The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in generally covariant quantum theories
Open accessAbstract
We consider the cluster of problems raised by the relation between the notion of time, gravitational theory, quantum theory and thermodynamics; in particular, we address the problem of relating the `timelessness' of the hypothetical, fundamental generally covariant quantum field theory with the `evidence' of the flow of time. By using the algebraic formulation of quantum theory, we propose a unifying perspective on these problems, based on the hypothesis that in a generally covariant quantum theory the physical time flow is not a universal property of the mechanical theory, but rather it is determined by the thermodynamical state of the system (`thermal time hypothesis'). We implement this hypothesis by using a key structural property of von Neumann algebras: the Tomita--Takesaki theorem, which allows us to derive a time flow, namely a one-parameter group of automorphisms of the observable algebra, from a generic thermal physical state. We study this time flow, its classical limit, and we relate it to various characteristic theoretical facts, such as the Unruh temperature and the Hawking radiation. We point out the existence of a state-independent notion of `time', given by the canonical one-parameter subgroup of outer automorphisms provided by the co-cycle Radon--Nikodym theorem.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
The temperature detected by a thermometer moving in |0> with acceleration a is beta = 2pi/a, the Unruh temperature.
“We obtain B = 2n/a, namely which is the Unruh temperature 151, or the temperature detected by a thermometer moving in 10) with acceleration a.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The thermal time defined by the cosmic background radiation is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.
“In [ll], it was shown that the thermal time defined by the cosmic background radiation is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [ll]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation can be modeled by a Robertson-Walker cosmological model.
- Findingreasoning
For a Gibbs density matrix, the modular flow is the time flow generated by the Hamiltonian, with time rescaled as t -> beta t.
“The modular flow of w is (29) namely it is the time flow generated by the Hamiltonian, with the time rescaled as t + pt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a generally covariant theory with no preferred dynamics or Hamiltonian, a flow called the thermal time of p is determined by any thermal state p.
“In a generally covariant theory, in which no preferred dynamics and no preferred Hamiltonian are given, a flow a : .which we will call the thermal time of p, is determined by any thermal state p.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics cannot be formulated in terms of evolution in a single external time parameter.
- Premisecitation
In a model of gravity plus electromagnetic field, the explicitly constructed state p yields a thermal time that is precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time.
“In [ 1 I], the state p was explicitly constructed.Then, the thermal time corresponding to p was computed.The result turns out to be precisely the conventional Friedman-Robertson-Walker time, namely the flow that we identify as the true time flow in OUT universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Ashtekar A, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The notion of time in general relativity based on timelike directions and proper time along timelike world lines is state-dependent.
“Notice that this notion of time is state-dependent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The relation postulated in the classical context between a thermal state and a time flow is precisely the semiclassical analogue of the Tomita-Takesaki construction.
“The relation postulated in the classical context between a thermal state and a time flow is precisely the semiclassical analogue of the Tomita-Takesaki construction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The classical thermal time hypothesis can be extended to quantum field theory via the Tomita-Takesaki construction.
“It follows that on the one hand we can extend the classical thermal time hypothesis to the context of quantum field theory via the Tomita-Takesaki construction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Unruh and Hawking effects can be directly traced to the thermal time postulate.
“We show in section 4 that they can be directly traced to the thermal time postulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The cocycle Radon-Nikodym theorem shows that the modular group associated to a faithful normal state on a von Neumann algebra is independent, modulo inner automorphisms, of the choice of state.
“The co-cycle Radon-Nikodym theorem [12] shows that, given a von Neumann algebra M , the one-parameter group of automorphisms of M , which we denote ot E AutM, Vt E R, associated by the Tomita-Takesaki theorem [ 151 to a (faithful, normal) state 4 on M is independent, modulo inner automorphisms, of the choice of 4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Gibbs J W, 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [15] Connes A, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
In the general generally covariant case, one is led to postulate that the thermal time defines the physical time.
“In this general case, one is led to postulate that the thermal time af defines the physical time [41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Rovelli C, 1991, Phys. Rev. source
- Rests on an assumption: In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics cannot be formulated in terms of evolution in a single external time parameter.
- Interpretationnone given
The thermal time postulate reduces to the Hamilton equations of motion in the case in which the system is not generally covariant.
“this postulate reduces to the Hamilton equations of motion, in the case in which the system is not generally covariant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The general features of the time evolution may change substantially by focusing on different observables subalgebras.
“the general features of the time evolution may change substantially by focusing on different observables subalgebras, that is, by probing the theory in different regimest”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Applying the thermal time postulate to the Gibbs state gives a definition of physical time proportional to standard non-relativistic time.
