heuristic lesion-extracted features.
“Traditional machine learning approaches for breast tumor or mass lesion CADx often utilize handcrafted and heuristic lesion-extracted features [85].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Transfer learning avoids expensive data-labeling efforts in the application of a specific domain.
“This method avoids expensive data-labeling efforts in the application of a specific domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Current applications of deep learning techniques in US analysis mainly involve classification, detection, and segmentation for various anatomical structures or tissues.
“As noted earlier, current applications of deep learning techniques in US analysis mainly involve three types of tasks: classification, detection, and segmentation for various anatomical structures or tissues, such as the breast, prostate, liver, heart, and fetus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Unsupervised learning has a significant advantage over supervised learning: it does not require time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive human annotations.
“Unsupervised learning has one significant advantage over supervised learning, which is that it does not require the utilization of time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive human annotations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
One of the most common problems when using limited training samples is that it is easy to over-fit the deep model.
“One of the most common problems when using limited training samples is that it is easy to over-fit the deep model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Transfer learning strategy is frequently adopted for liver cancer US diagnosis.
“In addition, the transfer learning strategy is frequently adopted for liver cancer US diagnosis [58,94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
An inappropriate transfer learning method may sometimes decrease performance, resulting in negative transfer.
“However, an inappropriate transfer learning method may sometimes decrease the performance instead, resulting in negative transfer [157].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The supervised descent method regression applied to hand-designed features is more flexible in iteratively refining the estimated left ventricle contour.
“A plausible explanation is that the supervised descent method (SDM) [138] regression method applied to hand-designed features is more flexible in iteratively refining the estimated LV contour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Deep learning algorithms obtained an overall detection performance improvement on two breast US image datasets.
“Experiments on two breast US image datasets indicated that an overall detection performance improvement was obtained by the deep learning algorithms; however, no single deep model could achieve the best performance in terms of true positive fraction (TPF), false positive per image (FPs/image), and F-measure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Azizi et al. successfully accomplished detection and grading of prostate cancer through a combination of high-level abstract features extracted from temporal-enhanced US by a DBN and tissue structure from digital pathology.
“Recently, Azizi et al. [20,106,107] successfully accomplished the detection and grading of prostate cancer through a combination of high-level abstract features extracted from temporal-enhanced US by a DBN and the structure of tissue from digital pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
No single deep model could achieve the best performance in terms of true positive fraction, false positives per image, and F-measure for breast lesion detection.
“Experiments on two breast US image datasets indicated that an overall detection performance improvement was obtained by the deep learning algorithms; however, no single deep model could achieve the best performance in terms of true positive fraction (TPF), false positive per image (FPs/image), and F-measure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A 3D network may dramatically increase the risk of overfitting given limited training data.
“This may dramatically increase the risk of overfitting, given the limited training data [144].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A specially designed small network may be more suitable to the smaller-scale training datasets commonly encountered in medical imaging.
“Instead, a specially designed small network may be more suitable to the smaller-scale training datasets that are commonly encountered in medical imaging [155].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When using small training samples, de novo training of domain-specific deep models, if the model size is selected properly, can achieve superior performance compared with transfer learning from a network pre-trained on large samples in another domain.
“When using small training samples, the de novo training of domain-specific deep models (if the size of the model is selected properly) can achieve a superior performance when compared with transfer learning from a network that has been pre-trained using large training samples in another domain (e.g., natural images) [154].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [154]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A very deep CNN with a global average pooling strategy achieved significant performance improvement on limited training data in fetal standard plane recognition.
“In a specific fetal standard plane recognition task, a very deep CNN with a global average pooling (GAP) strategy achieved significant performance improvement on the limited training data [104,105].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [104]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The dynamic CNN obtained a performance improvement from 88.35% to 94.5% in mean Dice coefficient compared with the fixed CNN for fetal left ventricle segmentation.
“The experiments showed that the dynamic CNN obtained a remarkable performance improvement from 88.35% to 94.5% in terms of the mean of the Dice coefficient, when compared with the fixed CNN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Formulating segmentation as a patch-level classification task can significantly reduce extensive computation cost and memory requirement.
“This method can significantly reduce the extensive computation cost and memory requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Successful placental segmentation from 3D US volumes seemed to demonstrate that DeepMedic is a generic 3D deep architecture suitable for different modalities of 3D medical data.
“However, the successful placental segmentation from the 3D US volumes seemed to demonstrate that DeepMedic is a generic 3D deep architecture that is suitable for different modalities of 3D medical data (volumes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [150]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [151] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Segmentation results for anatomical structures using deep learning demonstrated performance comparable with that of human radiologists.
“All of these results demonstrated a segmentation performance that was comparable with that of human radiologists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21,38,44,46,50,57,[124][125][126]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Transferred CNNs outperformed CNNs directly learned from small US data (91.5% vs. 87.9%) for multi-label classification of fetal anatomical structures.
“The results demonstrated that transferred CNNs outperformed those that were directly learned from small US data (91.5% vs. 87.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A transferred RNN-based deep model has been employed for automatic detection of multiple fetal US standard planes in US videos.
“To incorporate the spatiotemporal information, a transferred RNNbased deep model has also been employed for the automatic detection of multiple fetal US standard planes (e.g., abdominal, face axial, and four-chamber view) in US videos [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Baumgartner et al. and Chen et al. accomplished detection of 13 fetal standard views and the fetal abdominal, face, or four-chamber standard plane in 2D US images through transferred deep models.
“Baumgartner et al. [117,118] and Chen et al. [78,119] accomplished the detection of 13 fetal standard views (e.g., kidneys, brain, abdominal, spine, femur, and cardiac plane) and the fetal abdominal (or face and four-chamber view) standard plane in 2D US images through the transferred deep models, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Limited training data act as a bottleneck for further application of deep learning methods in medical US image analysis.
“The limited training data act as a bottleneck for the further application of deep learning methods in medical US image analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Current public availability of datasets in the field of medical US is still limited.
- Rests on an assumption: Major performance improvement achievable with deep learning greatly depends on large training sample datasets.
- Premisecitation
A recent study showed that handcrafted features outperformed CNN on left ventricle segmentation in 2D echocardiographic images at a markedly lower computational cost in training.
“Although most studies have demonstrated that the use of deep learning can yield a much superior performance when compared with conventional machine learning methods, a recent study [137] showed that handcrafted features outperformed the CNN on LV segmentation in 2D echocardiographic images at a markedly lower computational cost in training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reinforcement learning has been combined with deep learning for anatomical cardiac US landmark detection.
“Note that reinforcement learning has also been combined with deep learning for anatomical (cardiac US) landmark detection [123].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Few experiments have demonstrated that cross-modal transfer learning may be superior to cross-domain transfer learning for a specific task in the absence of sufficient training datasets.
