The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology
Open accessAbstract
Accurate quantification in PET and SPECT requires correction for a number of physical factors, such as photon attenuation, Compton scattering and random coincidences (in PET). Another factor affecting quantification is the limited spatial resolution. While considerable effort has gone into development of routine correction techniques for the former factors, less attention has been paid to the latter. Spatial resolution-related effects, referred to as 'partial volume effects' (PVEs), depend not only on the characteristics of the imaging system but also on the object and activity distribution. Spatial and/or temporal variations in PVE can often be confounding factors. Partial volume correction (PVC) could in theory be achieved by some kind of inverse filtering technique, reversing the effect of the system PSF. However, these methods are limited, and usually lead to noise-amplification or image artefacts. Some form of regularization is therefore needed, and this can be achieved using information from co-registered anatomical images, such as CT or MRI. The purpose of this paper is to enhance understanding of PVEs and to review possible approaches for PVC. We also present a review of clinical applications of PVC within the fields of neurology, cardiology and oncology, including specific examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610
Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B
Klunk, W. E., Engler, H., Nordberg, A., Wang, Y., Blomqvist, G., Holt, D. P., Bergström, M., Savitcheva, I., Huang, G., Estrada, S., et al. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20009 · Cited by 4,496
Automatically Parcellating the Human Cerebral Cortex
Fischl, B. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · Cited by 4,253
Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data
Hudson, H. M., & Larkin, R. S. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.363108 · Cited by 3,711
Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
Klein, A., Andersson, J., Ardekani, B. A., Ashburner, J., Avants, B., Chiang, M.-C., Christensen, G. E., Collins, D. L., Gee, J., Hellier, P., et al. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · Cited by 2,227
Young, H., Baum, R., Cremerius, U., Herholz, K., Hoekstra, O., Lammertsma, A. A., Pruim, J., & Price, P. (1999) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00229-4 · Cited by 1,720
Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging
Soret, M., Bacharach, S. L., & Buvat, I. (2007) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.106.035774 · Cited by 1,549
Self-citationOllinger, J. M., & Fessler, J. A. (1997) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.560323 · Cited by 1,167
Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size
Hoffman, E. J., Huang, S.-C., & Phelps, M. E. (1979) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-197906000-00001 · Cited by 1,143
Cited by
Ljungberg, M., Celler, A., Konijnenberg, M. W., Eckerman, K. F., Dewaraja, Y. K., & Sjögreen-Gleisner, K. (2016) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.159012 · Cited by 369
Cortical surface-based analysis reduces bias and variance in kinetic modeling of brain PET data
Greve, D. N., Svarer, C., Fisher, P. M., Feng, L., Hansen, A. E., Baare, W., Rosen, B., Fischl, B., & Knudsen, G. M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.021 · Cited by 264
Mecca, A. P., O'Dell, R. S., Sharp, E. S., Banks, E. R., Bartlett, H. H., Zhao, W., Lipior, S., Diepenbrock, N. G., Chen, M., Naganawa, M., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12582 · Cited by 186
Assessment of a white matter reference region for 11 C-UCB-J PET quantification
Rossano, S., Toyonaga, T., Finnema, S. J., Naganawa, M., Lu, Y., Nabulsi, N., Ropchan, J., De Bruyn, S., Otoul, C., Stockis, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x19879230 · Cited by 126
A bone marrow toxicity model for 223 Ra alpha-emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy
Hobbs, R. F., Song, H., Watchman, C. J., Bolch, W. E., Aksnes, A.-K., Ramdahl, T., Flux, G. D., & Sgouros, G. (2012) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/3207 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Erlandsson, K., Buvat, I., Pretorius, P. H., Thomas, B. A., & Hutton, B. F.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-10-16
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- R119-R159
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1975127965
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 73.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/r119
- The paper
- Erlandsson, K., Buvat, I., Pretorius, P. H., Thomas, B. A., & Hutton, B. F. (2012). A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/r119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
