The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples
Open accessAbstract
Understanding and quantifying the mechanical properties of breast tissues has been a subject of interest for the past two decades. This has been motivated in part by interest in modelling soft tissue response for surgery planning and virtual-reality-based surgical training. Interpreting elastography images for diagnostic purposes also requires a sound understanding of normal and pathological tissue mechanical properties. Reliable data on tissue elastic properties are very limited and those which are available tend to be inconsistent, in part as a result of measurement methodology. We have developed specialized techniques to measure tissue elasticity of breast normal tissues and tumour specimens and applied them to 169 fresh ex vivo breast tissue samples including fat and fibroglandular tissue as well as a range of benign and malignant breast tumour types. Results show that, under small deformation conditions, the elastic modulus of normal breast fat and fibroglandular tissues are similar while fibroadenomas were approximately twice the stiffness. Fibrocystic disease and malignant tumours exhibited a 3-6-fold increased stiffness with high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma exhibiting up to a 13-fold increase in stiffness compared to fibrogalndular tissue. A statistical analysis showed that differences between the elastic modulus of the majority of those tissues were statistically significant. Implications for the specificity advantages of elastography are reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast
Van Houten, E. E. W., Doyley, M. M., Kennedy, F. E., Weaver, J. B., & Paulsen, K. D. (2003) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.10232 · Cited by 224
Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions, and breast parenchyma
Nathanson, S. D., & Nelson, L. (1994) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf03187139 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Tissue–electronics interfaces: from implantable devices to engineered tissues
Feiner, R., & Dvir, T. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.76 · Cited by 595
A history of exploring cancer in context
Maman, S., & Witz, I. P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0006-7 · Cited by 502
Challenges of applying multicellular tumor spheroids in preclinical phase
Han, S. J., Kwon, S., & Kim, K. S. (2021) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-021-01853-8 · Cited by 428
Synthetic Materials in the Study of Cell Response to Substrate Rigidity
Nemir, S., & West, J. L. (2010) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-009-9811-1 · Cited by 318
Biophysics of tumor microenvironment and cancer metastasis – a mini review
Emon, B., Bauer, J., Jain, Y., Jung, B., & Saif, T. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.003 · Cited by 245
Decellularized Extracellular Matrix for Bioengineering Physiomimetic 3D in Vitro Tumor Models
Ferreira, L. P., Gaspar, V. M., & Mano, J. F. (2020) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.006 · Cited by 153
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Mechanosensing in macrophages and dendritic cells in steady-state and disease
Lee, M., Du, H., Winer, D. A., Clemente-Casares, X., & Tsai, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.1044729 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Samani, A., Zubovits, J., & Plewes, D.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-02-16
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1565-1576
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2056554708
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.