“Few experiments have demonstrated that cross-modal transfer learning may be superior to a cross-domain one for a specific task in the absence of sufficient training datasets [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Conventional machine learning methods such as active contours and deformable templates have been widely used to successfully segment the left ventricle under the condition of using prior knowledge about left ventricle shape and appearance.
“To address these issues, various conventional machine learning methods such as active contours [127] and deformable templates [128] have been widely used to successfully segment the LV, under the condition of using prior knowledge about the LV shape and appearance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [127]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [128] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Incorporation of prior shape information led to an improvement of approximately 5% in kidney segmentation.
“The results on a kidney US image dataset demonstrated that incorporation of the prior shape information led to an improvement of approximately 5% in the kidney segmentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39]
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
- May combine two claims. 33
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningUS-based diagnostic techniques have become one of the most important noninvasive methods for the detection, diagnosis, intervention, and treatment of liver cancer.
“Therefore, US-based diagnostic techniques have become one of the most important noninvasive methods for the detection, diagnosis, intervention, and treatment of liver cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiu et al. and Shi et al. employed deep polynomial network or stacked DPN on two small US datasets and obtained highest classification accuracies of 92.4%, outperforming unsupervised deep learning algorithms such as stacked AE and DBN.
“Both Liu et al. [87] and Shi et al. [19] employed a supervised deep learning algorithm called a deep polynomial network (DPN), or its stacked version, namely stacked DPN (S-DPN), on two small US datasets.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1. Tumors or lesions · plain
“the highest classification accuracies of 92.4% is obtained, outperforming the unsupervised deep learning algorithms, such as stacked AE and DBN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [87]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1. Tumors or lesions · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given3D US presents a promising trend in improving US imaging diagnosis in clinical practice.
“Furthermore, 3D US presents a promising trend in improving US imaging diagnosis in clinical practice, which is discussed in detail as a separate sub-section.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDeep learning can directly learn features from images in an automatic manner.
“In contrast, deep learning can directly learn features from images in an automatic manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBiopsy is still the current golden standard for liver cancer diagnosis and is heavily relied upon by conventional CADx methods.
“Biopsy is still the current golden standard for liver cancer diagnosis, and is heavily relied upon by conventional CADx methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDeep learning architectures used in most current works in medical US analysis can be categorized into three major classes: supervised deep networks, unsupervised deep networks, and hybrid deep networks.
“Based on the deep learning architectures and techniques in question, such as classification, segmentation, or detection, the deep learning architectures that are used in most of the current works in this field can be categorized into three major classes: ① supervised deep networks or deep discriminative models, ② unsupervised deep networks or deep generative models, and ③ hybrid deep networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA 2D US image presents a thin plane at arbitrary angles in the body, and these planes are difficult to localize and reproduce later for follow-up studies.
“A 2D US image presents a thin plane at various arbitrary angles in the body.These planes are difficult to localize and reproduce later for follow-up studies [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBiopsy is invasive and uncomfortable and can easily cause other adverse effects.
“However, biopsy is invasive and uncomfortable, and can easily cause other adverse effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe basic models or architectures applied in current medical US analysis are mainly CNNs, RNNs, RBMs/DBNs, AEs, and variants of these architectures.
“The basic models or architectures applied in current medical US analysis are mainly CNNs, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), RBMs/DBNs (where DBN refers to deep belief networks), AEs, and variants of these deep learning architectures, as shown in Fig. 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep learning is a state-of-the-art tool for automatic analysis tasks, and its use can lead to marked improvement in performance.
“thus demonstrating that deep learning is a state-of-the-art tool for the performance of automatic analysis tasks, and that its use can lead to marked improvement in performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSDAE, PGBM combined with RBM, and GoogLeNet CNN applied to breast US or shear-wave elastography images for breast cancer diagnosis obtained superior performance compared with human experts.
“In addition, the stacked denoising auto-encoder (SDAE) [88], a combination of the point-wise gated Boltzmann machine (PGBM) and RBM [89], and the GoogLeNet CNN [90] have been applied to breast US or shear-wave elastography images for breast cancer diagnosis; all of these obtained a superior performance when compared with human experts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTwo main strategies for transferring knowledge from other domains to medical US are using a pre-trained network as a feature extractor and fine-tuning a pre-trained network on medical US images or video sequences.
“This process involves two main strategies: ① using a pre-trained network as a feature extractor (i.e., to learn features from scratch); and ② fine-tuning a pre-trained network on medical US images or video sequences-a method that is widely applied at present in US analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDiagnostic and therapeutic decisions often require accurate estimation of organ or tumor volume, but 2D US calculates volume from simple measurements assuming an idealized shape, which may lead to low accuracy, high variability, and operator dependency.
“Diagnostic (e.g., OB-GYN) and therapeutic (e.g., staging and planning) decisions often require accurate estimation of organ or tumor volume; however, 2D US techniques calculate volume from simple measurements of length, width, and height in two orthogonal views by assuming an idealized (e.g., ellipsoidal) shape.This may lead to low accuracy, high variability, and operator dependency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCurrent medical US analysis still focuses on 2D US image processing, but there is a growing trend in applications of deep learning in 3D medical US analysis.
“Although current medical US analysis still focuses on twodimensional (2D) US image processing, there is a growing trend in applications of deep learning in three-dimensional (3D) medical US analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTransfer learning has been widely adopted and exhibits excellent capacity for improving learning performance without the need for large samples.
“Another key solution is transfer learning, which has also been widely adopted and which exhibits excellent capacity for improving the performance of learning without the need for large samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent applications of deep learning in medical US analysis have involved classification, segmentation, detection, registration, biometric measurements, quality assessment, image-guided interventions, and therapy.
“Recent applications of deep learning in medical US analysis have involved various tasks, such as traditional diagnosis tasks including classification, segmentation, detection, registration, biometric measurements, and quality assessment, as well as emerging tasks including image-guided interventions and therapy [16] (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUntil recently, RNNs have not been widely utilized in sequence models because it is difficult to train them to capture long-term dependencies, giving rise to gradient explosion or vanishing problems.
“However, until recently, RNNs have not been widely utilized in the various study tasks that are referred to as sequence models.This is partly because it is difficult to train the RNN itself to capture long-term dependencies, in which the RNN usually gives rise to gradient explosion or gradient vanishing problems that were discovered in the early 1990s [61].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCNN is one of the most popular deep architectures and has gained great success in image classification, object detection, and target segmentation.
“CNN is known as one of the most popular deep architectures and has also gained great success in various tasks, such as image classification [48,49], object detection [29,30], and target segmentation [44,50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth pre-trained feature extraction and fine-tuning strategies achieve excellent performance in several specific tasks.
“Both strategies achieve excellent performance in several specific tasks [77,78].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe current application of deep learning in medical US analysis is a growing trend supported by progress in the field.
