The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
Open accessAbstract
The accuracy of absorbed dose calculations in personalized internal radionuclide therapy is directly related to the accuracy of the activity (or activity concentration) estimates obtained at each of the imaging time points. MIRD Pamphlet no. 23 presented a general overview of methods that are required for quantitative SPECT imaging. The present document is next in a series of isotope-specific guidelines and recommendations that follow the general information that was provided in MIRD 23. This paper focuses on (177)Lu (lutetium) and its application in radiopharmaceutical therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography
Shepp, L. A., & Vardi, Y. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.1982.4307558 · Cited by 4,429
Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data
Hudson, H. M., & Larkin, R. S. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.363108 · Cited by 3,711
Kwekkeboom, D. J., de Herder, W. W., Kam, B. L., van Eijck, C. H., van Essen, M., Kooij, P. P., Feelders, R. A., van Aken, M. O., & Krenning, E. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.2553 · Cited by 1,456
Stabin, M. G., Sparks, R. B., & Crowe, E. A. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 1,350
4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research
Segars, W. P., Sturgeon, G., Mendonca, S., Grimes, J., & Tsui, B. M. W. (2010) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3480985 · Cited by 1,287
Erlandsson, K., Buvat, I., Pretorius, P. H., Thomas, B. A., & Hutton, B. F. (2012) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/r119 · Cited by 733
Imhof, A., Brunner, P., Marincek, N., Briel, M., Schindler, C., Rasch, H., Mäcke, H. R., Rochlitz, C., Müller-Brand, J., & Walter, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.33.7873 · Cited by 641
A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT
Ogawa, K., Harata, Y., Ichihara, T., Kubo, A., & Hashimoto, S. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.97591 · Cited by 616
A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics
Ljungberg, M., & Strand, S.-E. (1989) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(89)90111-9 · Cited by 515
Self-citationBander, N. H., Milowsky, M. I., Nanus, D. M., Kostakoglu, L., Vallabhajosula, S., & Goldsmith, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.160 · Cited by 509
Cited by
Peters, S. M. B., Privé, B. M., de Bakker, M., de Lange, F., Jentzen, W., Eek, A., Muselaers, C. H. J., Mehra, N., Witjes, J. A., Gotthardt, M., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05471-4 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljungberg, M., Celler, A., Konijnenberg, M. W., Eckerman, K. F., Dewaraja, Y. K., & Sjögreen-Gleisner, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2015-10-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-162
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2175610922
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.115.159012
- The paper
- Ljungberg, M., Celler, A., Konijnenberg, M. W., Eckerman, K. F., Dewaraja, Y. K., & Sjögreen-Gleisner, K. (2016). MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.159012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
