The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A STELLAR-MASS-DEPENDENT DROP IN PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES
Open accessAbstract
The Kepler spacecraft has discovered a large number of planets with up to one-year periods and down to terrestrial sizes. While the majority of the target stars are main-sequence dwarfs of spectral type F, G, and K, Kepler covers stars with effective temperatures as low as 2500 K, which corresponds to M stars. These cooler stars allow characterization of small planets near the habitable zone, yet it is not clear if this population is representative of that around FGK stars. In this paper, we calculate the occurrence of planets around stars of different spectral types as a function of planet radius and distance from the star and show that they are significantly different from each other. We further identify two trends. First, the occurrence of Earth- to Neptune-sized planets (1–4 R ⊕ ) is successively higher toward later spectral types at all orbital periods probed by Kepler ; planets around M stars occur twice as frequently as around G stars, and thrice as frequently as around F stars. Second, a drop in planet occurrence is evident at all spectral types inward of a ∼10 day orbital period, with a plateau further out. By assigning to each spectral type a median stellar mass, we show that the distance from the star where this drop occurs is stellar mass dependent, and scales with semi-major axis as the cube root of stellar mass. By comparing different mechanisms of planet formation, trapping, and destruction, we find that this scaling best matches the location of the pre-main-sequence co-rotation radius, indicating efficient trapping of migrating planets or planetary building blocks close to the star. These results demonstrate the stellar-mass dependence of the planet population, both in terms of occurrence rate and of orbital distribution. The prominent stellar-mass dependence of the inner boundary of the planet population shows that the formation or migration of planets is sensitive to the stellar parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D. C., & Keil, K. (2007) · Cited by 2,831
A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way
Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031117 · Cited by 2,039
A SURVEY OF STELLAR FAMILIES: MULTIPLICITY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS
Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., Latham, D. W., Marcy, G. W., Mason, B. D., Gies, D. R., White, R. J., & ten Brummelaar, T. A. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 · Cited by 1,853
The Planet‐Metallicity Correlation
Fischer, D. A., & Valenti, J. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428383 · Cited by 1,654
Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380606a0 · Cited by 1,235
PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, T. N., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/15 · Cited by 1,151
THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Bryson, S. T., Christiansen, J., Dressing, C. D., Jenkins, J. M., Walkowicz, L. M., & Batalha, N. M. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/81 · Cited by 1,139
PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 · Cited by 1,042
KEPLER PLANETS: A TALE OF EVAPORATION
Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/105 · Cited by 803
THE OCCURRENCE RATE OF SMALL PLANETS AROUND SMALL STARS
Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/95 · Cited by 749
Cited by
The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., Winn, J. N., Weiss, L. M., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Sinukoff, E., Isaacson, H., Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa54c · Cited by 363
The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars
Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.003 · Cited by 319
Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars
Kunimoto, M., & Matthews, J. M. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab88b0 · Cited by 139
Harrison, T. M. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46687-9 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2015-01-06
- Volume
- 798
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2079333065
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A STELLAR-MASS-DEPENDENT DROP IN PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/112
- The paper
- Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. (2015). A STELLAR-MASS-DEPENDENT DROP IN PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.