“Furthermore, the current application of deep learning in medical US analysis is a growing trend that is supported by progress in this field [23,52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSupervised deep models are widely used for classification, segmentation, and detection of anatomical structures in medical US images, with CNNs and RNNs being the two most popular architectures.
“At present, supervised deep models are widely used for the classification, segmentation, and detection of anatomical structures in medical US images; for these tasks, CNNs and RNNs are the two most popular architectures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRNNs are mainly applied in speech or text-recognition domains and are rarely used in medical image analysis, much less medical US analysis.
“Thus far, RNNs are mainly applied in speech or text-recognition domains, and are rarely used in medical image analysis, much less medical US analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningRNNs have an inherent advantage for modeling sequence data such as medical US video sequences.
“The RNN has an inherent advantage for modeling sequence data (e.g., medical US video sequences) due to the structural characteristics of the network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTraditional machine learning methods for classification often used handcrafted features with a multi-way linear classifier, but these methods are susceptible to image distortion.
“Traditional machine learning methods often utilized various handcrafted features extracted from US images in combination with a multi-way linear classifier (e.g., SVM) in order to achieve a specific classification task.However, these methods are susceptible to image distortion, such as deformation due to the internal or external environments, or to conditions in the imaging process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe requirement of large labeled training samples is difficult to meet in current medical US analysis, where expert annotation is expensive and some diseases are scarce in datasets.
“However, this requirement is difficult to meet in current medical US analysis, where expert annotation is expensive and where some diseases (e.g., lesions or nodules) are scarce in the datasets [68].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFollowing Jamieson et al.'s success, many similar studies applied deep learning methods to breast tumor diagnosis.
“Following this success, many similar studies applied deep learning methods to breast tumor diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationJamieson et al. (2012) used adaptive deconvolutional networks to learn image features from breast tumor US images, and the performance reached the level of conventional CADx schemes that employ human-designed features.
“As early as 2012, Jamieson et al. [86] performed a preliminary study that referred to the use of deep learning in the task of classifying breast tumors or mass lesions.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1. Tumors or lesions · plain
“The results showed that the performance reached the level of conventional CADx schemes that employ human-designed features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86]
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1. Tumors or lesions · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWu et al. applied a three-layer DBN to time-intensity curves from contrast-enhanced US video sequences to classify malignant and benign focal liver lesions and achieved highest accuracy of 86.36%, outperforming LDA, k-NN, SVM, and BPN.
“Wu et al. [22] applied a three-layer DBN in timeintensity curves (TICs) extracted from contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) video sequences in order to classify malignant and benign focal liver lesions.They achieved a highest accuracy of 86.36%, thus outperforming conventional machine methods such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), SVM, and back propagation net (BPN).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTo overcome the limitations of 2D US, a variety of 3D US scanning, reconstruction, and display techniques have been developed, providing a broad foundation for 3D medical US analysis.
“To overcome the limitations of 2D US, a variety of 3D US scanning, reconstruction, and display techniques have been developed, which provide a broad foundation for 3D medical US analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTo screen the papers from the search, the abstract of every paper was read in detail, and relevant papers were chosen, resulting in nearly 100 relevant papers.
“To screen the papers resulting from this search, the abstract of every paper was read in detail; papers that were relevant for this review were then chosen, which finally resulted in nearly 100 relevant papers, as summarized in Fig. 2 and Table S1 in Appendix A.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe great success of deep learning comes from the fact that a large number of labeled training samples are required to achieve excellent learning performance.
“The great success of deep learning comes from the fact that a large number of labeled training samples are required in order to achieve excellent learning performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRNNs are generally considered a type of supervised deep network used for a variety of tasks in medical US analysis.
“In practical terms, an RNN is generally considered to be a type of supervised deep network that is used for a variety of tasks in medical US analysis [21,60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDeep neural networks have advantages due to their direct learning of mid- and high-level abstract features from raw data, and can directly output an individual prediction label for each image.
“Here, deep neural networks (DNNs) have several obvious advantages due to their direct learning of mid-and high-level abstract features from the raw data (or images).In addition, DNNs can be directly used to output an individual prediction label for each image, in order to classify targets of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause US images are 2D while anatomical structure is 3D, the examiner must integrate multiple images mentally, and lack of this ability leads to variability and incorrect diagnosis or misdiagnosis.
“Although US images are 2D, the anatomical structure is 3D; thus, the examiner/diagnostician must possess the ability to integrate multiple images in his or her mind (in an often inefficient and time-consuming process).Lack of this ability will lead to variability and incorrect diagnosis or misdiagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning has entered various application areas of medical US analysis.
“From the examples provided above, it is evident that deep learning has entered various application areas of medical US analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWu et al. implanted the FCN core into an auto-context scheme to bridge severe boundary incompleteness and remarkably improve segmentation accuracy.
“In addition, Wu et al. [141] implanted the FCN core into an auto-context scheme [142] in order to take advantage of local contextual information, and thus bridge severe boundary incompleteness and remarkably improve the segmentation accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [141]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [142] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough deep learning methods have constantly updated state-of-the-art performance results across different application aspects in medical US analysis, there is still room for improvement.
“However, although deep learning methods have constantly updated state-of-the-art performance results across different application aspects in medical US analysis, there is still room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAcquisition of the standard plane is a prerequisite step and is crucial for subsequent biometric measurements and diagnosis in fetal US diagnosis.
“Among the workflow of fetal US diagnosis, acquisition of the standard plane is the prerequisite step and is crucial for subsequent biometric measurements and diagnosis [114].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing only the CPU, the aortic valve can be successfully segmented in less than one second with higher accuracy than the original MSL.
“By only using the central processing unit (CPU), the aortic valve can be successfully segmented in less than one second with higher accuracy than the original MSL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping domain-specific deep learning models for medical imaging can improve task-specific performance with low computation complexity and facilitate technological advantages in CADx in the medical imaging domain.
“Consequently, developing domain-specific deep learning models for medical imaging can not only improve task-specific performance with a low computation complexity, but also facilitate technological advantages in CADx in the medical imaging domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMSDL demonstrated efficiency and robustness in 3D detection and segmentation of the aortic valve, with significant improvement up to 42.5% over the state of the art.
“The results on a large 3D transesophageal echocardiogram image dataset demonstrated the efficiency and robustness of the MSDL in the 3D detection and segmentation task of the aortic valve; it showed a significant improvement of up to 42.5% over the state of the art.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe combination of sparse manifold learning and DBN in the rigid detection stage yielded performance as accurate as the state of the art but with lower training and search complexity.
“Their experiments demonstrated that the combination of sparse manifold learning and DBN in the rigid detection stage yielded a performance as accurate as the state of the art, but with lower training and search complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [124]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncorrect fetal abdominal circumference measurement may lead to inaccurate fetal weight estimation and further increase the risk of misdiagnosis.
