Cited by 36Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Dark matter gravitational interactions

Open access
Tucker, Robin W, Wang, Charles·1998·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We argue that the conjectured dark matter in the Universe may be endowed with a new kind of gravitational charge that couples via a short-range gravitational interaction mediated by a massive vector field. A model is constructed that assimilates this concept into ideas of current inflationary cosmology. The model is also consistent with the observed behaviour of galactic rotation curves according to Newtonian dynamics. The essential idea is that stars composed of ordinary (as opposed to dark) matter experience Newtonian forces due to the presence of an all-pervading background of massive gravitationally charged cold dark matter. The novel gravitational interactions are predicted to have a significant influence on pre-inflationary cosmology. The precise details depend on the nature of a gravitational Proca interaction and the description of matter. A gravitational Proca field configuration that gives rise to attractive forces between dark matter charges of like polarity exhibits homogeneous isotropic eternal cosmologies that are free of cosmological curvature singularities thus eliminating the horizon problem associated with the standard big-bang scenario. Such solutions do, however, admit dense hot pre-inflationary epochs each with a characteristic scale factor that may be correlated with the dark matter density in the current era of expansion. The model is based on a theory in which a modification of Einsteinian gravity at very short distances can be expressed in terms of the gradient of the Einstein metric and the torsion of a non-Riemannian connection on the bundle of linear frames over spacetime. Indeed, we demonstrate that the genesis of the model resides in a remarkable simplification that occurs when one analyses the variational equations associated with a broad class of non-Riemannian actions.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes that dark matter carries a new gravitational charge coupling through a short-range massive vector (Proca) field, derived from a class of non-Riemannian gravitational actions that reduce to an Einstein-Proca-fluid system. It argues this can reconcile galactic rotation curves with Newtonian dynamics and, for attractive like-polarity Proca charges, yield non-singular eternal pre-inflationary cosmologies.

Key findings

  • The non-Riemannian action reduces to a Levi-Civita Einstein-Proca system: the Proca equation \(d{*}dQ+\beta_3 Q=0\) and Einstein equation \(\mathrm{Ein}^\bullet+\ell g+\kappa\tau=0\), with the new gravitational interaction mediated by a massive vector field.
  • For dark matter with Proca charge, the asymptotic rotation speed is \(v_c \approx \sqrt{2k_BT/\mu_q}\), giving \(\rho_q(r)\approx v_c^2/(4\pi G r^2)\); with \(v_c\approx 220\ \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}\), this yields \(\rho_q(r)\approx 6\times10^{-28}\ \mathrm{kg\,m^{-3}}\) at \(r=10\ \mathrm{kpc}\), and for \(T=2.7\ \mathrm{K}\), \(\mu_q\approx 1.5\times10^{-23}\ \mathrm{kg}\) or \(\mu_q c^2\approx 10\ \mathrm{GeV}\).
  • For \(\sigma=+1\) (attractive forces between like Proca charges), homogeneous isotropic cosmologies have a non-zero minimum scale factor and are free of curvature singularities, eliminating the horizon problem; for \(\sigma=-1\), solutions exhibit zeros and singular behaviour like standard Friedmann models.
  • With \(q\approx \ell_{\rm pl}\) and \(m_\alpha\approx m_{\rm pl}\), the dimensionless coupling \(q^2/(\hbar c)=1/(32\pi^2)\approx 1/315\), and the required inflationary e-folding is \(>20\) with \(S_{\min}>10\ \mathrm{cm}\), smaller than the traditional \(>60\) e-folding.

Methods

  • Constructs an action principle for non-Riemannian geometry with metric, connection, and matter fields, then shows a broad class of such actions simplifies to an Einstein-Proca system with a Proca-type vector field.
  • Develops an Einstein-Proca-fluid model where ordinary matter has zero Proca charge and dark matter has non-zero Proca charge \(q\); derives field equations, conservation laws, Lorentz-type forces, and a Yukawa potential \(V(r)=-\sigma c^4 q^2 e^{-(c m_\alpha/\hbar)r}/(32\pi^2 G r)\).
  • Analyzes galactic dynamics via a Lane-Emden equation for a self-gravitating dark matter gas and cosmological Robertson-Walker models, comparing both signs of the Proca coupling and inflationary parameters.

