Cited by 319Advanced Operator Algebra ResearchRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in generally covariant quantum theories

Open access
Connes, A, Rovelli, C·1994·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We consider the cluster of problems raised by the relation between the notion of time, gravitational theory, quantum theory and thermodynamics; in particular, we address the problem of relating the `timelessness' of the hypothetical, fundamental generally covariant quantum field theory with the `evidence' of the flow of time. By using the algebraic formulation of quantum theory, we propose a unifying perspective on these problems, based on the hypothesis that in a generally covariant quantum theory the physical time flow is not a universal property of the mechanical theory, but rather it is determined by the thermodynamical state of the system (`thermal time hypothesis'). We implement this hypothesis by using a key structural property of von Neumann algebras: the Tomita--Takesaki theorem, which allows us to derive a time flow, namely a one-parameter group of automorphisms of the observable algebra, from a generic thermal physical state. We study this time flow, its classical limit, and we relate it to various characteristic theoretical facts, such as the Unruh temperature and the Hawking radiation. We point out the existence of a state-independent notion of `time', given by the canonical one-parameter subgroup of outer automorphisms provided by the co-cycle Radon--Nikodym theorem.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/11/12/007

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    The temperature detected by a thermometer moving in |0> with acceleration a is beta = 2pi/a, the Unruh temperature.

    “We obtain B = 2n/a, namely which is the Unruh temperature 151, or the temperature detected by a thermometer moving in 10) with acceleration a.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [151]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    The thermal time defined by the cosmic background radiation is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.

    “In [ll], it was shown that the thermal time defined by the cosmic background radiation is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [ll]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation can be modeled by a Robertson-Walker cosmological model.
  • Findingreasoning

    For a Gibbs density matrix, the modular flow is the time flow generated by the Hamiltonian, with time rescaled as t -> beta t.

    “The modular flow of w is (29) namely it is the time flow generated by the Hamiltonian, with the time rescaled as t + pt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    In a generally covariant theory with no preferred dynamics or Hamiltonian, a flow called the thermal time of p is determined by any thermal state p.

    “In a generally covariant theory, in which no preferred dynamics and no preferred Hamiltonian are given, a flow a : .which we will call the thermal time of p, is determined by any thermal state p.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics cannot be formulated in terms of evolution in a single external time parameter.
  • Premisecitation

    In a model of gravity plus electromagnetic field, the explicitly constructed state p yields a thermal time that is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.

    “In [ 1 I], the state p was explicitly constructed.Then, the thermal time corresponding to p was computed.The result turns out to be precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time, namely the flow that we identify as the true time flow in OUT universe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Ashtekar A, 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 14
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The state-independent characterization of time is given by the cocycle Radon-Nikodym theorem: thermal time is unique up to inner automorphisms.

    “The stateindependent characterization of time is then given by the co-cycle Radon-Nikodym theorem: thermal time is unique up to inner automorphisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Gibbs J W, 1902

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In general relativity no selection of an internal time is known that leads to a well-defined fully non-parametrized dynamical system.

    “The first difficulty is that in general relativity no selection of an internal time is known, which leads to a well defined fully non-parametrized dynamical system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The quantum evolution generated by an arbitrary internal time lacks unitarity.

    “Second, because the corresponding quantum evolution lacks unitarily, and the problem is open whether this fact jeopardizes the consistency of the interpretation of the quantum formalism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    If a generally covariant system has a very large number of degrees of freedom and we describe our best experimental knowledge of its state as a distribution on its state space, then the flow determined by this distribution coincides with what we perceive as the physical flow of time.

    “if we have a generally covariant system with a very large number of degrees of freedom (say, the universe including the gravitational field), and we describe our best experimental knowledge of its state as a distribution on its state space, then theflow determined by this distribution coincides precisely with what we perceive as the physical flow of time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    In the canonical formulation of a generally covariant theory, there is no Hamiltonian defined on the phase space, but the smooth functions on the phase space contain dynamical information implicitly.