“In clinical examination and diagnosis, incorrect fetal AC measurement may lead to inaccurate fetal weight estimation and further increase the risk of misdiagnosis [98].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNascimento and Carneiro directly performed non-rigid segmentation through sparse low-dimensional manifold mapping of explicit contours, but with limited generalization capability.
“Unlike the typical non-rigid segmentation scheme, Nascimento and Carneiro [136] directly performed non-rigid segmentation through the sparse lowdimensional manifold mapping of explicit contours, but with a limited generalization capability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136]
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Medical US imaging has low imaging quality caused by noise and artifacts.
“However, US also presents unique challenges, such as low imaging quality caused by noise and artifacts, high dependence on abundant operator or diagnostician experience, and high inter-and intra-observer variability across different institutes and manufacturers' US systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Medical US diagnosis has high dependence on abundant operator or diagnostician experience.
“However, US also presents unique challenges, such as low imaging quality caused by noise and artifacts, high dependence on abundant operator or diagnostician experience, and high inter-and intra-observer variability across different institutes and manufacturers' US systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Manual segmentation methods are time consuming and tedious, and suffer from great individual variability.
“Furthermore, it is well known that manual segmentation methods are time consuming and tedious, and suffer from great individual variability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Accurate segmentation of most anatomical structures, particularly lesions in US images, is still challenging due to low contrast between the target and background.
“Accurate segmentation of most anatomical structures, and particularly of lesions (nodules) in US images, is still a challenging task due to low contrast between the target and background in US images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fully automatic left ventricle segmentation is challenging due to significant appearance and shape variations, low signal-to-noise ratio, shadows, and edge dropout.
“However, fully automatic LV segmentation is a challenging task due to significant appearance and shape variations, a low signalto-noise ratio, shadows, and edge dropout.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fetal left ventricle segmentation is more challenging than adult left ventricle segmentation due to inhomogeneities, artifacts, poor contrast, large intersubject variations, and connected left ventricle and left atrium.
“Compared with adult LV segmentation, fetal LV segmentation is more challenging, since fetal echocardiographic sequences suffer from inhomogeneities, artifacts, poor contrast, and large intersubject variations; furthermore, there is usually a connected LV and left atrium (LA) due to the random movements of the fetus in the womb.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Boundary incompleteness is a common problem for many anatomical structures in medical US images and presents great challenges to automatic segmentation.
“Boundary incompleteness is a common problem for many anatomical structures (e.g., prostate, breast, kidney, fetus, etc.) in medical US images, and presents great challenges to the automatic segmentation of these structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
US image analysis fields often struggle with limited training samples due to difficulty in generating and sharing lesion or disease images.
“In contrast, US image analysis fields often struggle with limited training samples (usually in the hundreds or thousands, even after using data-augmentation strategies) due to the difficulty in generating and sharing lesion or disease images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cross-domain transfer learning is the most common way to accomplish a variety of tasks in medical US analysis.
“Cross-domain transfer learning is the most common way to accomplish a variety of tasks in medical US analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pre-training of models is currently always performed on large sample datasets.
“In any case, the pre-training of models is currently always performed on large sample datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Models trained on natural images may not be optimal for medical images, which are typically single channel, low contrast, and texture rich.
“In addition, models trained on natural images may not be optimal for medical images, which are typically single channel, low contrast, and texture rich.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Either US or mammography is usually regarded as the first-line screening examination, for which it is much easier to collect large training samples.
“Either US or mammography (i.e., X-ray) is usually regarded as the first-line screening examination, for which it is much easier to collect large training samples.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Breast MRI is more costly and time-consuming, commonly used for screening high-risk populations, and it is much more difficult to collect sufficient training datasets and ground-truth annotation for this method.
“However, breast MRI is a more costly and timeconsuming method that is commonly used for screening highrisk populations, and it is much more difficult to collect sufficient training datasets and ground-truth annotation for this method.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current public availability of datasets in the field of medical US is still limited.
“However, compared with the large and publicly available datasets in other areas (e.g., more than 1 million annotated multi-label natural images in ImageNet [6]), the current public availability of datasets in the field of medical US is still limited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Major performance improvement achievable with deep learning greatly depends on large training sample datasets.
“Clearly, the major performance improvement that can be achieved with deep learning greatly depends on large training sample datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effectiveness of any transfer method for a given target task mainly depends on two aspects: the source task and how it is related to the target.
“Ignoring the inherent differences between different methods, the effectiveness of any transfer method for a given target task mainly depends on two aspects: the source task, and how it is related to the target.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Producing positive transfer between sufficiently related tasks while avoiding negative transfer is difficult to achieve simultaneously in practice.
“However, these goals are difficult to achieve simultaneously in practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mapping is necessary to translate between task representations when the representations of the source and target tasks are heterogeneous.
“In addition, mapping is necessary in order to translate between task representations when the representations of the source and target tasks are heterogeneous.”
The paper relies on this without support.
3D US is a very important imaging modality in medical imaging, and 3D US image analysis has shown great potential in US-based clinical application.
“It is worth stressing again that 3D US is a very important imaging modality in the field of medical imaging, and that 3D US image analysis has shown great potential in US-based clinical application, although several issues remain to be addressed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is currently difficult to proceed with the development of 3D deep learning methods without the strong support of other communities, especially the computer vision community.
“However, it is currently difficult to proceed with the development of 3D deep learning methods without the strong support of other communities, and especially that of the CV community.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since Hinton proposed the deep belief networks (DBN) in 2006, deep network-based methods have accomplished significant achievements in various sectors.
“However, since Hinton proposed the deep belief networks (DBN) in 2006 [90], the deep network-based method has accomplished significant achievements in various sectors [91,92,93,94].”
From Semantic Terrain Segmentation in the Navigation Vision of Planetary Rovers—A Systematic Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Deep learning is increasingly used in medical imaging for tasks such as automated lesion detection, segmentation and registration to assist clinicians in disease diagnosis and surgical planning.
“In medical imaging, deep learning is increasingly used for tasks such as automated lesion detection, segmentation and registration to assist clinicians in disease diagnosis and surgical planning.”
From Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Deep learning techniques have the potential to create new screening tools, predict diseases, improve diagnostic accuracy and accelerate clinical tasks, whilst also reducing costs and human error.
“Deep learning techniques have the potential to create new screening tools, predict diseases, improve diagnostic accuracy and accelerate clinical tasks, whilst also reducing costs and human error [9–17].”
From Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Accurate segmentation of most anatomical structures in medical ultrasound is challenging due to low contrast between the target and background of the images.
“However, accurate segmentation of most anatomical structures in medical ultrasound is still challenging due to the low contrast between the target and background of the images [8].”