Limitations

  • The paper states that for \(\sigma=+1\), interpreting the Proca stress as matter stress would be “unphysical” and might lead to stability problems analogous to fermionic stresses without quantization; it does not discard this case because of its cosmological consequences.
  • It also notes that if \(m_\alpha\) is less than the Planck mass, then \(|q|<2\times10^{-92}\ \mathrm{m}\), much smaller than the Planck length and “somewhat unnatural.”
  • Evident from the text: confrontation with observation is limited to galactic rotation curves and inflationary cosmology, with assumptions of cold, low-pressure, spherically distributed dark matter and stars treated as test particles.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/015

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 4 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    The non-Riemannian Einstein tensor is not, in general, divergenceless.

    “Unlike the Einstein tensor associated with the Levi-Civita connection, the Einstein tensor Ein (defined in (2.3)) is associated with the non-Riemannian connection ∇ and is not, in general, divergenceless [23]:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Tucker R W, 1996 source
  • Findingreasoning

    The exterior derivative of both sides of equation (4.5) yields (cmα/h)^2 d*α + σ djq = 0.

    “while the exterior derivative of both sides of (4.5) yields cm α h 2 d α + σ dj q = 0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Proca charged particles are conserved: d(nq Vq)=0, equivalently djq=0.
  • Findingreasoning

    In the domain Y(x)<4^{1/3} θ^{1/3}, Y(x) has an acceleration phase (∂2Y/∂x2>0, qd<0).

    “We also show that in the domain Y (x) < 4 1/3 ϑ 1/3 , Y (x) has an acceleration phase (∂ 2 Y/∂x 2 > 0, q d < 0 obtained by differentiating (7.7)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The vanishing of the transverse components yields relativistic Navier-Stokes-type equations for neutral and charged fluids, respectively.

    “while the vanishing of the transverse components yields the appropriate relativistic Navier-Stoke's-type equations for neutral and charged fluids, respectively,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Taking the typical observational value vc≈220 km s^-1, equation (5.12) gives ρq(r)≈6×10^-28 kg m^-3 for r=10 kpc.

    “Taking a typical observational value [33] v c ≈ 220 km s -1 equation (5.12) gives a value ρ q (r) ≈ 6 × 10 -28 kg m -3 of the dark matter density for r = 10 kpc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Peebles P J E, 1993 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    With the ansatz α=A dt, F=dα=0, and the Proca field equation gives A=σ q nq h^2/(c^2 mα^2).

    “It follows that F = dα = 0 and the Proca field equation d F + cm α h 2 α + σ j q = 0(6.3) gives A = σ qn q h2 c 2 m 2 α . (6.4)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Proca 1-form is taken as α=A dt, with A=A(t).
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The Einstein-Proca-matter system equation is Ein• + σ = 8πG/c^4 (T0 + Tq).

    “Ein • + σ = 8πG c 4 (T 0 + T q ) (4.1)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Ordinary matter has zero coupling to the Proca field.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Dark matter has a non-zero coupling to the Proca field.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Both ordinary and dark matter are modeled as fluids with standard stress tensors T0 and Tq.
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The Einstein equation (4.1) yields the differential equations (6.6) and (6.7).

    “The Einstein equation (4.1) yields the differential equations ∂S ∂t 2 - 8πG 3 (ρ -ζ α )S 2 + c 2 k = 0 (6.6) and 3 ∂ 2 S ∂t 2 + 4(ρ + 3P -4ζ α ) = 0 (6.7)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Both neutral and Proca charged fluids have the common velocity V0=Vq=(1/c)∂/∂t to a first approximation.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Each fluid maintains the same entropy, so s0 and sq are constants.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    (Pq/c^2)/ρq = kBT/(μq c^2), and the low-pressure condition is satisfied if kBT≪μq c^2 (cold dark matter).

    “Thus (P q /c 2 )/ρ q = k B T /µ q c 2 and so the low-pressure condition is satisfied if k B T µ q c 2 (cold dark matter).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Differentiating (6.6) and using (6.7), the Proca modified Einstein equations yield ρ=ρv and equation (8.5).