“Thus, if we apply the thermal time postulate to the Gibbs state (27), we obtain a definition of physical time which is proportional to the standard non-relativistic time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The unitary group of transformations generated by K1 can be interpreted as the physical time characteristic of the observer O.
“This fact suggests that the unitary group of transformations (54) y , ~ = eiroK,Ae-iraK1 can be interpreted as the physical time characteristic of the observer 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
In the non-relativistic limit, physics is well described by small excitations of a quantum field theory around a thermal state |omega>.
“In the regime in which we may disregard the effect of the relativistic gravitational field, and thus the general covariance of the fundamental theory, physics is well described by small excitations of a quantum field theory around a thermal state Iw).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The Hamilton equations and the Gibbs postulate follow immediately from the modular flow relation (8).
“The Hamilton equations, and the Gibbs postulate follow immediately from the modular flow relation (8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since |omega> is a KMS state of the conventional Hamiltonian time evolution, the thermodynamical time defined by the modular flow of |omega> is precisely the physical time of non-relativistic physics.
“Since Io) is a KMS state of the conventional Hamiltonian time evolution, it follows that the thermodynamical time defined by the modular flow of lo) is precisely the physical time of non-relativistic physics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Whatever state one starts with, the modular flow projects down to the same one-parameter group of elements of the group of outer automorphisms Out A.
“Therefore, whatever state one starts with, the modular flow projects down to the same one-parameter group of elements of the group of outer automorphisms Out A.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In field theory, the fundamental description of the state of a field system is always incomplete and therefore intrinsically thermodynamical, because we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.
“Notice that in field theory we are always in such a thermodynamical context, because we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1. The modular group as time · plain
“The observation that a fundamental description of the state of a field system is always incomplete, and therefore intrinsically thermodynamical, in the sense above, is an important ingredient of the following discussion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In field theory, we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.
- Also stated in: § 3.1. The modular group as time · plain
- Interpretationcitation
In conventional field theories, the only consequence of the canonical outer flow is that one must choose the correct type of von Neumann algebra to start with, type III.
“In conventional field theories, where we are independently provided with a notion of time evolution, the only consequence of this observation is that we must be sure to choose the correct type of von Neumann algebra to start with (type I I I , as argued in [7], and elsewhere).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
- Interpretationown data
Gibbs states are the states for which the thermal time flow and the geometrical time flow are proportional.
“As we shall see in the examples of the following section, the Gibbs states are the states for which the two time flows are proportional.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An equilibrium quantum thermal state contains all the information on the dynamics contained in the Hamiltonian, except for the constant factor beta.
“Thus, as we noticed in the introduction in the context of classical mechanics, an equilibrium quantum thermal state contains all the information on the dynamics which is contained in the Hamiltonian (except for the constant factor j3, which depends on the unit of time employed).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a quantum generally covariant context, the physical time is determined by the thermal state of the system, as its modular flow.
“In a quantum generally covariant context, the physical time is determined by the thermal state of the system, as its modular flow (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a non-generally covariant theory, an equilibrium state is a state whose modular automorphism group is the time translation group, with time measured in units of beta/kbT.
“Therefore, in a non-generally covariant theory, an equilibrium state is a state whose modular automorphism group is the time translation group (where the time is measured in units of f i / k b T ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A von Neumann algebra is intrinsically a 'dynamical' object.
“In this sense, a von Neumann algebra is intrinsically a 'dynamical' object.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The classical limit of the thermal time hypothesis allows one to define a generally covariant statistical theory, and thus a theoretical framework for the statistical mechanics of the gravitational field.
“In 141 it is shown that the classical limit of the thermal time hypothesis allows one to define a generally covariant statistical theory, and thus a theoretical framework for the statistical mechanics of the gravitational field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The true statistical state of the universe that surrounds us and the factual flow of time are related precisely as requested by the thermal time postulate.
“Therefore, the true statistical state of the universe that surrounds us, and the factual flow of time are related precisely as requested by the thermal time postulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation can be modeled by a Robertson-Walker cosmological model.
- Premisecitation
Any faithful state is a KMS state with inverse temperature beta = 1 with respect to the modular automorphism it itself generates.
“Any faithful state is a K M s state (with inverse temperature p = 1) with respect to the modular automorphism at it itself generates 1141.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1141]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The derivation of the time flow via the modular group of A_R depends only on the trajectory of the observer, which determines A_R, and does not require any a priori choice of coordinates on the Rindler wedge.