From Model-Agnostic Method for Thoracic Wall Segmentation in Fetal Ultrasound Videos (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Caffe citation points to a fetal-ultrasound paper
MinorThe framework list cites reference 79 for Caffe, but reference 79 is about fetal ultrasound plane localization. The Caffe paper is listed as reference 80.
“(1) Caffe [79]: https://github.com/BVLC/caffe;”
“79. Chen H, Ni D, Qin J, Li S, Yang X, Wang T, et al. Standard plane localization in fetal ultrasound via domain transferred deep neural networks.”
Jamieson citation identifies different authors and year
MinorThe text cites [86] for a 2012 study by Jamieson et al., but reference 86 is a 2008 paper by Giger et al. The Jamieson study appears as reference 87.
“As early as 2012, Jamieson et al. [86] performed a preliminary study that referred to the use of deep learning in the task of classifying breast tumors or mass lesions.”
“86. Giger ML, Chan HP, Boone J. Anniversary paper: history and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys 2008;35(12):5799-820.”
Fetal-plane citation points to a stroke study
MinorReference 115 is cited for traditional methods of detecting a fetal ultrasound standard plane, but its listed title concerns pathology following stroke in rats.
“In addition to the use of traditional machine learning methods for the detection of the fetal US standard plane [115,116]”
“115. Lipsanen A, Parkkinen S, Khabbal J, Mäkinen P, Peräniemi S, Hiltunen M, et al. KB-R7943, an inhibitor of the reverse Na + /Ca 2+ exchanger, does not modify secondary pathology in the thalamus following focal cerebral stroke in rats.”
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 31,590 · see citing works
Fast R-CNNPreprint
Girshick, R. B. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.08083 · Cited by 29,416 · see citing works
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · see citing works
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545 · see citing works
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387 · see citing works
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
Ferlay, J., Shin, H.-R., Bray, F., Forman, D., Mathers, C., & Parkin, D. M. (2010) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.25516 · Cited by 22,207 · see citing works
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928 · see citing works
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · see citing works
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate ShiftPreprint
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 15,273 · see citing works
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995 · see citing works
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001 · see citing works
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · see citing works
Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279181 · Cited by 8,542 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
(2011) · Cited by 6,993 · see citing works
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382 · see citing works
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759 · see citing works
Deep learning in medical image analysis
Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H.-I. (2017) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442 · Cited by 4,968 · see citing works
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature EmbeddingPreprint
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.5093 · Cited by 4,748 · see citing works
(2010) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953039 · Cited by 4,051 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 3,740 · see citing works
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DeepMedic is a pathway 3D CNN architecture, proposed by Kamnitsas et al. [151], which was originally used to segment lesions in brain MRI.”
MethodLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?
Tajbakhsh, N., Shin, J. Y., Gurudu, S. R., Hurst, R. T., Kendall, C. B., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2535302 · Cited by 3,277 · see citing works
A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Hinton, G. E. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_32 · Cited by 2,852 · see citing works
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015
Navab, N., Joachim Hornegger, A., Wells, W. M., & Frangi, A. F. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 · Cited by 2,288 · see citing works
Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition
(2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., Lin, M., Wang, N., Wang, M., Xiao, T., Xu, B., Zhang, C., & Zhang, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.01274 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
Greenspan, H. K., van Ginneken, B., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2553401 · Cited by 1,704 · see citing works
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
Yang, G., Hawkes, D. J., Rueckert, D., Noble, J. A., & Taylor, C. (2009) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
Convolutional neural networks at constrained time cost
He, K., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299173 · Cited by 1,558 · see citing works
Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis
Ker, J., Wang, L., Rao, J. P., & Lim, C. C. T. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2788044 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Torch7: A Matlab-like Environment for Machine Learning
Collobert, R., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Farabet, C. (2011) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 1,241 · see citing works
Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092 · Cited by 1,157 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support
(2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions
Akkus, Z., Galimzianova, A., Hoogi, A., Rubin, D. L., & Erickson, B. J. (2017) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Overview of deep learning in medical imaging
Suzuki, K. (2017) · Radiological Physics and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks
Yap, M. H., Pons, G., Martí, J., Ganau, S., Sentís, M., Zwiggelaar, R., Davison, A. K., & Martí, R. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2731873 · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
Theano: new features and speed improvements
Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., Warde-Farley, D., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5590 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
An Analysis of Deep Neural Network Models for Practical Applications
Canziani, A., Paszke, A., & Culurciello, E. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07678 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging
Fenster, A., Downey, D. B., & Cardinal, H. N. (2001) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/201 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Recent advances in deep learning for speech research at Microsoft
Deng, L., Li, J., Huang, J.-T., Yao, K., Yu, D., Seide, F., Seltzer, M., Zweig, G., He, X., Williams, J., et al. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639345 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., Chou, Y.-H., Qin, J., Tiu, C.-M., Chang, Y.-C., Huang, C.-S., Shen, D., & Chen, C.-M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24454 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Auto-Context and Its Application to High-Level Vision Tasks and 3D Brain Image Segmentation
Tu, Z., & Bai, X. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.186 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Zheng, Y., Barbu, A., Georgescu, B., Scheuering, M., & Comaniciu, D. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.2004421 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Deep learning in microscopy image analysis: a survey
Xing, F., Xie, Y., Su, H., Liu, F., & Yang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2766168 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Wang, G. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2624938 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Learning Deep Generative Models
Salakhutdinov, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020120 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
SonoNet: Real-Time Detection and Localisation of Fetal Standard Scan Planes in Freehand Ultrasound
Baumgartner, C. F., Kamnitsas, K., Matthew, J., Fletcher, T. P., Smith, S., Koch, L. M., Kainz, B., & Rueckert, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2712367 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Thyroid nodule classification in ultrasound images by fine-tuning deep convolutional neural network
Chi, J., Walia, E., Babyn, P., Wang, J., Groot, G., & Eramian, M. (2017) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9997-y · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Hough-CNN: Deep learning for segmentation of deep brain regions in MRI and ultrasound
Milletarì, F., Ahmadi, S., Kroll, C., Plate, A., Rozanski, V. E., Maiostre, J., Levin, J., Dietrich, O., Ertl-Wagner, B. B., Bötzel, K., et al. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2017.04.002 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Antropova, N., Huynh, B. Q., & Giger, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12453 · Cited by 389 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the work of Antropova et al. [91], a method that fuses the extracted and pooled low-and mid-level features using a pre-trained CNN with hand-designed features using conventional CADx methods was applied to three clinical imaging modality datasets, and demonstrated significant performance…”
MethodStandard Plane Localization in Fetal Ultrasound via Domain Transferred Deep Neural Networks
Chen, H., Ni, D., Qin, J., Li, S., Yang, X., Wang, T., & Heng, P. A. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2015.2425041 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Self-citationMedical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017
(2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images
Han, S., Kang, H.-K., Jeong, J.-Y., Park, M.-H., Kim, W., Bang, W.-C., & Seong, Y.-K. (2017) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa82ec · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications
Cornebise, J., Cardoso, J. S., Lu, Z., Loog, M., Nascimento, J. C., Papa, J. P., Belagiannis, V., Tavares, J. M. R. S., Bradley, A. P., Peter, L., et al. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Xian, M., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H. D., Xu, F., Zhang, B., & Ding, J. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.012 · Cited by 284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, few focus on medical US analysis, aside from one or two papers that examine specific tasks such as breast US image segmentation [55].”
