Cited by 15Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Asymptotics of loop quantum gravity fusion coefficients

Open access
Alesci, Emanuele, Bianchi, Eugenio, Magliaro, Elena, Perini, Claudio·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The fusion coefficients from SO (3) to SO (4) play a key role in the definition of spin foam models for the dynamics in loop quantum gravity. In this paper we give a simple analytic formula of the Engle–Pereira–Rovelli–Livine fusion coefficients. We study the large spin asymptotics and show that they map SO (3) semiclassical intertwiners into SU (2) L × SU (2) R semiclassical intertwiners. This non-trivial property opens the possibility for an analysis of the semiclassical behavior of the model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095016

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Warsaw modification does not affect the leading-order results of the semiclassical limit.

    “Notice that this modification does not interfere with the results of the semiclassical limit (to leading order) as reviewed in Section 13.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Conrady F and Freidel L 2008 On the semiclassical limit of 4d spin foam models arXiv:0809.2280 [gr-qc] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alesci, E., Bianchi, E., Magliaro, E., & Perini, C.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2010-03-26
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
095016
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2043289540
Cited by
15
References
41
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, spin foam models, fusion coefficients, EPRL model, analytic formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review