    “In the canonical formulation of a generally covariant theory, therefore, there is no Hamiltonian defined on the phase space, but the phase space is a highly nontrivial object, and the smooth functions on the phase space, namely the generally covariant observables, contain dynamical information implicitly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    In a generally covariant quantum field theory, the physical time is the modular flow of the thermal state.

    “We extend the thermal time assumption to the quantum theory, by postulating that: the physical time is the modular flow of the thermal state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Non-commutative von Neumann algebras are dynamical objects and inherit a natural time evolution from their non-commutativity.

    “it means that the non-commutative (von Neumann) algebras are dynamical objects and inherit a natural time evolution from their non-commutativity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Rovelli C, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    There is intrinsically no way of constructing a physical clock that is not affected by the gravitational field.

    “There is intrinsically no way of constructing a physical clock that is not atfected by the gravitational field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Tomita-Takesaki theorem associates to a faithful normal state on a von Neumann algebra a one-parameter group of modular automorphisms of the algebra.

    “The Tomita-Takesaki theorem [15] states that the map 01, defined by”
    • Also stated in: § 2.1. Modular automorphism · plain
      “leaves R globally invariant and hence defines a one-parameter group of automorphisms of the algebra R.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Connes A, 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Hamilton equations and the Gibbs postulate are both contained in the Tomita-Takesaki relation (8).

    “The Hamilton equations (49) and the Gibbs postulate (SO), are both contained in the Tomita-Takesaki relation (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a generally covariant quantum context, the algebra itself determines the allowed time flows, providing a possibility of capturing an abstract fully state-independent notion of time evolution.

    “However, in a generally covariant quantum context this observation provides us with the possibility of capturing an abstract fully state-independent notion of time evolution.In fact, it is the algebra itself that determines the allowed time flows.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The fact that time is determined by the state, and therefore the system is always in an equilibrium state with respect to the thermal time flow, does not imply that evolution is frozen or that we cannot detect any dynamical change.

    “The fact that the time is determined by the state, adtherefore the system is always in an equilibrium state with respect to the thermal time flow, does not imply that evolution is frozen, and we cannot detect any dynamical change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Temperature is interpreted as the ratio between thermal time and geometrical time, defined only when geometrical time is meaningful.

    “Thus, within the present scheme the temperature is interpreted as the ratio between thermal time and geometrical time, defined only when the second is meaningfult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the classical limit, there is a classical Hamiltonian H that generates the Hamilton evolution, and the state p is related to this Hamiltonian by the Gibbs relation.

    “Thus we obtain the result that there is a classical Hamiltonian H that generates the Hamilton evolution, and that the state p is related to this Hamiltonian by the Gibbs relation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In a quantum system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, what we generally measure is the effect of small perturbations around a thermal state.

    “In a quantum system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, what we generally measure is the effect of small perturbations around a thermal state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Physical time has a thermodynamical origin.

    “The hypothesis that we have put forward in this paper is that physical time has a thermodynamical origin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Following Unruh's initial suggestion, the construction can be generalized to the Schwarzschild solution; an observer at rest in Schwarzschild coordinates undergoes constant acceleration away from the black hole, and the result allows one to derive the Hawking temperature.

    “Following Unruh's initial suggestion [5], this construction can be immediately generalized to the Schwarzschild solution-an observer at rest in the Schwarzschild coordinates undergoes a constant acceleration pointing away from the black hol e. -and the result allows one to derive the Hawking temperature [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] source
    • cites [6] Rovelli C, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    In general, the modular flow is not an inner automorphism of the algebra; there is no Hamiltonian in R that generates it.

    “In general, the modular flow is not an inner automorphism of the algebra, namely, there is no Hamiltonian in R that generates it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The physical time depends on the state; when the system is in a state omega, the physical time is given by the modular group alpha_t^omega of omega.