“An important aspect of this derivation of the time flow via the modular group a, of the algebra AR is given by the fact that the result depends only on the trajectory of the observer (which determines AR). and does not require any a priori choice of coordinates on the Rindler wedge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Applying the thermal time hypothesis to a non-generally covariant system in thermal equilibrium recovers known physics.
“If we apply the thermal time hypothesis to a non-generally covariant system in thermal equilibrium, we recover immediately known physics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The thermal time of the system that the observer can reach is proportional to the time flow determined geometrically by its proper time.
“Therefore, the thermal time of the system that the observer can reach is proportional to the time flow determined geometrically by its proper time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Due to the co-cycle Radon-Nikodym theorem, the difference between two modular flows is always an inner automorphism.
“Due to the co-cycle Radon-Nikodym theorem, however, the difference between two modular flows is always an inner automorphism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Gibbs J W, 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The same state may give rise to different time flows when restricted to different subalgebras of the full observables algebra.
“Furthermore, as the Rindler example points out, the same state may give rise to different time flows when restricted to different subalgebras of the full observables algebra of the theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The canonical flow of outer automorphisms depends only on the algebra itself.
“This flow is canonical: it depends only on the algebra itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bisognano and Wichmann proved that the modular group of |0> over A_R is precisely alpha_t = gamma_{-2pi t}.
“Bisognano and Wicbmann [21] have proven that the modular group of 10) over d R is precisely at = Yzno-lt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Bergmann P G, 1956, Helv. Phys. Acta Suppl.
- Interpretationreasoning
If we knew the thermal state of the fields around us and the full kinematics, we could throw away the full standard model Lagrangian without loss of information.
“To put it dramatically, we could say that if we knew the thermal state of the fields around us (and we h e w the full kinematics, namely the specification of all the dynamical fields), we could then throw away the full standard model Lagrangian without loss of information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The universe around us is in a state of non-zero temperature.
- Interpretationreasoning
Applying the thermal time postulate to a thermal state in a special relativistic system singles out a preferred time, which is the Lorentz time of the Lorentz frame in which the thermal bath is at rest.
“If we apply the postulate to such a state, we single out a preferred time, and it is easy to see that this time is the Lorentz time of the Lorentz frame in which the thermal bath is at rest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 14
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThe state-independent characterization of time is given by the cocycle Radon-Nikodym theorem: thermal time is unique up to inner automorphisms.
“The stateindependent characterization of time is then given by the co-cycle Radon-Nikodym theorem: thermal time is unique up to inner automorphisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Gibbs J W, 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenIn general relativity no selection of an internal time is known that leads to a well-defined fully non-parametrized dynamical system.
“The first difficulty is that in general relativity no selection of an internal time is known, which leads to a well defined fully non-parametrized dynamical system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenThe quantum evolution generated by an arbitrary internal time lacks unitarity.
“Second, because the corresponding quantum evolution lacks unitarily, and the problem is open whether this fact jeopardizes the consistency of the interpretation of the quantum formalism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenIf a generally covariant system has a very large number of degrees of freedom and we describe our best experimental knowledge of its state as a distribution on its state space, then the flow determined by this distribution coincides with what we perceive as the physical flow of time.
“if we have a generally covariant system with a very large number of degrees of freedom (say, the universe including the gravitational field), and we describe our best experimental knowledge of its state as a distribution on its state space, then theflow determined by this distribution coincides precisely with what we perceive as the physical flow of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningIn the canonical formulation of a generally covariant theory, there is no Hamiltonian defined on the phase space, but the smooth functions on the phase space contain dynamical information implicitly.
“In the canonical formulation of a generally covariant theory, therefore, there is no Hamiltonian defined on the phase space, but the phase space is a highly nontrivial object, and the smooth functions on the phase space, namely the generally covariant observables, contain dynamical information implicitly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenIn a generally covariant quantum field theory, the physical time is the modular flow of the thermal state.
“We extend the thermal time assumption to the quantum theory, by postulating that: the physical time is the modular flow of the thermal state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationNon-commutative von Neumann algebras are dynamical objects and inherit a natural time evolution from their non-commutativity.
“it means that the non-commutative (von Neumann) algebras are dynamical objects and inherit a natural time evolution from their non-commutativity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Rovelli C, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenThere is intrinsically no way of constructing a physical clock that is not affected by the gravitational field.
“There is intrinsically no way of constructing a physical clock that is not atfected by the gravitational field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Tomita-Takesaki theorem associates to a faithful normal state on a von Neumann algebra a one-parameter group of modular automorphisms of the algebra.
