Cited by 218Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Principles of Physical Cosmology

Peebles, P. J. E., Harrison, Edward·1994·American Journal of Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1119/1.17585

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The requirement Ω_A < Ω_r provides a stronger constraint on y.

    “A stronger constraint comes from the requirement that Ω A &lt; Ω r . Adopting Ω r = 4 . 2 × 10 -5 h -2 (including the massless neutrinos and the cosmic microwave background [18, 19]), we get”

    From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [18]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peebles, P. J. E., & Harrison, E.
Venue
American Journal of Physics
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
381-381
ISSN
  • 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2909
OpenAlex
W4300570280
Cited by
218
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
cosmology, cosmological principle, cosmic expansion, Big Bang, cosmic microwave background, large-scale structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review