    “The physical time depends on the state.When the system is in a state o, the physical time is given by the modular group a( of o.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In a generally covariant theory, notions of time tend to be state dependent.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While different states over a von Neumann algebra define distinct time flows, it is possible to define a state-independent flow.

    “As shown in section 2, while different states over a von Neumann algebra R define distinct time flows, still it is possible to define a state-independent flow, in the following sense.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These relations hold in general for a generally covariant theory; however, the Hamiltonian H does not determine the Gibbs state, but rather is determined by any thermal state.

    “These relations hold, in general, for a generally covariant theory; however, we recall that the Hamiltonian H plays a quite different role than in a non-relativistic theory: it does not determine the Gibbs state, but, rather, it is determined by any thermal state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    In a generally covariant situation, the thermal time is the only definition of time available.

    “In a generally covariant situation, the thermal time is the only definition of time available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    General covariance implies that the Hamiltonian vanishes weakly.

    “General covariance implies that the Hamiltonian vanishes weakly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    In conventional quantum field theory, all information can be extracted in terms of vacuum expectation values of products of field operators, i.e. by means of a single quantum state |0>.

    “In conventional quantum field theory we can extract all the information in terms of vacuum expectation values of products of fields operators, namely by means of a single quantum state IO).This was emphasized by Wight”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wight

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The restriction of the observables algebra to the Rindler wedge determines a time flow; similarly the restriction to a different fixed region of spacetime defines a corresponding time flow.

    “For instance, as the restriction of the observables algebra to the Rindler wedge determines a time flow, similarly the restriction to a different fixed region of spacetime defines a corresponding time flow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In a special relativistic system, a thermal state breaks Lorentz invariance; the average momentum of a gas at finite temperature defines a preferred Lorentz frame.

    “In a special relativistic system, a thermal state breaks Lorentz invariance.For instance, the average momentum of a gas at finite temperature defines a preferred Lorentz frame.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [Ill]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The notion of a preferred 'flowing' time has no mechanical meaning at the quantum generally covariant level, but rather has a thermodynamical origin.

    “The hypothesis that we explore in this paper is that the notion of a preferred 'flowing' time has no mechanical meaning at the quantum generally covariant level, but rather has a thermodynamical origin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
27 of 27
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.

    “We simply assume that a generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The ensemble of quantum observables form a non-Abelian C*-algebra.

    “We assume that the ensemble of the quantum observables form a non-Abelian C-algebra, which we denote as A.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The quantum algebra A is a deformation of (a subalgebra of) the classical Poisson algebra.

    “assume that the quantum algebra A is a deformation of (a subalgebra of) the classical Poisson algebra.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics cannot be formulated in terms of evolution in a single external time parameter.

    “In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics of the theory cannot be formulated in terms of an evolution in a single external time parameter.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the presence of thermal or quantum superpositions of geometries, the spacetime causal structure is lost.

    “because in the presence of thermal or quantum 'superpositions' of geometries the spacetime causal structure is lost.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The universe around us is in a state of non-zero temperature.

    “If we take into account the fact that the universe around us is in a state of non-zero temperature, this means that the information about the dynamics can be fully replaced by the information about the thermal state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In field theory, we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.

    “Notice that in field theory we are always in such a thermodynamical context, because we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a generally covariant theory, notions of time tend to be state dependent.

    “The set of considerations above, and, in particular, the observation that in a generally covariant theory notions of time tend to be state dependent, lead us to make the following hypothesis.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation can be modeled by a Robertson-Walker cosmological model.

    “let us model the physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation by means of a Robertson-Walker cosmological model filled”
9 of 9

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bergmann P G, 1956, Helv. Phys. Acta Suppl., 4, 79
  2. Rovelli C, 1994, Nuovo Cimento

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Connes, A., & Rovelli, C.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1994-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2899-2917
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1994766604
Cited by
319
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9311465)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
von Neumann algebras, thermal time hypothesis, passage of time, timelessness, Unruh temperature, Hawking radiation, one-parameter groups of automorphisms, outer automorphisms, algebraic quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review