“The Tomita-Takesaki theorem [15] states that the map 01, defined by”
- Also stated in: § 2.1. Modular automorphism · plain
“leaves R globally invariant and hence defines a one-parameter group of automorphisms of the algebra R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Connes A, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 2.1. Modular automorphism · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe Hamilton equations and the Gibbs postulate are both contained in the Tomita-Takesaki relation (8).
“The Hamilton equations (49) and the Gibbs postulate (SO), are both contained in the Tomita-Takesaki relation (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningIn a generally covariant quantum context, the algebra itself determines the allowed time flows, providing a possibility of capturing an abstract fully state-independent notion of time evolution.
“However, in a generally covariant quantum context this observation provides us with the possibility of capturing an abstract fully state-independent notion of time evolution.In fact, it is the algebra itself that determines the allowed time flows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe fact that time is determined by the state, and therefore the system is always in an equilibrium state with respect to the thermal time flow, does not imply that evolution is frozen or that we cannot detect any dynamical change.
“The fact that the time is determined by the state, adtherefore the system is always in an equilibrium state with respect to the thermal time flow, does not imply that evolution is frozen, and we cannot detect any dynamical change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTemperature is interpreted as the ratio between thermal time and geometrical time, defined only when geometrical time is meaningful.
“Thus, within the present scheme the temperature is interpreted as the ratio between thermal time and geometrical time, defined only when the second is meaningfult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningIn the classical limit, there is a classical Hamiltonian H that generates the Hamilton evolution, and the state p is related to this Hamiltonian by the Gibbs relation.
“Thus we obtain the result that there is a classical Hamiltonian H that generates the Hamilton evolution, and that the state p is related to this Hamiltonian by the Gibbs relation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenIn a quantum system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, what we generally measure is the effect of small perturbations around a thermal state.
“In a quantum system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, what we generally measure is the effect of small perturbations around a thermal state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningPhysical time has a thermodynamical origin.
“The hypothesis that we have put forward in this paper is that physical time has a thermodynamical origin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationFollowing Unruh's initial suggestion, the construction can be generalized to the Schwarzschild solution; an observer at rest in Schwarzschild coordinates undergoes constant acceleration away from the black hole, and the result allows one to derive the Hawking temperature.
“Following Unruh's initial suggestion [5], this construction can be immediately generalized to the Schwarzschild solution-an observer at rest in the Schwarzschild coordinates undergoes a constant acceleration pointing away from the black hol e. -and the result allows one to derive the Hawking temperature [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenIn general, the modular flow is not an inner automorphism of the algebra; there is no Hamiltonian in R that generates it.
“In general, the modular flow is not an inner automorphism of the algebra, namely, there is no Hamiltonian in R that generates it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe physical time depends on the state; when the system is in a state omega, the physical time is given by the modular group alpha_t^omega of omega.
“The physical time depends on the state.When the system is in a state o, the physical time is given by the modular group a( of o.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In a generally covariant theory, notions of time tend to be state dependent.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningWhile different states over a von Neumann algebra define distinct time flows, it is possible to define a state-independent flow.
“As shown in section 2, while different states over a von Neumann algebra R define distinct time flows, still it is possible to define a state-independent flow, in the following sense.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThese relations hold in general for a generally covariant theory; however, the Hamiltonian H does not determine the Gibbs state, but rather is determined by any thermal state.
“These relations hold, in general, for a generally covariant theory; however, we recall that the Hamiltonian H plays a quite different role than in a non-relativistic theory: it does not determine the Gibbs state, but, rather, it is determined by any thermal state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenIn a generally covariant situation, the thermal time is the only definition of time available.
“In a generally covariant situation, the thermal time is the only definition of time available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenGeneral covariance implies that the Hamiltonian vanishes weakly.
“General covariance implies that the Hamiltonian vanishes weakly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIn conventional quantum field theory, all information can be extracted in terms of vacuum expectation values of products of field operators, i.e. by means of a single quantum state |0>.
“In conventional quantum field theory we can extract all the information in terms of vacuum expectation values of products of fields operators, namely by means of a single quantum state IO).This was emphasized by Wight”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wight
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe restriction of the observables algebra to the Rindler wedge determines a time flow; similarly the restriction to a different fixed region of spacetime defines a corresponding time flow.
“For instance, as the restriction of the observables algebra to the Rindler wedge determines a time flow, similarly the restriction to a different fixed region of spacetime defines a corresponding time flow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn a special relativistic system, a thermal state breaks Lorentz invariance; the average momentum of a gas at finite temperature defines a preferred Lorentz frame.