BackgroundA pre-trained convolutional neural network based method for thyroid nodule diagnosis
Ma, J., Wu, F., Zhu, J., Xu, D. M., & Kong, D. (2016) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.09.011 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Cheng, P. M., & Malhi, H. S. (2017) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-016-9929-2 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
FUIQA: Fetal Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment with Deep Convolutional Networks
Wu, L., Cheng, J.-Z., Li, S., Lei, B., Wang, T., & Ni, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2671898 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Deep learning based classification of breast tumors with shear-wave elastography
Zhang, Q., Xiao, Y., Dai, W., Suo, J., Wang, C., Shi, J., & Zheng, H. (2016) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.004 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Lekadir, K., Galimzianova, A., Betriu, A., del Mar Vila, M., Igual, L., Rubin, D. L., Fernandez, E., Radeva, P., & Napel, S. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2016.2631401 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Carneiro, G., Nascimento, J. C., & Freitas, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2169273 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Global supervised descent method
Xiong, X., & la Torre, F. D. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298882 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Ultrasound image-based thyroid nodule automatic segmentation using convolutional neural networks
Ma, J., Wu, F., Jiang, T., Zhao, Q., & Kong, D. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1649-7 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Chen, H., Dou, Q., Ni, D., Cheng, J.-Z., Qin, J., Li, S., & Heng, P.-A. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_62 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationShi, J., Zhou, S., Liu, X., Zhang, Q., Lu, M., & Wang, T. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.074 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasound Standard Plane Detection Using a Composite Neural Network Framework
Chen, H., Wu, L., Dou, Q., Qin, J., Li, S., Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., & Heng, P.-A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2685080 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Artificial Agent for Anatomical Landmark Detection in Medical Images
Ghesu, F. C., Georgescu, B., Mansi, T., Neumann, D., Joachim Hornegger, A., & Comaniciu, D. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_27 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Learning and Incorporating Shape Models for Semantic Segmentation
Ravishankar, H., Venkataramani, R., Thiruvenkadam, S. R., Sudhakar, P., & Vaidya, V. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_24 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
3D Deep Learning for Efficient and Robust Landmark Detection in Volumetric Data
Zheng, Y., Liu, D., Georgescu, B., Nguyen, H. V., & Comaniciu, D. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_69 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Reddy, U. M., Filly, R. A., & Copel, J. A. (2008) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000318871.95090.d9 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Burlina, P., Billings, S., Joshi, N., & Albayda, J. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184059 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Jacob, G., Noble, J. A., Behrenbruch, C., Kelion, A. D., & Banning, A. P. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.996341 · Cited by 142 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To address these issues, various conventional machine learning methods such as active contours [127] and deformable templates [128] have been widely used to successfully segment the LV, under the condition of using prior knowledge about the LV shape and appearance.”
MethodMarginal space deep learning: efficient architecture for volumetric image parsing
Ghesu, F. C., Krubasik, E., Georgescu, B., Singh, V., Zheng, Y., Hornegger, J., & Comaniciu, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538802 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Ma, J., Wu, F., Jiang, T., Zhu, J., & Kong, D. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12134 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Deep learning based classification of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Wu, K., Chen, X., & Ding, M. (2014) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.114 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Liver fibrosis classification based on transfer learning and FCNet for ultrasound images
Meng, D., Zhang, L., Cao, G., Cao, W., Zhang, G., & Hu, B. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2689058 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Cascaded Fully Convolutional Networks for automatic prenatal ultrasound image segmentation
Wu, L., Yang, X., Li, S., Wang, T., Heng, P., & Ni, D. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950607 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationCarneiro, G., & Nascimento, J. C. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.96 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Learning to diagnose cirrhosis with liver capsule guided ultrasound image classification
Liu, X., Song, J., Wang, S., Zhao, J., & Chen, Y. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17010149 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Liu, T., Xie, S., Yu, J. S., Niu, L., & Sun, W. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952290 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Yu, Z., Tan, E.-L., Ni, D., Qin, J., Chen, S., Li, S., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2705031 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationBaumgartner, C. F., Kamnitsas, K., Matthew, J., Smith, S., Kainz, B., & Rueckert, D. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_24 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
(2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2529998 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
SLIDE: automatic spine level identification system using a deep convolutional neural network
Hetherington, J., Lessoway, V. A., Gunka, V. B., Abolmaesumi, P., & Rohling, R. N. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1575-8 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Yu, L., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, J., & Chen, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2628401 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The importance of quality management in fetal measurement
Dudley, N. J., & Chapman, E. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00549.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Comparative Study of Deep Learning Software FrameworksPreprint
Bahrampour, S., Ramakrishnan, N., Schott, L., & Shah, M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06435 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Salomon, L. J., Winer, N., Bernard, J. P., & Ville, Y. (2008) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2016 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Fine-Grained Recurrent Neural Networks for Automatic Prostate Segmentation in Ultrasound Images
Yang, X., Yu, L., Wu, L., Wang, Y., Ni, D., Qin, J., & Heng, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10761 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationCoarse-to-Fine Stacked Fully Convolutional Nets for lymph node segmentation in ultrasound images
Zhang, Y., Ying, M. T. C., Yang, L., et al. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2016.7822557 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Machine learning in medical imaging
Shen, D. G., Guorong Wu, A., Zhang, D., Suzuki, K., Wang, F., & Yan, P. (2015) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.02.001 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Automatic Localization of the Needle Target for Ultrasound-Guided Epidural Injections
Pesteie, M., Lessoway, V. A., Abolmaesumi, P., & Rohling, R. N. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2739110 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Deep Belief Networks for Real-Time Extraction of Tongue Contours from Ultrasound During Speech
Fasel, I., & Berry, J. (2010) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2010.369 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Vessel Detection in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Smistad, E., & Løvstakken, L. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Yaqub, M., Kelly, B., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A. (2017) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.013 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Classification of breast lesions using cross-modal deep learning
Hadad, O., Bakalo, R., Ben‐Ari, R., Hashoul, S., & Amit, G. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950480 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ultrasound Aided Vertebral Level Localization for Lumbar Surgery
Baka, N., Leenstra, S., & van Walsum, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2738612 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Breast image feature learning with adaptive deconvolutional networks
