Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hawking radiation in large N strongly coupled field theories

Hubeny, Veronika E, Marolf, Donald, Rangamani, Mukund·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095015

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The A→∞ limit of the rotating C-metric with k=+1 is a double-Wick rotation of Kerr-AdS4 metric.

    “Notably, the A → ∞ limit of the rotating C-metric (see below), with k = +1, is a double-Wick rotation of Kerr-AdS 4 metric considered in [9] (see Appendix B of [25]).”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

  • In the context of AdS/CFT, specific limits of the AdS4 C-metric are dual to holographic CFTs living on fixed three-dimensional black hole backgrounds.

    “While beyond the scope of this review, it is worth highlighting that, in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, specific limits of the AdS 4 C-metric are dual to holographic CFTs living on fixed three-dimensional black hole backgrounds [9,342].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1007/BF02096757 · DOI
  2. Carter B, 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 52, 427
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3052 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.376 · DOI
  5. Maldacena J M, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Witten E, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 253, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hubeny V E, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 095018, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095018 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chamblin A, 2000, Phys. Rev., D61, 065007
  11. Fitzpatrick A L, 2006, J. High Energy Phys., 2006, 033, 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/033 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gregory R, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 029, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/029 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gubser S S, 2001, Phys. Rev., D63, 084017
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1143/PTPS.148.307 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Emparan R, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 043, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/043 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.127502 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024035 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kudoh H, 2004, Phys. Rev., D69, 104019
  20. Tanahashi N, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 041, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/041 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Yoshino H, 2009, J. High Energy Phys., 2009, 068, 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/068 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kaus A, 2009, J. High Energy Phys., 2009, 032, 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/032 · DOI
  23. Emparan R, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 036, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/036 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00044-4 · DOI
  25. Aharony O, 2004, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 8, 603, 10.4310/ATMP.2004.v8.n4.a1 · DOI
  26. Gaiotto D, 2007, J. High Energy Phys., 2007, 056, 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/08/056 · DOI
  27. Henningson M, 1998, J. High Energy Phys., 1998, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s002200050764 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/s002200100381 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Fefferman C, 1985, Conformal Invariants Élie Cartan et les Mathématiques d'aujourdhui Astérisque hors série Soc. Math. France, Paris, 95
  31. Bhattacharyya S, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 045, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.091601 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.024014 · DOI
  34. Penrose R, 1986, Spinors and Spacetime, 501
  35. Papadimitriou I, 2005, J. High Energy Phys., 2005, 004, 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/08/004 · DOI
  36. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hubeny V E, 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 025001, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/2/025001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Dias O J C, 2003, Phys. Rev., D67, 064001
  41. Seiberg N, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 017, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/04/017 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.026005 · DOI
  43. Aharony O, 2006, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 2171, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/7/001 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s00220-007-0216-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hubeny, V. E., Marolf, D., & Rangamani, M.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2010-03-26
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
095015
ISSN
  • 0264-9381
  • 1361-6382
Cited by
52
References
7

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review