Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hawking radiation from AdS black holes

Hubeny, Veronika E, Marolf, Donald, Rangamani, Mukund·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being at strong coupling can lead to a reduction to the accessible degrees of freedom, from O(N 2 ) to O(1) via confinement.

    “Importantly, being at strong coupling can lead to a reduction to the accessible degrees of freedom, from O(N 2 ) to O(1) via confinement (see also [200]).”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [200]

  • This is a consequence of the large-N super-Yang-Mills theory confining to O(1) degrees of freedom.

    “As noted in [200], this is a consequence of the large-N super-Yang-Mills theory confining to O(1) degrees of freedom.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [200]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1499 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carter B, 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 52, 427
  3. 10.1007/BF02096757 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3052 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.376 · DOI
  6. Hubeny V E, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 095015, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095015 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Maldacena J M, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.066011 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fitzpatrick A L, 2006, J. High Energy Phys., 2006, 033, 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/033 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0920-5632(98)00128-5 · DOI
  11. Aharony O, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 091, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90451-I · DOI
  13. Brynjolfsson E J, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 066, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/066 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.026005 · DOI
  15. Hemming S, 2007, J. High Energy Phys., 2007, 086, 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/086 · DOI
  16. Aharony O, 2004, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 8, 603, 10.4310/ATMP.2004.v8.n4.a1 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.R585 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064005 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Witten E, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 253, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.046008 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.064010 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gregory R, 2000, Class. Quantum Grav., 17, L125, 10.1088/0264-9381/17/18/103 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/s002200050764 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s002200100381 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.126001 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.086002 · DOI
  31. Aharony O, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/007 · DOI
  32. Hubeny V E, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 025001, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/2/025001 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.046002 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5231 · DOI
  35. Carter B, 1968, Commun. Math. Phys., 10, 280, 10.1007/BF03399503 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1063/1.1340869 · DOI
  37. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Brill D R, 1996, Helv. Phys. Acta, 69, 249
  39. Aminneborg S, 1996, Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 2707, 10.1088/0264-9381/13/10/010 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.1068 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.024014 · DOI
  42. Gibbons G W, 2005, Class. Quantum Grav., 22, 1503, 10.1088/0264-9381/22/9/002 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Bhattacharyya S, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 054, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/054 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hubeny, V. E., Marolf, D., & Rangamani, M.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2010-03-29
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
095018
ISSN
  • 0264-9381
  • 1361-6382
Cited by
60
References
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review