Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle

Open access
Wagner, T A, Schlamminger, S, Gundlach, J H, Adelberger, E G·2012·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We briefly summarize motivations for testing the weak equivalence principle and then review recent torsion-balance results that compare the differential accelerations of beryllium–aluminum and beryllium–titanium test-body pairs with precisions at the part in 10 13 level. We discuss some implications of these results for the gravitational properties of antimatter and dark matter and speculate about the prospects for further improvements in experimental sensitivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, T. A., Schlamminger, S., Gundlach, J. H., & Adelberger, E. G.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2012-08-15
Volume
29
Issue
18
Pages
184002
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2040272773
Cited by
437
References
20
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002
The paper
Wagner, T. A., Schlamminger, S., Gundlach, J. H., & Adelberger, E. G. (2012). Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.