The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory
Open accessAbstract
A review of the experimental and theoretical determinations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is given. The anomaly is defined by a= (g− 2)/2, where the Landé g-factor is the proportionality constant that relates the spin to the magnetic moment. For the muon, as well as for the electron and tauon, the anomaly a differs slightly from zero (of the order 10−3) because of radiative corrections. In the Standard Model, contributions to the anomaly come from virtual ‘loops’ containing photons and the known massive particles. The relative contribution from heavy particles scales as the square of the lepton mass over the heavy mass, leading to small differences in the anomaly for e, μ and τ. If there are heavy new particles outside the Standard Model which couple to photons and/or leptons, the relative effect on the muon anomaly will be ∼ (mμ/me)2≈ 43 × 10 3 larger compared with the electron anomaly. Because both the theoretical and experimental values of the muon anomaly are determined to high precision, it is an excellent place to search for the effects of new physics or to constrain speculative extensions to the Standard Model. Details of the current theoretical evaluation and of the series of experiments that culminates with E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, are given. At present the theoretical and the experimental values are known with a similar relative precision of 0.5 ppm. There is, however, a 3.4 standard-deviation difference between the two, strongly suggesting the need for continued experimental and theoretical study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eidelman, S., Hayes, K. G., Olive, K. A., Aguilar-Benitez, M., Amsler, C., Asner, D., Babu, K. S., Barnett, R. M., Beringer, J., Burchat, P. R., et al. (2004) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.001 · Cited by 6,673
al, W.-M. Y. E. (2006) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001 · Cited by 4,087
The quantum theory of the electron
Dirac, P. A. M. (1928) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023 · Cited by 3,657
Final report of the E821 muon anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL
Bennett, G. W., Bousquet, B., Brown, H. N., Bunce, G., Carey, R. M., Cushman, P., Danby, G. T., Debevec, P. T., Deile, M., Deng, H., et al. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.072003 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citationExperimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay
Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., & Hudson, R. P. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.105.1413 · Cited by 2,225
Chiral quarks and the non-relativistic quark model
Manohar, A., & Georgi, H. (1984) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90231-1 · Cited by 1,926
Precession of the Polarization of Particles Moving in a Homogeneous Electromagnetic Field
Bargmann, V., Michel, L., & Telegdi, V. L. (1959) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.2.435 · Cited by 1,201
On Quantum-Electrodynamics and the Magnetic Moment of the Electron
Schwinger, J. (1948) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.73.416 · Cited by 1,188
Measurement of the Negative Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.7 ppm
Bennett, G. W., Bousquet, B., Brown, H. N., Bunce, G., Carey, R. M., Cushman, P., Danby, G. T., Debevec, P. T., Deile, M., Deng, H., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.161802 · Cited by 855
Self-citationHopf Algebras, Renormalization and Noncommutative Geometry
Connes, A., & Kreimer, D. (1998) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s002200050499 · Cited by 786
Cited by
The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
Ellwanger, U., Hugonie, C., & Teixeira, A. M. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 · Cited by 992
High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio
Ulmer, S., Smorra, C., Mooser, A., Franke, K., Nagahama, H., Schneider, G., Higuchi, T., Van Gorp, S., Blaum, K., Matsuda, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14861 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, J. P., de Rafael, E., & Lee Roberts, B.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- R03
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2022033127
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 27.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/70/5/r03
- The paper
- Miller, J. P., de Rafael, E., & Lee Roberts, B. (2007). Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/5/r03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.