“In a special relativistic system, a thermal state breaks Lorentz invariance.For instance, the average momentum of a gas at finite temperature defines a preferred Lorentz frame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Ill]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe notion of a preferred 'flowing' time has no mechanical meaning at the quantum generally covariant level, but rather has a thermodynamical origin.
“The hypothesis that we explore in this paper is that the notion of a preferred 'flowing' time has no mechanical meaning at the quantum generally covariant level, but rather has a thermodynamical origin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
A generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.
“We simply assume that a generally covariant quantum theory can be consistently defined.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ensemble of quantum observables form a non-Abelian C*-algebra.
“We assume that the ensemble of the quantum observables form a non-Abelian C-algebra, which we denote as A.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The quantum algebra A is a deformation of (a subalgebra of) the classical Poisson algebra.
“assume that the quantum algebra A is a deformation of (a subalgebra of) the classical Poisson algebra.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics cannot be formulated in terms of evolution in a single external time parameter.
“In a generally covariant theory there is no preferred time flow, and the dynamics of the theory cannot be formulated in terms of an evolution in a single external time parameter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the presence of thermal or quantum superpositions of geometries, the spacetime causal structure is lost.
“because in the presence of thermal or quantum 'superpositions' of geometries the spacetime causal structure is lost.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The universe around us is in a state of non-zero temperature.
“If we take into account the fact that the universe around us is in a state of non-zero temperature, this means that the information about the dynamics can be fully replaced by the information about the thermal state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In field theory, we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.
“Notice that in field theory we are always in such a thermodynamical context, because we cannot perform infinite measurements with infinite precision.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a generally covariant theory, notions of time tend to be state dependent.
“The set of considerations above, and, in particular, the observation that in a generally covariant theory notions of time tend to be state dependent, lead us to make the following hypothesis.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation can be modeled by a Robertson-Walker cosmological model.
“let us model the physical universe and the observed cosmic background radiation by means of a Robertson-Walker cosmological model filled”
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
Notes on black-hole evaporation
Unruh, W. G. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.870 · Cited by 4,850
On the equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics
Haag, R., Hugenholtz, N. M., & Winnink, M. (1967) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01646342 · Cited by 763
On the duality condition for a Hermitian scalar field
Bisognano, J. J., & Wichmann, E. H. (1975) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.522605 · Cited by 648
On the duality condition for quantum fields
Bisognano, J. J., & Wichmann, E. H. (1976) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.522898 · Cited by 642
Une classification des facteurs de type ${\rm III}$
Connes, A. (1973) · Annales scientifiques de l'École normale supérieure · doi:10.24033/asens.1247 · Cited by 553
What is observable in classical and quantum gravity?
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/2/011 · Cited by 449
Self-citationTime in quantum gravity: An hypothesis
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 · Cited by 445
Self-citationQuantum mechanics without time: A model
Rovelli, C. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2638 · Cited by 316
Self-citationRovelli, C. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/2/012 · Cited by 250
Self-citationStatistical mechanics of gravity and the thermodynamical origin of time
Rovelli, C. (1993) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/8/015 · Cited by 127
Self-citationThe statistical state of the universe
Rovelli, C. (1993) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/8/016 · Cited by 49
Self-citationTolman, R. C. (1933) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.77.1995.291
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bergmann P G, 1956, Helv. Phys. Acta Suppl., 4, 79
- Rovelli C, 1994, Nuovo Cimento
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365
“the thermodynamics of the gravitational field[ 39 ].”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852
(1998) · doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-1 · Cited by 917
Self-citationBlack Hole Entropy from Loop Quantum Gravity
Rovelli, C. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3288 · Cited by 660
Self-citationQuantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom
Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, J., Marolf, D., Mourão, J., & Thiemann, T. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531252 · Cited by 528
(1995) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 412
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2006) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55420-4_10 · Cited by 504
Self-citationBulk locality from modular flow
Faulkner, T., & Lewkowycz, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2017)151 · Cited by 217
Space from Hilbert space: Recovering geometry from bulk entanglement
Cao, C., Carroll, S. M., & Michalakis, S. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.024031 · Cited by 218
“Alternatively, by working with mixed states one could adopt the thermal time hypothesis [65] and generate state-dependent time flow purely from the modular”