Jamieson, A. R., Drukker, K., & Giger, M. L. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.910710 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Towards Automatic Semantic Segmentation in Volumetric Ultrasound
Yang, X., Yu, L., Li, S., Wang, X., Wang, N., Qin, J., Ni, D., & Heng, P.-A. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_81 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomating Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Video Interpretation with Convolutional Neural Networks
Shin, J. Y., Tajbakhsh, N., Hurst, R. T., et al. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.277 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Breast Tumor Detection in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning
Cao, Z., Duan, L., Yang, G., Yue, T., Chen, Q., Fu, H., & Xu, Y. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67434-6_14 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Ravishankar, H., Prabhu, S. M., Vaidya, V., & Singhal, N. (2016) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2016.7493382 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sundaresan, V., Bridge, C. P., Ioannou, C., & Noble, J. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950609 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Guy, A., Ben‐Ari, R., Hadad, O., Monovich, E., Granot, N., & Hashoul, S. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2249981 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Medical Image Understanding and Analysis
(2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Azizi, S., Bayat, S., Yan, P., Tahmasebi, A., Nir, G., Kwak, J. T., Xu, S., Wilson, S., Iczkowski, K. A., Lucia, M. S., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1627-0 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Automatic 3D ultrasound segmentation of the first trimester placenta using deep learning
Looney, P., Stevenson, G. N., Nicolaides, K. H., Plasencia, W., Molloholli, M., Natsis, S., & Collins, S. L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950519 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Describing ultrasound video content using deep convolutional neural networks
Gao, Y., Maraci, M. A., & Noble, J. A. (2016) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2016.7493384 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Azizi, S., Imani, F., Ghavidel, S., Tahmasebi, A., Kwak, J. T., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Choyke, P., Pinto, P., Wood, B., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1395-2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Nie, S., Yu, J., Chen, P., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2017) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.08.034 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationFully Automating Graf’s Method for DDH Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
on behalf of, C. U. D. L., Golan, D., Donner, Y., Mansi, C., Jaremko, J. L., & Ramachandran, M. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_14 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Xu, K., Roussel, P., Csapó, T. G., et al. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4984122 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Clinical Target-Volume Delineation in Prostate Brachytherapy Using Residual Neural Networks
Anas, E. M. A., Nouranian, S., Mahdavi, S. S., Spadinger, I., Morris, W. J., Salcudean, S. E., Mousavi, P., & Abolmaesumi, P. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_42 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Gao, Y., & Noble, J. A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_35 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Carneiro, G., Nascimento, J. C., & Freitas, A. (2010) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2010.5490181 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Automated detection of coarctation of aorta in neonates from two-dimensional echocardiograms
Pereira, F., Bueno, A., Rodriguez, A. B., Perrin, D. P., Marx, G. R., Cardinale, M., Salgo, I. S., & del Nido, P. J. (2017) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.4.1.014502 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Feature selection and thyroid nodule classification using transfer learning
Liu, T., Xie, S., Zhang, Y., Yu, J. S., Niu, L., & Sun, W. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950707 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Bian, C., Lee, R., Chou, Y., & Cheng, J. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_30 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Guo, L., Wang, D., Xu, H., Qian, Y., Wang, C., Xiao, Z., Zhang, Q., & Shi, J. (2017) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8037181 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Selective Search and Sequential Detection for Standard Plane Localization in Ultrasound
Ni, D., Li, T., Yang, X., Qin, J., Li, S., Chin, C.-T., Ouyang, S., Wang, T., & Chen, S. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41083-3_23 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationCarneiro, G., & Nascimento, J. C. (2010) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540013 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Toward automatic diagnosis of hip dysplasia from 2D ultrasound
Hareendranathan, A. R., Zonoobi, D., Mabee, M., et al. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950680 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, Y., Xu, R., Ohya, J., & Iwata, H. (2017) · 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8037116 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Azizi, S., Imani, F., Zhuang, B., et al. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_9 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Azizi, S., Mousavi, P., Yan, P., Tahmasebi, A., Kwak, J. T., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Choyke, P., Pinto, P., Wood, B., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1573-x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Fully Convolutional Regression Network for Accurate Detection of Measurement Points
Sofka, M., Milletarì, F., Jia, J., & Rothberg, A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_30 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Tongue contour extraction from ultrasound images based on deep neural networkPreprint
Jaumard‐Hakoun, A., Xu, K., Roussel-Ragot, P., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.05912 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Improving Needle Detection in 3D Ultrasound Using Orthogonal-Plane Convolutional Networks
Pourtaherian, A., Zanjani, F. G., Zinger, S., Mihajlović, N., Ng, G. C., Korsten, H. H. M., & de With, P. H. N. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_69 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Dezaki, F. T., Dhungel, N., Abdi, A. H., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_12 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Anas, E. M. A., Seitel, A., Rasoulian, A., John, P. S., Pichora, D., Darras, K., Wilson, D., Lessoway, V. A., Hacihaliloglu, I., Mousavi, P., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1181-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Bernard, O., Touil, B., Gelas, A., Prost, R., & Friboulet, D. P. (2007) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2007.4379270 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Automated embolic signal detection using Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Sombune, P., Phienphanich, P., Phuechpanpaisal, S., Muengtaweepongsa, S., Ruamthanthong, A., & Tantibundhit, C. (2017) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8037577 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Fetal facial standard plane recognition via very deep convolutional networks
Yu, Z., Ni, D., Chen, S., Li, S., Wang, T., & Lei, B. (2016) · 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2016.7590780 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated assessment of endometrium from transvaginal ultrasound using Deep Learned Snake
Singhal, N., Mukherjee, S., & Perrey, C. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950520 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Hiramatsu, Y., Muramatsu, C., Kobayashi, H., Hara, T., & Fujita, H. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2254581 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Chen, H., Zheng, Y., Park, J., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.01855 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Fetal Abdominal Standard Plane Localization through Representation Learning with Knowledge Transfer
Chen, H., Ni, D., Yang, X., Li, S., & Heng, P. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10581-9_16 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationMarginal Space Deep Learning: Efficient Architecture for Detection in Volumetric Image Data
Ghesu, F. C., Georgescu, B., Zheng, Y., Joachim Hornegger, A., & Comaniciu, D. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_87 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Weakly Supervised Learning of Placental Ultrasound Images with Residual Networks
Qi, H., Collins, S., & Noble, A. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Deep learning on sparse manifolds for faster object segmentation