    “so by differentiating (6.6) and using ( 6.7) the Proca modified Einstein equations yields ρ = 8πG = ρ v (8.4) and ∂S ∂t 2 -3 S 2 + 8πG 3 S 4 + c 2 k = 0 (8.5)where the constant is the 'effective cosmological constant'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: During the pure inflation phase the equation of state is P=-c^2 ρ.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    If matter is minimally coupled to the Weyl form Q, the action F contains a term Q∧j, equation (2.23) contains an extra source term proportional to j, and equation (2.26) contains an additional stress tensor from the variation of the matter action.

    “For example, if the matter is minimally coupled to the Weyl form Q, the action F will contain a term Q ∧ j where the 3-form j is the Proca charged matter current.Then (2.23) will contain an extra source term proportional to j, while (2.26) will contain an addition stress tensor from the variation of the matter action with respect to the metric tensor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Hence ρ0=M0/S^3 and ρq=Mq/S^3.

    “Hence from (7.1) and (6.5) one has ρ 0 = M 0 S 3 (7.2) ρ q = M q S 3(7.3)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    In the case q≈lpl and mα≈mpl, the dimensionless coupling strength between two Proca charges is Nq=Mq/μq≈1 and q^2/(hc)=1/(32π^2)≈1/315, which is of the order of the fine-structure constant.

    “In this case the dimensionless coupling strength between two Proca charges is N q = M q µ q ≈1 q2 hc = 1 32π 2 ≈ 1 315 (8.13) which is of the order of the fine-structure constant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The necessary parameters are estimated by requiring q≈ℓpl and mα≈mpl.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    With log(Sr/Smin)>60, Smin<10^-25 m, and (8.6) implies Λ<5×10^-73 kg m^-3 for k=0,1,-1.

    “Thus with log (S r /S min ) > 60 S min ≡ S(t i ) < 10 -25 m (8.7) and (8.6) implies that < 5 × 10 -73 kg m 3 (8.8) for k = 0, 1, -1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    For vc≈220 km s^-1, equation (5.11) implies μq≈1.5×10^-23 kg, or μq c^2≈10 GeV.

    “For v c ≈ 220 km s -1 equation (5.11) implies that µ q ≈ 1.5 × 10 -23 kg (5.13) or µ q c 2 ≈ 10 GeV.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The dark matter temperature now is no hotter than T=2.7 K.
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The genesis of the model resides in a remarkable simplification that occurs when one analyses the variational equations associated with a broad class of non-Riemannian actions.

    “Indeed, we demonstrate that the genesis of the model resides in a remarkable simplification that occurs when one analyses the variational equations associated with a broad class of non-Riemannian actions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For non-zero Ymin, the scale factor never vanishes and the geometry is non-singular.

    “For Y min non-zero the scale factor never vanishes and the geometry is non-singular.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Particles carrying the same sign of Proca charge attract or repel each other according as σ=+1 or σ=-1, respectively, with a force range h/(cmα).

    “Particles carrying the same sign of Proca charge attract or repel each other accordingly as σ = +1 or -1, respectively, with a force of range h/cm α .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    With σ=+1 an interpretation of σ as a stress tensor for matter would be unphysical.

    “With σ = +1 an interpretation of σ as a stress tensor for matter would be 'unphysical'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The model is based on equation (2.26) with l=0 and the right-hand side replaced by the stress tensors for fluid matter.

    “The model is based on (2.26) in section 2 with ℓ = 0 and the right-hand side replaced by the stress tensors for fluid matter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Both ordinary and dark matter are modeled as fluids with standard stress tensors T0 and Tq.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the model with Proca fields there need be no such singularity, and one may adjust the size of the minimum scale factor to accommodate the flatness problem with a smaller e-folding.

    “However, in the model with Proca fields there need be no such singularity and one may adjust the size of the minimum scale factor to accommodate the flatness problem with a smaller .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The coupling of dark matter to the Proca component of gravitation is defined by a new kind of conserved charge whose value can be correlated with the mass of the Proca quantum and the behaviour of the scale factor of the Universe.