BackgroundZloshchastiev, K. G. (2010) · Gravitation and Cosmology · doi:10.1134/s0202289310040067 · Cited by 211
On revolutionizing quantum field theory with Tomita’s modular theory
Borchers, H. J. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.533323 · Cited by 203
Reduced density matrix and internal dynamics for multicomponent regions
Casini, H., & Huerta, M. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/18/185005 · Cited by 173
Entanglement and the thermodynamic arrow of time
Jennings, D. H., & Rudolph, T. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.061130 · Cited by 129
Diamond's temperature: Unruh effect for bounded trajectories and thermal time hypothesis
Martinetti, P., & Rovelli, C. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/22/015 · Cited by 109
Self-citationReconstruction of Quantum Theory
Grinbaum, A. (2007) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axm028 · Cited by 109
Thermal time and Tolman–Ehrenfest effect: ‘temperature as the speed of time’
Carlo Rovelli, C., & Smerlak, M. (2011) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/7/075007 · Cited by 99
Self-citationGeneralized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity
Jensen, K., Sorce, J., & Speranza, A. J. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)020 · Cited by 151
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2011) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9561-4 · Cited by 99
Self-citationRovelli, C. (2007) · Philosophy of Physics · doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50015-4 · Cited by 86
Self-citationMad-Dog Everettianism: Quantum Mechanics at Its Most Minimal
Carroll, S. M., & Singh, A. (2019) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11301-8_10 · Cited by 86
The Unruh effect for philosophers
Earman, J. (2011) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.04.001 · Cited by 73
The Chern-Simons invariant as the natural time variable for classical and quantum cosmology
Smolin, L., & Soo, C. P. (1994) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 65
Black Hole Thermodynamics and Lorentz Symmetry
Ted Jacobson, A., & Wall, A. C. (2010) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9423-5 · Cited by 63
The Chern-Simons invariant as the natural time variable for classical and quantum cosmology
Smolin, L., & Soo, C. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00222-e · Cited by 90
“different reasons, Connes and Rovelli have found independent reasons to conjecture that general states of quantum gravity satisfy a KMS condition[30].”
BackgroundFrom Time-Reversal Symmetry to Quantum Bayes’ Rules
Parzygnat, A. J., & Fullwood, J. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020334 · Cited by 51
Dynamical Locality and Covariance: What Makes a Physical Theory the Same in all Spacetimes?
Fewster, C. J., & Verch, R. (2012) · Annales Henri Poincaré · doi:10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0 · Cited by 92
“is of interest as the modular objects also encode dynamical information [30], and in some works, this dynamical information has been related to concepts of locality and covariance [17, 10, 15, 14].”
Spacetime thermodynamics without hidden degrees of freedom
Chirco, G., Haggard, H. M., Riello, A., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044044 · Cited by 52
Self-citationGeneral relativistic statistical mechanics
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.084055 · Cited by 49
Self-citationTime-consciousness in computational phenomenology: a temporal analysis of active inference
Bogotá, J. D., & Djebbara, Z. (2023) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niad004 · Cited by 44
Emergent spacetime and the origin of gravity
Yang, H. S. (2009) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/012 · Cited by 59
Geometric Modular Action for Disjoint Intervals and Boundary Conformal Field Theory
Longo, R., Martinetti, P., & Rehren, K.-H. (2009) · Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) · Cited by 45
GEOMETRIC MODULAR ACTION FOR DISJOINT INTERVALS AND BOUNDARY CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY
LONGO, R., MARTINETTI, P., & REHREN, K.-H. (2010) · Reviews in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1142/s0129055x10003977 · Cited by 42
Geometric temperature and entropy of quantum isolated horizons
Pranzetti, D. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.104046 · Cited by 42
Noncommutative model with spontaneous time generation and Planckian bound
Majid, S. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2084748 · Cited by 39
“The model is complementary to our previous bicrossproduct one.”
ResultThe century of the incomplete revolution: Searching for general relativistic quantum field theory
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.533327 · Cited by 66
Self-citationInside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience
Jafferis, D. L., & Lamprou, L. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)084 · Cited by 40
ELEMENTS OF INFORMATION-THEORETIC DERIVATION OF THE FORMALISM OF QUANTUM THEORY
Grinbaum, A. (2003) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749903000309 · Cited by 42
Outline of a generally covariant quantum field theory and a quantum theory of gravity
Rovelli, C. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531255 · Cited by 37
Self-citationField theories on deformed spaces
Wulkenhaar, R. (2005) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2005.04.019 · Cited by 35
From configuration to dynamics: Emergence of Lorentz signature in classical field theory
Shinji Mukohyama, A., & Uzan, J. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.065020 · Cited by 40
Inside out: meet the operators inside the horizon. On bulk reconstruction behind causal horizons
Almheiri, A., Anous, T., & Lewkowycz, A. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)028 · Cited by 35
Groupoid approach to noncommutative quantization of gravity
Heller, M. C., Sasin, W., & Lambert, D. (1997) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532186 · Cited by 33
“In the noncommutative context there is no obvious counterpart of the local time concept, and it is precisely von Neumann algebra that can be regarded as implementing the abstract idea of dynamics (see also [2]).”
