The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ROTATION PERIODS OF 34,030 KEPLER MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: THE FULL AUTOCORRELATION SAMPLE
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed three years of data from the Kepler space mission to derive rotation periods of main-sequence stars below 6500 K. Our automated autocorrelation-based method detected rotation periods between 0.2 and 70 days for 34,030 (25.6%) of the 133,030 main-sequence Kepler targets (excluding known eclipsing binaries and Kepler Objects of Interest), making this the largest sample of stellar rotation periods to date. In this paper we consider the detailed features of the now well-populated period–temperature distribution and demonstrate that the period bimodality, first seen by McQuillan et al. in the M-dwarf sample, persists to higher masses, becoming less visible above 0.6 M ☉ . We show that these results are globally consistent with the existing ground-based rotation-period data and find that the upper envelope of the period distribution is broadly consistent with a gyrochronological age of 4.5 Gyr, based on the isochrones of Barnes, Mamajek, & Hillenbrand and Meibom et al. We also performed a detailed comparison of our results to those of Reinhold et al. and Nielsen et al., who measured rotation periods of field stars observed by Kepler . We examined the amplitude of periodic variability for the stars with detection rotation periods, and found a typical range between ∼950 ppm (5th percentile) and ∼22,700 ppm (95th percentile), with a median of ∼5600 ppm. We found typically higher amplitudes for shorter periods and lower effective temperatures, with an excess of low-amplitude stars above ∼5400 K.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kepler planet-detection mission: Introduction and first results
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T., Caldwell, D., Caldwell, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185402 · Cited by 4,035
Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Ventura, P. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021560 · Cited by 853
Cited by
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
THE Hα EMISSION OF NEARBY M DWARFS AND ITS RELATION TO STELLAR ROTATION
Newton, E. R., Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., Berlind, P., Calkins, M. L., & Mink, J. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/85 · Cited by 359
The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars
Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.003 · Cited by 319
A STELLAR-MASS-DEPENDENT DROP IN PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES
Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/112 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- McQuillan, A., Mazeh, T., & Aigrain, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-03-26
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 24
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2104154288
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROTATION PERIODS OF 34,030 KEPLER MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: THE FULL AUTOCORRELATION SAMPLE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/24
- The paper
- McQuillan, A., Mazeh, T., & Aigrain, S. (2014). ROTATION PERIODS OF 34,030 KEPLER MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: THE FULL AUTOCORRELATION SAMPLE. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.