Nascimento, J. C., & Carneiro, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2725582 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Carneiro, G., & Nascimento, J. C. (2011) · International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126433 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Milletarì, F., Ahmadi, S., Kroll, C., Hennersperger, C., Tombari, F., Shah, A. M., Plate, A., Boetzel, K., & Navab, N. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_14 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Perrin, D. P., Bueno, A., Rodriguez, A. B., Marx, G. R., & del Nido, P. J. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2254083 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Standard plane localization in ultrasound by radial component
Yang, X., Ni, D., Qin, J., Li, S., Wang, T., Chen, S., & Heng, P. (2014) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2014.6868086 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationSu, S., Gao, Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950713 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Multi-atlas segmentation using manifold learning with deep belief networks
Nascimento, J. C., & Carneiro, G. (2016) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2016.7493403 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Handcrafted features vs ConvNets in 2D echocardiographic images
Raynaud, C., Langet, H., Amzulescu, M. S., et al. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950712 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Carneiro, G., & Nascimento, J. C. (2012) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247770 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Abdominal Imaging. Computation and Clinical Applications
Yoshida, H., Warfield, S. K., & Vannier, M. W. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41083-3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Liu, X., Shi, J., & Zhang, Q. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24888-2_38 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Temporal HeartNet: Towards Human-Level Automatic Analysis of Fetal Cardiac Screening VideoPreprint
Huang, W., Bridge, C. P., Noble, J. A., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.00665 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Abdomen Segmentation in 3D Fetal Ultrasound Using CNN-powered Deformable Models
Schmidt-Richberg, A., Brosch, T., Schadewaldt, N., Klinder, T., Cavallaro, A., Salim, I., Roundhill, D. N., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Cristian Lorenz, A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67561-9_6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Non-rigid Segmentation Using Sparse Low Dimensional Manifolds and Deep Belief Networks
Nascimento, J. C., & Carneiro, G. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.44 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging
(2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00500-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Deep learning with spatiotemporal consistency for nerve segmentation in ultrasound imagesPreprint
Hafiane, A., Vieyres, P., & Delbos, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05870 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A novel method with a deep network and directional edges for automatic detection of a fetal head
Nie, S., Yu, J., Chen, P., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2015) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.1109/eusipco.2015.7362464 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationLipsanen, A., Parkkinen, S., Khabbal, J., Mäkinen, P., Peräniemi, S., Hiltunen, M., & Jolkkonen, J. (2014) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.003 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
CNN-based Estimation of Abdominal Circumference from Ultrasound images.Preprint
Jang, J., Kwon, J., Kim, B., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Automatic Estimation of Fetal Abdominal Circumference from Ultrasound ImagesPreprint
Jang, J., Park, Y., Kim, B., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.02741
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Deng, 2014, Deep learning: methods and applications. Found Trends, Signal Process, 7, 197
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Deep learning in ultrasound imaging
van Sloun, R. J. G., Cohen, R., & Eldar, Y. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2932116 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology
Drukker, L., Noble, J. A., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22122 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Using deep-learning algorithms to classify fetal brain ultrasound images as normal or abnormal
Xie, H. N., Wang, N., He, M., Zhang, L. H., Cai, H. M., Xian, J. B., Lin, M. F., Zheng, J., & Yang, Y. Z. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21967 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
A Generic Quality Control Framework for Fetal Ultrasound Cardiac Four-Chamber Planes
Dong, J., Liu, S., Liao, Y., Wen, H., Lei, B., Li, S., & Wang, T. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2948316 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of artificial intelligence and deep learning in fetal ultrasound imaging
Ramirez Zegarra, R., & Ghi, T. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26130 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Căleanu, C. D., Sîrbu, C. L., & Simion, G. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21124126 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Hsu, S.-T., Su, Y.-J., Hung, C.-H., Chen, M.-J., Lu, C.-H., & Kuo, C.-E. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-02047-6 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
A survey on deep learning in medical ultrasound imaging
Song, K., Feng, J., & Chen, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1398393 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Sendra-Balcells, C., Campello, V. M., Torrents-Barrena, J., Ahmed, Y. A., Elattar, M., Ohene-Botwe, B., Nyangulu, P., Stones, W., Ammar, M., Benamer, L. N., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29490-3 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Automated ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid index using deep learning
Cho, H. C., Sun, S., Min Hyun, C., Kwon, J.-Y., Kim, B., Park, Y., & Seo, J. K. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101951 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Qiao, S., Pang, S., Luo, G., Pan, S., Chen, T., & Lv, Z. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2021.3091579 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Arroyo, J., Marini, T. J., Saavedra, A. C., Toscano, M., Baran, T. M., Drennan, K., Dozier, A., Zhao, Y. T., Egoavil, M., Tamayo, L., et al. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262107 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Model-Agnostic Method for Thoracic Wall Segmentation in Fetal Ultrasound Videos
Shozu, K., Komatsu, M., Sakai, A., Komatsu, R., Dozen, A., Machino, H., Yasutomi, S., Arakaki, T., Asada, K., Kaneko, S., et al. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10121691 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy
Diniz, P. H. B., Yin, Y., & Collins, S. (2020) · EMJ Reproductive Health · doi:10.33590/emjreprohealth/20-00100 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Al-karawi, D., Al-Assam, H., Du, H., Sayasneh, A., Landolfo, C., Timmerman, D., Bourne, T., & Jassim, S. (2021) · Ultrasonic Imaging · doi:10.1177/0161734621998091 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Multimodal Medical Image Analysis
Xu, Y. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32962-4_18 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Fully Automated Analysis of Muscle Architecture from B-Mode Ultrasound Images with DL_Track_US
Ritsche, P., Franchi, M. V., Faude, O., Finni, T., Seynnes, O., & Cronin, N. J. (2024) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.10.011 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wang, X., Bao, N., Xin, X., Tan, J., Li, H., Zhou, S., & Liu, H. (2022) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-1155 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Kuang, B., Gu, C., Rana, Z. A., Zhao, Y., Sun, S., & Nnabuife, S. G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22218393 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Nasimova, N., Muminov, B., Nasimov, R., Abdurashidova, K., & Abdullaev, M. (2021) · 2021 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT) · doi:10.1109/icisct52966.2021.9670134 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Sriraam, N., Punyaprabha, V., Sushma, T. V., & Suresh, S. (2023) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-023-02814-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, S., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Lei, B., Liu, L., Li, S. X., Ni, D., & Wang, T.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yi
- Ni, Dong
- Wang, Tianfu
- Venue
- Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-275
- ISSN
- 2095-8099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913559493
- Semantic Scholar
- 0b706160de638668f72587b9df21f6361f57add4
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 40.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61571304, 81571758, 61701312)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0104703)
- Shenzhen Peacock Plan (KQTD2016053112051497)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- ultrasonography, deep learning, image classification, object detection, image segmentation, deep learning architectures, diagnostic support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review