Backgroundκ -Poincaré invariant quantum field theories with Kubo-Martin-Schwinger weight
Poulain, T., & Wallet, J.-C. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.025002 · Cited by 40
An Introduction to Algebraic Quantum Field Theory
Fredenhagen, K. (2015) · Mathematical physics studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21353-8_1 · Cited by 33
Today’s ecological relevance of Bergson-Einstein debate on time
Longo, G. O. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110753707-020 · Cited by 32
Statistical equilibrium in quantum gravity: Gibbs states in group field theory
Kotecha, I., & Oriti, D. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aacbbd · Cited by 33
Comment on the Bekenstein bound
Longo, R., & Xu, F. (2018) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2018.03.004 · Cited by 32
Death and resurrection of the zeroth principle of thermodynamics
Haggard, H. M., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.084001 · Cited by 34
Self-citationSystem-time entanglement in a discrete-time model
Boette, A., Rossignoli, R., Gigena, N., & Cerezo, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.062127 · Cited by 35
A covariant action principle for dissipative fluid dynamics: from formalism to fundamental physics
Andersson, N., & Comer, G. L. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/075008 · Cited by 41
Gauge theories on quantum spaces
Hersent, K., Mathieu, P., & Wallet, J.-C. (2023) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.03.002 · Cited by 29
Statistical equilibrium of tetrahedra from maximum entropy principle
Chirco, G., Kotecha, I., & Oriti, D. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.086011 · Cited by 28
Complementarity of Mind and Matter
Primas, H. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_9 · Cited by 29
Multiple-event probability in general-relativistic quantum mechanics
Hellmann, F., Mondragón, M., Pérez, A., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2007) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.084033 · Cited by 28
Self-citationTrace dynamics and division algebras: towards quantum gravity and unification
Singh, T. P. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A · doi:10.1515/zna-2020-0255 · Cited by 22
Ideal clocks—a convenient fiction
Lorek, K., Louko, J., & Dragan, A. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/17/175003 · Cited by 28
Single particle in quantum gravity and Braunstein-Ghosh-Severini entropy of a spin network
Carlo Rovelli, C., & Vidotto, F. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.044038 · Cited by 25
Self-citationGeometry of color perception. Part 2: perceived colors from real quantum states and Hering’s rebit
Berthier, M. (2020) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s13408-020-00092-x · Cited by 25
κ-Poincaré invariant orientable field theories at one-loop
Poulain, T., & Wallet, J.-C. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)064 · Cited by 26
On de Sitter spacetime and string theory
Berglund, P., Hübsch, T., & Minić, D. (2023) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271823300021 · Cited by 25
Gauge theories on κ-Minkowski spaces: twist and modular operators
Mathieu, P., & Wallet, J.-C. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)112 · Cited by 28
A spectral quadruple for de Sitter space
Kopf, T., & Paschke, M. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1420744 · Cited by 24
Quantum null geometry and gravity
Ciambelli, L., Freidel, L., & Leigh, R. G. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)028 · Cited by 35
Quantum field theory and coalgebraic logic in theoretical computer science
Basti, G., Capolupo, A., & Vitiello, G. (2017) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.04.006 · Cited by 22
Noncommutative Dynamics of Random Operators
Heller, M. C., Pysiak, L., & Sasin, W. (2005) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-005-3992-7 · Cited by 22
Statistical mechanics of generally covariant quantum theories: a Boltzmann-like approach
(2001) · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/3/314 · Cited by 22
Self-citationStatistical and entanglement entropy for black holes in quantum geometry
Pérez, A. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.084015 · Cited by 21
Coupling and thermal equilibrium in general-covariant systems
Chirco, G., Haggard, H. M., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.084027 · Cited by 22
Self-citationCONFORMAL MAPPING OF UNRUH TEMPERATURE
Martinetti, P. (2009) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732309030874 · Cited by 21
Statistical mechanics of generally covariant quantum theories: A Boltzmann-like approach
(2001) · Cited by 20
Self-citationOn Landauer’s Principle and Bound for Infinite Systems
Longo, R. (2018) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-018-3116-x · Cited by 28
“One may read our present paper also in relation with the intrinsic, modular interpretation of time proposed by Connes and Rovelli in [10].”
