Cited by 122Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsEffects of Radiation Exposure

A bone marrow toxicity model for 223 Ra alpha-emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy

Open access
Hobbs, Robert F, Song, Hong, Watchman, Christopher J, Bolch, Wesley E, Aksnes, Anne-Kirsti, Ramdahl, Thomas, Flux, Glenn D, Sgouros, George·2012·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Ra-223, an α-particle emitting bone-seeking radionuclide, has recently been used in clinical trials for osseous metastases of prostate cancer. We investigated the relationship between absorbed fraction-based red marrow dosimetry and cell level-dosimetry using a model that accounts for the expected localization of this agent relative to marrow cavity architecture. We show that cell level-based dosimetry is essential to understanding potential marrow toxicity. The GEANT4 software package was used to create simple spheres representing marrow cavities. Ra-223 was positioned on the trabecular bone surface or in the endosteal layer and simulated for decay, along with the descendants. The interior of the sphere was divided into cell-size voxels and the energy was collected in each voxel and interpreted as dose cell histograms. The average absorbed dose values and absorbed fractions were also calculated in order to compare those results with previously published values. The absorbed dose was predominantly deposited near the trabecular surface. The dose cell histogram results were used to plot the percentage of cells that received a potentially toxic absorbed dose (2 or 4 Gy) as a function of the average absorbed dose over the marrow cavity. The results show (1) a heterogeneous distribution of cellular absorbed dose, strongly dependent on the position of the cell within the marrow cavity; and (2) that increasing the average marrow cavity absorbed dose, or equivalently, increasing the administered activity resulted in only a small increase in potential marrow toxicity (i.e. the number of cells receiving more than 4 or 2 Gy), for a range of average marrow cavity absorbed doses from 1 to 20 Gy. The results from the trabecular model differ markedly from a standard absorbed fraction method while presenting comparable average dose values. These suggest that increasing the amount of radioactivity may not substantially increase the risk of toxicity, a result unavailable to the absorbed fraction method of dose calculation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/3207

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For bone-targeting alpha RPT such as 223RaCl2, a calculated average marrow absorbed dose will overestimate the potential biologic impact.

    “Average marrow absorbed dose from antibody, peptide, or small molecule -based a RPT is likely to predict hematologic toxicity whereas bone targeting agents such as 223 RaCl2 will overestimate the potential biologic impact of a calculated average marrow absorbed dose ( 45 ).”
  • Average marrow absorbed dose from antibody, peptide, or small molecule-based alpha RPT is likely to predict hematologic toxicity.

    “Average marrow absorbed dose from antibody, peptide, or small molecule -based a RPT is likely to predict hematologic toxicity whereas bone targeting agents such as 223 RaCl2 will overestimate the potential biologic impact of a calculated average marrow absorbed dose ( 45 ).”

    From Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns (2021) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that average marrow dose may not reflect biological outcome for bone-targeted ²²³Ra therapy. The Introduction mentions radioimmunotherapy, but our copy does not say that average marrow dose predicts hematologic toxicity for antibody-, peptide-, or small-molecule-based alpha therapy (searched those agent types and the proposed dose–toxicity relationship). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]ICRP Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values 2003 Vol 89 Pergammon Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobbs, R. F., Song, H., Watchman, C. J., Bolch, W. E., Aksnes, A.-K., Ramdahl, T., Flux, G. D., & Sgouros, G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hobbs, Robert F
  • Watchman, Christopher J
  • Bolch, Wesley E
  • Aksnes, Anne-Kirsti
  • Ramdahl, Thomas
  • Flux, Glenn D
  • Sgouros, George
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
3207-3222
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2109768758
Cited by
122
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000064)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA157542, R01CA116477)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
radium-223, alpha-emitting radiopharmaceuticals, myelosuppression, fraction absorbed, trabecular bone, bone-seeking radionuclides, prostate cancer bone metastasis, absorbed dose distribution, Geant4 simulation
MeSH terms
Alpha Particles, Bone Marrow, Models, Biological, Radiation Dosage, Radium, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review