Cited by 63Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Operator spin foam models

Open access
Bahr, Benjamin, Hellmann, Frank, Kamiński, Wojciech, Kisielowski, Marcin, Lewandowski, Jerzy·2011·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to spin foams. We define operator spin foams, that is foams labelled by group representations and operators, as the main tool. An equivalence relation we impose in the set of the operator spin foams allows to split the faces and the edges of the foams. The consistency with that relation requires introduction of the (familiar for the BF theory) face amplitude. The operator spin foam models are defined quite generally. Imposing a maximal symmetry leads to a family we call natural operator spin foam models. This symmetry, combined with demanding consistency with splitting the edges, determines a complete characterization of a general natural model. It can be obtained by applying arbitrary (quantum) constraints on an arbitrary BF spin foam model. In particular, imposing suitable constraints on Spin(4) BF spin foam model is exactly the way we tend to view 4d quantum gravity, starting with the BC model and continuing with the EPRL or FK models. That makes our framework directly applicable to those models. Specifically, our operator spin foam framework can be translated into the language of spin foams and partition functions. We discuss the examples: BF spin foam model, the BC model, and the model obtained by application of our framework to the EPRL intertwiners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/28/10/105003

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A consistent modification of the EPRL model can be obtained by replacing the non-projector object with a genuine projector.

    “As proposed in [49, 235] one can obtain a consistent modification of the EPRL model by replacing (167) by a genuine projector , graphically 168”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [49]

  • The requirement of anomaly freedom under the discrete symmetry can be met by suitable definitions of the transition amplitudes.

    “We have seen that this requirement (advocated in [90]) can be met by suitable definitions of the transition amplitudes [49, 235]”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]J. Barett, R. Dowdall, W. Fairbairn, H. Gomez, F. Hellmann: Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude (2009) J.Math.Phys. 50 112504 [arXiv:0902.1170 [gr-qc]] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bahr, B., Hellmann, F., Kamiński, W., Kisielowski, M., & Lewandowski, J.
Affiliations
University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
105003
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2142641312
Cited by
63
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
spin foam models, EPRL model, 4D quantum gravity, intertwiners, partition function, group representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review