BackgroundSu, D., & Ralph, T. C. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.044023 · Cited by 19
Statistical mechanics of reparametrization-invariant systems. It takes three to tango.
Chirco, G., Josset, T., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/4/045005 · Cited by 20
Self-citationSmooth Quantum Gravity: Exotic Smoothness and Quantum Gravity
Aßelmeyer-Maluga, T. (2016) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31299-6_15 · Cited by 19
Heller, M. C., & Sasin, W. (1998) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(98)00824-x · Cited by 20
“To define the modular group αt, Connes and Rovelli [7] have distinguished the state on A of the form ω(a) = Tr[aω] for every a ∈ A (which, in the language used by physicists is a density matrix).”
BackgroundInfluentialEmergent quantum mechanics as a thermal ensemble
de Córdoba, P. F., Isidro, J. M., & Perea, M. H. (2014) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887814500686 · Cited by 16
Origin of Classical Singularities
Heller, M. C., & Sasin, W. (1999) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1023/a:1026650424098 · Cited by 17
Generating multi-partite entanglement from the quantum vacuum with a finite-lifetime mirror
Foo, J., Onoe, S., Zych, M., et al. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aba1b2 · Cited by 16
Thermodynamical path integral and emergent symmetry
Sasa, S., Sugiura, S., & Yokokura, Y. (2019) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.022109 · Cited by 16
Causal Paradoxes: A Conflict Between Relativity and the Arrow of Time
Nikolić, H. (2006) · Foundations of Physics Letters · doi:10.1007/s10702-006-0516-5 · Cited by 16
Modular Theory, Non-Commutative Geometry and Quantum Gravity
Bertozzini, P. (2010) · Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications · doi:10.3842/sigma.2010.067 · Cited by 20
On spectral triples in quantum gravity: I
Aastrup, J., Grimstrup, J. M., & Nest, R. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/6/065011 · Cited by 35
WHAT KIND OF NONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY FOR QUANTUM GRAVITY?
Martinetti, P. (2005) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732305017780 · Cited by 15
Entanglement degradation in causal diamonds
Camblong, H. E., Chakraborty, A., Lopez-Duque, P., & Ordóñez, C. R. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.105003 · Cited by 20
Singh, T. P. (2022) · Physics · doi:10.3390/physics4030063 · Cited by 14
Beyond the Standard Model with noncommutative geometry, strolling towards quantum gravity
Martinetti, P. (2015) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/634/1/012001 · Cited by 14
Kotecha, I. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 13
Intersecting Quantum Gravity with Noncommutative Geometry - a Review
Johannes Aastrup, A. (2012) · Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications · doi:10.3842/sigma.2012.018 · Cited by 19
Quantum space, quantum time, and relativistic quantum mechanics
Singh, A. (2021) · Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-021-00255-9 · Cited by 15
Kotecha, I. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5080187 · Cited by 15
On the Principle of Synchronization
Schlatter, A. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20100741 · Cited by 11
C *-algebras of holonomy-diffeomorphisms and quantum gravity: I
Aastrup, J., & Grimstrup, J. M. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/8/085016 · Cited by 12
Conceptual Unification of Gravity and Quanta
Heller, M., Pysiak, L., & Sasin, W. (2007) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-007-9364-8 · Cited by 12
Causal paradoxes: A conflict between relativity and the arrow of timePreprint
Nikolić, H. (2006) · Cited by 12
Dark energy as a large scale quantum gravitational phenomenon
Singh, T. P. (2020) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732320501953 · Cited by 11
In search of relativistic time
Lachièze-Rey, M. (2014) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.01.001 · Cited by 11
Algebraic Approach to Quantum Gravity III: Non-Commmutative Riemannian Geometry
(2007) · doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7978-0_5 · Cited by 11
“Note that this is unrelated to ‘time’ defined as the modular automorphism group of a von-Neuman algebra with respect to a suitable state[CR].”
Cold Dark Matter: A Gluonic Bose--Einstein Condensate in Anti-de Sitter Space TimePreprint
Cohen-Tannoudji, G., & Gazeau, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3390/universe7110402 · Cited by 10
Conceptual Unification of Gravity and Quanta
Heller, M., Pysiak, L., & Sasin, W. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Connes, A., & Rovelli, C.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2899-2917
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W1994766604
- Semantic Scholar
- 86df4cc3e26ad368152d50b8123af98ead2a5030
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9311465)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- von Neumann algebras, thermal time hypothesis, passage of time, timelessness, Unruh temperature, Hawking radiation, one-parameter groups of automorphisms, outer automorphisms, algebraic quantum field theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review