    “The coupling of the dark matter to the Proca component of gravitation is defined by a new kind of conserved charge, the value of which can be correlated with the 'mass' of the Proca quantum and the behaviour of the scale factor of the Universe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    For radii beyond the visible galaxy, observations indicate that the squared circular speed is constant or that the enclosed mass grows linearly with radius, requiring a matter density distribution proportional to inverse square radius.

    “For r > r 0 , indications are (e.g. from H α emission) that v 2 (r) = k for some constant k, or M(r) ∼ r requiring a matter density distribution ρ(r) of the form ρ(r) ∼ 1/r 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This corresponds to log(Sr/Smin)>20, which is a considerably smaller bound than the traditional inflationary expansion based on Einsteinian gravitation alone.

    “This corresponds to = log (S r /S min ) > 20 which is a considerably smaller bound than the traditional inflationary expansion based on Einsteinian gravitation alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The proposed interaction may modify the inflationary period needed to address the flatness problem and may put the horizon problem into a new perspective.

    “As such it may modify the inflationary period needed to address the socalled 'flatness problem' and may put the so-called 'horizon problem' into a new perspective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For attractive forces between dark matter charges of like polarity, the Einstein-Proca-matter system exhibits homogeneous isotropic eternal cosmologies free of cosmological curvature singularities, thus eliminating the horizon problem associated with the standard big-bang scenario.

    “For attractive forces between dark matter charges of like polarity the Einstein-Proca-matter system exhibits homogeneous isotropic eternal cosmologies that are free of cosmological curvature singularities thus eliminating the horizon problem associated with the standard big-bang scenario.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Dark matter may couple gravitationally through both its mass and a new kind of gravitational charge.
21 of 21
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Ordinary matter has zero coupling to the Proca field.

    “ordinary matter defined to have zero coupling to the Proca field”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Dark matter has a non-zero coupling to the Proca field.

    “'dark matter' defined to have a non-zero coupling.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Proca charge current takes the convective form jq = q nq Vq with constant Proca charge q.

    “The Proca charge current will be assumed to take the convective form j q = qn q Ṽq (4.6) with constant Proca charge, q (of dimension length).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Proca neutral particle current is j0 = n0 V0.

    “In a similar manner we assume that the Proca neutral particle current is given by j 0 = n 0 Ṽ0 .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Proca charged particles are conserved: d(nq Vq)=0, equivalently djq=0.

    “We postulate conservation of Proca charged particles d(n q Ṽ ) = 0 ⇔ dj q = 0 (since q is constant). (4.7)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Neutral Proca matter is conserved in the late post-inflationary epoch: dj0=0.

    “If the neutral Proca matter is also conserved (as befits behaviour in the late post-inflationary epoch) dj 0 = 0 (4.8)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Both ordinary and dark matter are modeled as fluids with standard stress tensors T0 and Tq.

    “For our discussion of cosmology we model both types of matter by fluids with standard stress tensors T 0 and T q , respectively.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The mass densities of ordinary and dark matter are functions of their particle densities and entropies per particle.

    “The mass densities ρ f , f = 0, q of ordinary and dark matter, respectively, are functions of the particle densities n f and the entropies s f per particle:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Proca field is regarded as a gravitational vector field expected to modify the gravitational effects produced by the tensor nature of Einsteinian gravity.

    “As befits its origin in terms of purely geometrical concepts the Proca field is regarded as a gravitational vector field that is expected to modify the gravitational effects produced by the tensor nature of Einsteinian gravity.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Dark matter currently forms an all-pervading environment in which the less abundant ordinary matter moves.

    “The dark matter is currently assumed to form an all-pervading environment in which the less abundant ordinary matter moves.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Ordinary matter has zero Proca charge, so its interaction with dark matter is purely Newtonian in the non-relativistic low-energy domain.

    “Since the ordinary matter is considered to have zero Proca charge its interaction with the dark matter is purely Newtonian in the non-relativistic low-energy domain.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Stars in a galaxy can be treated as test particles experiencing Newtonian forces from a locally spherical distribution of low-pressure dark matter gas at temperature T and pressure Pq.

    “For simplicity we shall treat the stars in a galaxy to be test particles that experience Newtonian forces from a locally spherical distribution of lowpressure (P q ρ q c 2 ) dark matter gas at some temperature T and pressure P q .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The dark matter temperature now is no hotter than T=2.7 K.

    “Although there is no fundamental reason why the dark matter should have been in thermal equilibrium with the microwave background radiation at any time we may bound our estimates by assuming that its temperature now is no hotter than T = 2.7 K.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Both neutral and Proca charged fluids have the common velocity V0=Vq=(1/c)∂/∂t to a first approximation.

    “Both neutral and Proca charged fluids are supposed to have the common velocity: V 0 = V q = 1 c ∂ ∂t to a first approximation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each fluid maintains the same entropy, so s0 and sq are constants.

    “Furthermore, suppose that each fluid maintains the same entropy so that s 0 and s q are constants.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Proca 1-form is taken as α=A dt, with A=A(t).

    “We adopt as ansätze for the Proca 1-form α = A dt (6.2) where A = A(t).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    During the pure inflation phase the equation of state is P=-c^2 ρ.

    “Thus for the pure inflation phase we prescribe the equation of state P = -c 2 ρ (8.3)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    At the end of the inflationary epoch the Universe proceeds to the current time in a Friedmann era dominated by dark matter modelled as a Proca charged fluid with negligible pressure.

    “For simplicity we arrange that at the end of the inflationary epoch the Universe proceeds to the current time in a Friedmann era dominated by dark matter modelled as a Proca charged fluid with negligible pressure.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The necessary parameters are estimated by requiring q≈ℓpl and mα≈mpl.

    “We estimate the necessary parameters by requiring that q ≈ ℓ pl and m α ≈ m pl .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The amount of dark matter dominates over ordinary matter in the later phase of evolution of the Universe.

    “If one assumes that the amount of dark matter dominates over the ordinary matter in the later phase of evolution of the Universe, that the Proca field mass is of the order of the Planck mass and the appropriate coupling to the dark matter is of the same order as the fine-structure constant then one finds that such hypotheses are consistent with both the inflationary scenario of modern cosmology as”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Proca field mass is of the order of the Planck mass.

    “If one assumes that the amount of dark matter dominates over the ordinary matter in the later phase of evolution of the Universe, that the Proca field mass is of the order of the Planck mass and the appropriate coupling to the dark matter is of the same order as the fine-structure constant then one finds that such hypotheses are consistent with both the inflationary scenario of modern cosmology as”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The appropriate coupling to dark matter is of the same order as the fine-structure constant.

    “If one assumes that the amount of dark matter dominates over the ordinary matter in the later phase of evolution of the Universe, that the Proca field mass is of the order of the Planck mass and the appropriate coupling to the dark matter is of the same order as the fine-structure constant then one finds that such hypotheses are consistent with both the inflationary scenario of modern cosmology as”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Stars composed of ordinary matter interact via Newtonian forces with an all-pervading background of massive gravitationally charged cold dark matter in addition to ordinary matter.

    “The latter follows by assuming that stars, composed of ordinary (as opposed to dark) matter, interact via Newtonian forces to an all-pervading background of massive gravitationally charged cold dark matter in addition to ordinary matter.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Dark matter may couple gravitationally through both its mass and a new kind of gravitational charge.

    “We have suggested that in addition to ordinary matter that couples gravitationally through its mass, the conjectured dark matter in the Universe may couple gravitationally through both its mass and a new kind of gravitational charge.”
24 of 24

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 3 reverses which power approaches zero faster

    Minor

    Near x = 0, the stated |x|1ᐟ3 solution approaches zero more slowly than the stated Friedmann |x|2ᐟ3 solution, not more rapidly.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fowler W A, 1987, Q. J. R. Astron. Soc., 28, 87

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tucker, R. W., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1998-04-01
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
933-954
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2082476233
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
dark matter, massive vector field, cosmic inflation, horizon problem, cold dark matter, galaxy rotation curves, modified gravity, torsion, variational equations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review